Delegations as Adaptive Representation Patterns: Rethinking Influence in Liquid Democracy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09789v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:34:05 GMT
• Title: Delegations as Adaptive Representation Patterns: Rethinking Influence in Liquid Democracy
• Authors: Davide Grossi, Andreas Nitsche,
• Abstract summary: Liquid democracy is a mechanism for the division of labor in decision-making through the delegation of influence.<n>Transitivity has been identified as a concern as it would be conducive to unrestrained accumulation of power.<n>By introducing a novel model of delegations in liquid democracy, we show how transitivity may in fact contribute to an effective regulation of deliberation influence and decision-making power.
• Score: 5.801044612920816
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Liquid democracy is a mechanism for the division of labor in decision-making through the transitive delegation of influence. In essence, all individuals possess the autonomy to determine the issues with which they will engage directly, while for other matters, they may appoint a representative of their choosing. So far, the literature has studied the delegation structures emerging in liquid democracy as static. As a result, transitivity defined as the capacity to transfer acquired authority to another entity, has been identified as a concern as it would be conducive to unrestrained accumulation of power. Focusing on the implementation of liquid democracy supported by the LiquidFeedback software, we propose a novel approach to assessing the influence of voting nodes in a transitive delegation graph, taking into account the process nature of real-world liquid democracy in which delegation and voting are distinct and increasingly independent activities. By introducing a novel model of delegations in liquid democracy, we show how transitivity may in fact contribute to an effective regulation of deliberation influence and decision-making power. While maintaining the one-person, one-vote paradigm for all votes cast, the anticipated influence of an agent, to the extent it is stemming from transitivity, experiences a precipitous decline following an exponential trajectory. In general, it is our objective to move the first steps towards a rigorous analysis of liquid democracy as an adaptive democratic representation process. The adaptivity aspect of liquid democracy has not yet been explored within the existing academic literature despite it being, we believe, one of its most important features. We therefore also outline a research agenda focusing on this aspect of liquid democracy.

Related papers

• From Experts to the Public: Governing Multimodal Language Models in Politically Sensitive Video Analysis [48.14390493099495]
  This paper examines the governance of large language models (MM-LLMs) through individual and collective deliberation. We conducted a two-step study: first, interviews with 10 journalists established a baseline understanding of expert video interpretation; second, 114 individuals from the general public engaged in deliberation using Inclusive.AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T03:17:38Z)
• Generative AI Voting: Fair Collective Choice is Resilient to LLM Biases and Inconsistencies [21.444936180683147]
  We show that complex preferential ballot formats exhibit significant inconsistencies compared to simpler majoritarian elections.<n>Strikingly though, by demonstrating for the first time in real-world a proportional representation of voters in direct democracy, we are also able to show that fair ballot aggregation methods, such as equal shares, prove to be a win-win.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T01:41:48Z)
• Explaining by Imitating: Understanding Decisions by Interpretable Policy Learning [72.80902932543474]
  Understanding human behavior from observed data is critical for transparency and accountability in decision-making. Consider real-world settings such as healthcare, in which modeling a decision-maker's policy is challenging. We propose a data-driven representation of decision-making behavior that inheres transparency by design, accommodates partial observability, and operates completely offline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T13:06:14Z)
• Liquid Democracy in DPoS Blockchains [4.42985313903391]
  Liquid democracy, also known as delegative voting, allows voters to vote directly or delegate their voting power to others. This paper explores the practical implementation of liquid democracy in Delegated-Proof-of-Stake (DPoS) blockchain systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-03T06:04:11Z)
• As Time Goes By: Adding a Temporal Dimension Towards Resolving Delegations in Liquid Democracy [16.219158909792256]
  Our work takes a first step to integrate a time horizon into decision-making problems in Liquid Democracy systems. Our approach, via a computational complexity analysis, exploits concepts and tools from temporal graph theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T15:46:45Z)
• Inverse Online Learning: Understanding Non-Stationary and Reactionary Policies [79.60322329952453]
  We show how to develop interpretable representations of how agents make decisions. By understanding the decision-making processes underlying a set of observed trajectories, we cast the policy inference problem as the inverse to this online learning problem. We introduce a practical algorithm for retrospectively estimating such perceived effects, alongside the process through which agents update them. Through application to the analysis of UNOS organ donation acceptance decisions, we demonstrate that our approach can bring valuable insights into the factors that govern decision processes and how they change over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T17:40:42Z)
• Power in Liquid Democracy [11.4219428942199]
  The paper develops a theory of power for delegable proxy voting systems. We define a power index able to measure the influence of both voters and delegators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-14T13:17:06Z)
• Inverse Active Sensing: Modeling and Understanding Timely Decision-Making [111.07204912245841]
  We develop a framework for the general setting of evidence-based decision-making under endogenous, context-dependent time pressure. We demonstrate how it enables modeling intuitive notions of surprise, suspense, and optimality in decision strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-25T02:30:45Z)
• A Liquid Perspective on Democratic Choice [1.3833241949666322]
  The idea of liquid democracy responds to a widely-felt desire to make democracy more "fluid" and continuously participatory. This paper develops and explores the "liquid" notion and what it might mean for purposes of enhancing voter choice. The goal of this paper is to disentangle and further develop some of the many concepts and goals that liquid democracy ideas often embody.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T09:43:01Z)
• Fairness by Learning Orthogonal Disentangled Representations [50.82638766862974]
  We propose a novel disentanglement approach to invariant representation problem. We enforce the meaningful representation to be agnostic to sensitive information by entropy. The proposed approach is evaluated on five publicly available datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-12T11:09:15Z)
• InfoBot: Transfer and Exploration via the Information Bottleneck [105.28380750802019]
  A central challenge in reinforcement learning is discovering effective policies for tasks where rewards are sparsely distributed. We propose to learn about decision states from prior experience. We find that this simple mechanism effectively identifies decision states, even in partially observed settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-01-30T15:33:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.