Multi-Step Visual Reasoning with Visual Tokens Scaling and Verification
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07235v1
- Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2025 17:38:49 GMT
- Title: Multi-Step Visual Reasoning with Visual Tokens Scaling and Verification
- Authors: Tianyi Bai, Zengjie Hu, Fupeng Sun, Jiantao Qiu, Yizhen Jiang, Guangxin He, Bohan Zeng, Conghui He, Binhang Yuan, Wentao Zhang,
- Abstract summary: We introduce a novel framework for inference-time visual tokens scaling that enables MLLMs to perform verifier-guided reasoning over visual content.<n>Our method significantly outperforms existing approaches across diverse visual reasoning benchmarks.<n>These results demonstrate the promise of dynamic inference mechanisms for enabling fine-grained, context-aware visual reasoning in next-generation MLLMs.
- Score: 22.871255950998016
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable capabilities by integrating visual perception with language understanding, enabling applications such as image-grounded dialogue, visual question answering, and scientific analysis. However, most MLLMs adopt a static inference paradigm, encoding the entire image into fixed visual tokens upfront, which limits their ability to iteratively refine understanding or adapt to context during inference. This contrasts sharply with human perception, which is dynamic, selective, and feedback-driven. In this work, we introduce a novel framework for inference-time visual token scaling that enables MLLMs to perform iterative, verifier-guided reasoning over visual content. We formulate the problem as a Markov Decision Process, involving a reasoner that proposes visual actions and a verifier, which is trained via multi-step Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), that evaluates these actions and determines when reasoning should terminate. To support this, we present a new dataset, VTS, comprising supervised reasoning trajectories (VTS-SFT) and preference-labeled reasoning comparisons (VTS-DPO). Our method significantly outperforms existing approaches across diverse visual reasoning benchmarks, offering not only improved accuracy but also more interpretable and grounded reasoning processes. These results demonstrate the promise of dynamic inference mechanisms for enabling fine-grained, context-aware visual reasoning in next-generation MLLMs.
Related papers
- Perceptual Decoupling for Scalable Multi-modal Reasoning via Reward-Optimized Captioning [78.17782197231325]
We propose a reasoning-guided reinforcement learning strategy that aligns the extractor's captioning behavior with the reasoning objective.<n> Experiments on multi-modal math and science benchmarks show that the proposed RACRO method achieves state-of-the-art average performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T02:28:07Z) - Don't Look Only Once: Towards Multimodal Interactive Reasoning with Selective Visual Revisitation [22.27973335431714]
We present v1, a lightweight extension to Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>v1 introduces a simple point-and-copy mechanism that allows the model to dynamically retrieve relevant image regions throughout the reasoning process.<n>Our results suggest that dynamic visual access is a promising direction for enhancing grounded multimodal reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-24T19:30:47Z) - Decoupled Visual Interpretation and Linguistic Reasoning for Math Problem Solving [57.22004912994658]
Current large vision-language models (LVLMs) typically employ a connector module to link visual features with text embeddings of large language models (LLMs)<n>This paper proposes a paradigm shift: instead of training end-to-end vision-language reasoning models, we advocate for developing a decoupled reasoning framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-23T08:18:00Z) - V-MAGE: A Game Evaluation Framework for Assessing Vision-Centric Capabilities in Multimodal Large Language Models [84.27290155010533]
We introduce Vision-centric Multiple Abilities Game Evaluation (V-MAGE), a novel game-based evaluation framework.<n>V-MAGE features five distinct video games comprising over 30 carefully constructed evaluation scenarios.<n>We show V-MAGE provides actionable insights for improving the visual and reasoning capabilities of MLLMs in dynamic, interactive settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-08T15:43:01Z) - VIPER: Visual Perception and Explainable Reasoning for Sequential Decision-Making [21.61801132083334]
VIPER is a novel framework for multimodal instruction-based planning.<n>It integrates VLM-based perception with LLM-based reasoning.<n>We show that VIPER significantly outperforms state-of-the-art visual instruction-based planners.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-19T11:05:42Z) - Mitigating Visual Forgetting via Take-along Visual Conditioning for Multi-modal Long CoT Reasoning [53.790502697674754]
We propose Take-along Visual Conditioning (TVC), a strategy that shifts image input to critical reasoning stages.<n>TVC helps the model retain attention to the visual components throughout the reasoning.<n>Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on average across five mathematical reasoning benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-17T16:45:12Z) - VERIFY: A Benchmark of Visual Explanation and Reasoning for Investigating Multimodal Reasoning Fidelity [34.29409506366145]
VERIFY is a benchmark designed to isolate and rigorously evaluate the visual reasoning capabilities of state-of-the-art MLLMs.<n>Each problem is accompanied by a human-annotated reasoning path, making it the first to provide in-depth evaluation of model decision-making processes.<n>We propose novel metrics that assess visual reasoning fidelity beyond mere accuracy, highlighting critical imbalances in current model reasoning patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-14T16:26:11Z) - VOILA: Evaluation of MLLMs For Perceptual Understanding and Analogical Reasoning [63.0285363282581]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have become a powerful tool for integrating visual and textual information.<n>We introduce VOILA, a benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' perceptual understanding and abstract relational reasoning.<n>We reveal that current MLLMs struggle to comprehend inter-image relationships and exhibit limited capabilities in high-level relational reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T23:36:19Z) - Towards Semantic Equivalence of Tokenization in Multimodal LLM [149.11720372278273]
Vision tokenization is essential for semantic alignment between vision and language.<n>This paper proposes a novel dynamic Semantic-Equivalent Vision Tokenizer (SeTok)<n>SeTok groups visual features into semantic units via a dynamic clustering algorithm.<n>The resulting vision tokens effectively preserve semantic integrity and capture both low-frequency and high-frequency visual features.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-07T17:55:43Z) - Visual CoT: Advancing Multi-Modal Language Models with a Comprehensive Dataset and Benchmark for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [40.972648044298374]
Multi-Modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in various VQA tasks.
They often lack interpretability and struggle with complex visual inputs.
We introduce the large-scale Visual CoT dataset comprising 438k question-answer pairs.
We propose a multi-turn processing pipeline that dynamically focuses on visual inputs and provides interpretable thoughts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-25T17:59:23Z) - What Makes for Good Visual Tokenizers for Large Language Models? [26.488269091290597]
We investigate proper pre-training methods to build good visual tokenizers, making Large Language Models (LLMs) powerful Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)
We discuss different visual tokenizers pre-trained with dominant methods (i.e., DeiT, CLIP, MAE, DINO)
We obtain a new MLLM equipped with a tailored Good Visual Tokenizer (GVT), which exhibits strong visual comprehension capability at multiple scales.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-20T16:11:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.