Safety-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Control via Risk-Sensitive Action-Value Iteration and Quantile Regression

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06954v1
• Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2025 00:22:00 GMT
• Title: Safety-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Control via Risk-Sensitive Action-Value Iteration and Quantile Regression
• Authors: Clinton Enwerem, Aniruddh G. Puranic, John S. Baras, Calin Belta,
• Abstract summary: Quantile-based action-value iteration methods reduce this bias by learning a distribution of the expected cost-to-go.<n>Existing methods often require complex neural architectures or manual tradeoffs due to combined cost functions.<n>We propose a risk-regularized quantile-based algorithm integrating Conditional Value-at-Risk to enforce safety without complex architectures.
• Score: 2.592761128203891
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Mainstream approximate action-value iteration reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms suffer from overestimation bias, leading to suboptimal policies in high-variance stochastic environments. Quantile-based action-value iteration methods reduce this bias by learning a distribution of the expected cost-to-go using quantile regression. However, ensuring that the learned policy satisfies safety constraints remains a challenge when these constraints are not explicitly integrated into the RL framework. Existing methods often require complex neural architectures or manual tradeoffs due to combined cost functions. To address this, we propose a risk-regularized quantile-based algorithm integrating Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) to enforce safety without complex architectures. We also provide theoretical guarantees on the contraction properties of the risk-sensitive distributional Bellman operator in Wasserstein space, ensuring convergence to a unique cost distribution. Simulations of a mobile robot in a dynamic reach-avoid task show that our approach leads to more goal successes, fewer collisions, and better safety-performance trade-offs compared to risk-neutral methods.

Related papers

• Regularization for Adversarial Robust Learning [18.46110328123008]
  We develop a novel approach to adversarial training that integrates $phi$-divergence regularization into the distributionally robust risk function. This regularization brings a notable improvement in computation compared with the original formulation. We validate our proposed method in supervised learning, reinforcement learning, and contextual learning and showcase its state-of-the-art performance against various adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T03:15:41Z)
• Integrating DeepRL with Robust Low-Level Control in Robotic Manipulators for Non-Repetitive Reaching Tasks [0.24578723416255746]
  In robotics, contemporary strategies are learning-based, characterized by a complex black-box nature and a lack of interpretability. We propose integrating a collision-free trajectory planner based on deep reinforcement learning (DRL) with a novel auto-tuning low-level control strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T15:54:03Z)
• Learning Predictive Safety Filter via Decomposition of Robust Invariant Set [6.94348936509225]
  This paper presents advantages of both RMPC and RL RL to synthesize safety filters for nonlinear systems. We propose a policy approach for robust reach problems and establish its complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-12T08:11:28Z)
• Provably Efficient Iterated CVaR Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximation and Human Feedback [57.6775169085215]
  Risk-sensitive reinforcement learning aims to optimize policies that balance the expected reward and risk. We present a novel framework that employs an Iterated Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective under both linear and general function approximations. We propose provably sample-efficient algorithms for this Iterated CVaR RL and provide rigorous theoretical analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T08:14:54Z)
• A Multiplicative Value Function for Safe and Efficient Reinforcement Learning [131.96501469927733]
  We propose a safe model-free RL algorithm with a novel multiplicative value function consisting of a safety critic and a reward critic. The safety critic predicts the probability of constraint violation and discounts the reward critic that only estimates constraint-free returns. We evaluate our method in four safety-focused environments, including classical RL benchmarks augmented with safety constraints and robot navigation tasks with images and raw Lidar scans as observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T18:29:15Z)
• Safety Correction from Baseline: Towards the Risk-aware Policy in Robotics via Dual-agent Reinforcement Learning [64.11013095004786]
  We propose a dual-agent safe reinforcement learning strategy consisting of a baseline and a safe agent. Such a decoupled framework enables high flexibility, data efficiency and risk-awareness for RL-based control. The proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art safe RL algorithms on difficult robot locomotion and manipulation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T03:11:25Z)
• Evaluating Model-free Reinforcement Learning toward Safety-critical Tasks [70.76757529955577]
  This paper revisits prior work in this scope from the perspective of state-wise safe RL. We propose Unrolling Safety Layer (USL), a joint method that combines safety optimization and safety projection. To facilitate further research in this area, we reproduce related algorithms in a unified pipeline and incorporate them into SafeRL-Kit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T06:30:17Z)
• Model-based Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning via a Constrained Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithm [4.128216503196621]
  We propose an On-policy Model-based Safe Deep RL algorithm in which we learn the transition dynamics of the environment in an online manner. We show that our algorithm is more sample efficient and results in lower cumulative hazard violations as compared to constrained model-free approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T06:53:02Z)
• Safe Exploration Incurs Nearly No Additional Sample Complexity for Reward-free RL [43.672794342894946]
  Reward-free reinforcement learning (RF-RL) relies on random action-taking to explore the unknown environment without any reward feedback information. It remains unclear how such safe exploration requirement would affect the corresponding sample complexity in order to achieve the desired optimality of the obtained policy in planning. We propose a unified Safe reWard-frEe ExploraTion (SWEET) framework, and develop algorithms coined Tabular-SWEET and Low-rank-SWEET, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-28T15:00:45Z)
• Closing the Closed-Loop Distribution Shift in Safe Imitation Learning [80.05727171757454]
  We treat safe optimization-based control strategies as experts in an imitation learning problem. We train a learned policy that can be cheaply evaluated at run-time and that provably satisfies the same safety guarantees as the expert.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-18T05:11:41Z)
• Risk-Sensitive Deep RL: Variance-Constrained Actor-Critic Provably Finds Globally Optimal Policy [95.98698822755227]
  We make the first attempt to study risk-sensitive deep reinforcement learning under the average reward setting with the variance risk criteria. We propose an actor-critic algorithm that iteratively and efficiently updates the policy, the Lagrange multiplier, and the Fenchel dual variable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-28T05:02:26Z)
• Constrained Markov Decision Processes via Backward Value Functions [43.649330976089004]
  We model the problem of learning with constraints as a Constrained Markov Decision Process. A key contribution of our approach is to translate cumulative cost constraints into state-based constraints. We provide theoretical guarantees under which the agent converges while ensuring safety over the course of training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-26T20:56:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.