WIP: Exploring the Value of a Debugging Cheat Sheet and Mini Lecture in Improving Undergraduate Debugging Skills and Mindset

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11339v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:19:50 GMT
• Title: WIP: Exploring the Value of a Debugging Cheat Sheet and Mini Lecture in Improving Undergraduate Debugging Skills and Mindset
• Abstract summary: This work-in-progress research paper explores the efficacy of a small-scale microelectronics debug education intervention utilizing quasi-experimental design.<n>Students in the experimental group were faster by an average of 1:43 and had a 7 percent higher success rate than the control group.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This work-in-progress research paper explores the efficacy of a small-scale microelectronics debugging education intervention utilizing quasi-experimental design in an introductory microelectronics course for third-year electrical and computer engineering (ECE) students. In the first semester of research, the experimental group attended a debugging "mini lecture" covering two common sources of circuit error and received a debugging cheat sheet with recommendations for testing and hypothesis formation. Across three debugging problems, students in the experimental group were faster by an average of 1:43 and had a 7 percent higher success rate than the control group. Both groups demonstrated a strong general growth mindset while the experimental group also displayed a shift in their debugging mindset by perceiving a greater value towards debugging. Though these differences are not yet statistically significant, the pilot results indicate that a mini-lecture and debugging cheat sheet are steps in the right direction toward improving students' readiness for debugging in the workplace.

Related papers

• Towards More Empathic Programming Environments: An Experimental Empathic AI-Enhanced IDE [0.0]
  This study introduces "Ceci," our Caring Empathic C IDE designed to support novice programmers by prioritizing learning and emotional support over code generation.<n>Although the sample size was small, results show that there is no significant difference in perceived effectiveness, learning and workload between the Experimental Ceci group and the Control group.<n>These findings suggest that empathic responses may not be sufficient on their own to enhance the learner's outcomes, perceptions, or reduce workload.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T06:45:30Z)
• BugPilot: Complex Bug Generation for Efficient Learning of SWE Skills [59.003563837981886]
  High quality bugs are key to training the next generation of language model based software engineering (SWE) agents.<n>We introduce a novel method for synthetic generation of difficult and diverse bugs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T17:58:56Z)
• Designing for Novice Debuggers: A Pilot Study on an AI-Assisted Debugging Tool [5.192564039251338]
  We present findings from our second design debugger, which we tested with a group of undergraduate students.<n>Our results indicate that the students found the tool highly effective in resolving semantic errors and significantly easier to use than the first version.<n>We conclude that any AI-assisted debug approach should be personalized based on user profiles to optimize their interactions with the tool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T12:18:20Z)
• Reinforcement Learning for Machine Learning Engineering Agents [52.03168614623642]
  We show that agents backed by weaker models that improve via reinforcement learning can outperform agents backed by much larger, but static models.<n>We propose duration- aware gradient updates in a distributed asynchronous RL framework to amplify high-cost but high-reward actions.<n>We also propose environment instrumentation to offer partial credit, distinguishing almost-correct programs from those that fail early.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-01T18:04:10Z)
• Reflective Homework as a Learning Tool: Evidence from Comparing Thirteen Years of Dual vs. Single Submission [0.6320570871611688]
  This study analyzes 13 years of exam data from a computer architecture course to compare student performance under single versus dual-submission homework conditions.<n>Using pooled t-tests on matched exam questions, we found that dual-submission significantly improved outcomes in a majority of cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T20:04:15Z)
• Simulated Interactive Debugging [3.3333163429719677]
  We present our approach called Simulated Interactive that interactively guides students along the debug process.<n>The guidance aims to empower the students to repair their solutions and have a proper "learning" experience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T17:47:18Z)
• A Proposal for a Debugging Learning Support Environment for Undergraduate Students Majoring in Computer Science [0.0]
  Students do not know how to use a debugger or have never used one. We implemented a function in Scratch that allows for self-learning of correct breakpoint placement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T03:34:19Z)
• Navigating Compiler Errors with AI Assistance - A Study of GPT Hints in an Introductory Programming Course [0.23020018305241333]
  We examined the efficacy of AI-assisted learning in an introductory programming course at the university level. We used a GPT-4 model to generate personalized hints for compiler errors within a platform for automated assessment of programming assignments. For the six most commonly occurring error types we observed mixed results in terms of performance when access to GPT hints was enabled for the experimental group.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T13:54:14Z)
• Strong Baselines for Parameter Efficient Few-Shot Fine-tuning [50.83426196335385]
  Few-shot classification (FSC) entails learning novel classes given only a few examples per class after a pre-training (or meta-training) phase. Recent works have shown that simply fine-tuning a pre-trained Vision Transformer (ViT) on new test classes is a strong approach for FSC. Fine-tuning ViTs, however, is expensive in time, compute and storage. This has motivated the design of parameter efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods which fine-tune only a fraction of the Transformer's parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T16:14:39Z)
• PyExperimenter: Easily distribute experiments and track results [63.871474825689134]
  PyExperimenter is a tool to facilitate the setup, documentation, execution, and subsequent evaluation of results from an empirical study of algorithms. It is intended to be used by researchers in the field of artificial intelligence, but is not limited to those.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T10:43:02Z)
• Distantly-Supervised Named Entity Recognition with Adaptive Teacher Learning and Fine-grained Student Ensemble [56.705249154629264]
  Self-training teacher-student frameworks are proposed to improve the robustness of NER models. In this paper, we propose an adaptive teacher learning comprised of two teacher-student networks. Fine-grained student ensemble updates each fragment of the teacher model with a temporal moving average of the corresponding fragment of the student, which enhances consistent predictions on each model fragment against noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T12:14:09Z)
• CLUTR: Curriculum Learning via Unsupervised Task Representation Learning [130.79246770546413]
  CLUTR is a novel curriculum learning algorithm that decouples task representation and curriculum learning into a two-stage optimization. We show CLUTR outperforms PAIRED, a principled and popular UED method, in terms of generalization and sample efficiency in the challenging CarRacing and navigation environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-19T01:45:29Z)
• Benchopt: Reproducible, efficient and collaborative optimization benchmarks [67.29240500171532]
  Benchopt is a framework to automate, reproduce and publish optimization benchmarks in machine learning. Benchopt simplifies benchmarking for the community by providing an off-the-shelf tool for running, sharing and extending experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-27T16:19:24Z)
• Monitor++?: Multiple versus Single Laboratory Monitors in Early Programming Education [4.797216015572358]
  This paper presents an empirical study of an introductory-level programming course with students using multiple monitors. It compares their performance and self-reported experiences versus students using a single monitor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-13T14:56:04Z)
• An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Visual Transformers [70.27107708555185]
  We study the effects of several fundamental components for training self-supervised Visual Transformers. We reveal that these results are indeed partial failure, and they can be improved when training is made more stable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-05T17:59:40Z)
• Cockpit: A Practical Debugging Tool for Training Deep Neural Networks [27.96164890143314]
  We present a collection of instruments that enable a closer look into the inner workings of a learning machine. These instruments leverage novel higher-order information about the gradient distribution and curvature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T16:28:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.