Towards Fair Representation: Clustering and Consensus

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08673v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 10:33:21 GMT
• Title: Towards Fair Representation: Clustering and Consensus
• Authors: Diptarka Chakraborty, Kushagra Chatterjee, Debarati Das, Tien Long Nguyen, Romina Nobahari,
• Abstract summary: We find a consensus clustering that is not only representative but also fair with respect to specific protected attributes.<n>As part of our investigation, we examine how to minimally modify an existing clustering to enforce fairness.<n>We develop an optimal algorithm for datasets with equal group representation and near-linear time constant factor approximation algorithms.
• Score: 1.7243216387069678
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Consensus clustering, a fundamental task in machine learning and data analysis, aims to aggregate multiple input clusterings of a dataset, potentially based on different non-sensitive attributes, into a single clustering that best represents the collective structure of the data. In this work, we study this fundamental problem through the lens of fair clustering, as introduced by Chierichetti et al. [NeurIPS'17], which incorporates the disparate impact doctrine to ensure proportional representation of each protected group in the dataset within every cluster. Our objective is to find a consensus clustering that is not only representative but also fair with respect to specific protected attributes. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to address this problem and provide a constant-factor approximation. As part of our investigation, we examine how to minimally modify an existing clustering to enforce fairness -- an essential postprocessing step in many clustering applications that require fair representation. We develop an optimal algorithm for datasets with equal group representation and near-linear time constant factor approximation algorithms for more general scenarios with different proportions of two group sizes. We complement our approximation result by showing that the problem is NP-hard for two unequal-sized groups. Given the fundamental nature of this problem, we believe our results on Closest Fair Clustering could have broader implications for other clustering problems, particularly those for which no prior approximation guarantees exist for their fair variants.

Related papers

• Accelerating Spectral Clustering under Fairness Constraints [56.865810822418744]
  We present a new efficient method for fair spectral clustering (Fair SC) by casting the Fair SC problem within the difference of convex functions (DC) framework.<n>We show that each associated subproblem can be solved efficiently, resulting in higher computational efficiency compared to prior work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T18:46:27Z)
• Robust Fair Clustering with Group Membership Uncertainty Sets [31.29773979737976]
  We study the canonical fair clustering problem where each cluster is constrained to have close to population-level representation of each group. We introduce a simple noise model that requires a small number of parameters to be given by the decision maker. We present an algorithm for fair clustering with provable emphrobustness guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-02T03:11:31Z)
• Revisiting Instance-Optimal Cluster Recovery in the Labeled Stochastic Block Model [69.15976031704687]
  We propose IAC (Instance-Adaptive Clustering), the first algorithm whose performance matches the instance-specific lower bounds both in expectation and with high probability.<n>IAC maintains an overall computational complexity of $ mathcalO(n, textpolylog(n) $, making it scalable and practical for large-scale problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T08:46:06Z)
• One-step Multi-view Clustering with Diverse Representation [47.41455937479201]
  We propose a one-step multi-view clustering with diverse representation method, which incorporates multi-view learning and $k$-means into a unified framework. We develop an efficient optimization algorithm with proven convergence to solve the resultant problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T02:52:24Z)
• Cluster-level Group Representativity Fairness in $k$-means Clustering [3.420467786581458]
  Clustering algorithms could generate clusters such that different groups are disadvantaged within different clusters. We develop a clustering algorithm, building upon the centroid clustering paradigm pioneered by classical algorithms. We show that our method is effective in enhancing cluster-level group representativity fairness significantly at low impact on cluster coherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-29T22:02:28Z)
• Deep Clustering: A Comprehensive Survey [53.387957674512585]
  Clustering analysis plays an indispensable role in machine learning and data mining. Deep clustering, which can learn clustering-friendly representations using deep neural networks, has been broadly applied in a wide range of clustering tasks. Existing surveys for deep clustering mainly focus on the single-view fields and the network architectures, ignoring the complex application scenarios of clustering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-09T02:31:32Z)
• Improved Approximation for Fair Correlation Clustering [4.629694186457133]
  Correlation clustering is a ubiquitous paradigm in unsupervised machine learning where addressing unfairness is a major challenge. Motivated by this, we study Fair Correlation Clustering where the data points may belong to different protected groups. Our paper significantly generalizes and improves on the quality guarantees of previous work of Ahmadi et al. and Ahmadian et al.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T03:07:57Z)
• Fair Labeled Clustering [28.297893914525517]
  We consider the downstream application of clustering and how group fairness should be ensured for such a setting. We provide algorithms for such problems and show that in contrast to their NP-hard counterparts in group fair clustering, they permit efficient solutions. We also consider a well-motivated alternative setting where the decision-maker is free to assign labels to the clusters regardless of the centers' positions in the metric space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T07:07:12Z)
• Differentially-Private Clustering of Easy Instances [67.04951703461657]
  In differentially private clustering, the goal is to identify $k$ cluster centers without disclosing information on individual data points. We provide implementable differentially private clustering algorithms that provide utility when the data is "easy" We propose a framework that allows us to apply non-private clustering algorithms to the easy instances and privately combine the results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-29T08:13:56Z)
• Clustering to the Fewest Clusters Under Intra-Cluster Dissimilarity Constraints [0.0]
  equiwide clustering relies neither on density nor on a predefined number of expected classes, but on a dissimilarity threshold. We review and evaluate suitable clustering algorithms to identify trade-offs between the various practical solutions for this clustering problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T12:02:18Z)
• You Never Cluster Alone [150.94921340034688]
  We extend the mainstream contrastive learning paradigm to a cluster-level scheme, where all the data subjected to the same cluster contribute to a unified representation. We define a set of categorical variables as clustering assignment confidence, which links the instance-level learning track with the cluster-level one. By reparametrizing the assignment variables, TCC is trained end-to-end, requiring no alternating steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T14:59:59Z)
• Graph Contrastive Clustering [131.67881457114316]
  We propose a novel graph contrastive learning framework, which is then applied to the clustering task and we come up with the Graph Constrastive Clustering(GCC) method. Specifically, on the one hand, the graph Laplacian based contrastive loss is proposed to learn more discriminative and clustering-friendly features. On the other hand, a novel graph-based contrastive learning strategy is proposed to learn more compact clustering assignments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-03T15:32:49Z)
• Scalable Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering [65.66407726145619]
  Existing scalable hierarchical clustering methods sacrifice quality for speed. We present a scalable, agglomerative method for hierarchical clustering that does not sacrifice quality and scales to billions of data points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T15:58:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.