Efficient LLM Collaboration via Planning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11578v2
• Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2025 14:19:07 GMT
• Title: Efficient LLM Collaboration via Planning
• Authors: Byeongchan Lee, Jonghoon Lee, Dongyoung Kim, Jaehyung Kim, Kyungjoon Park, Dongjun Lee, Jinwoo Shin,
• Abstract summary: Small and large models take turns acting as planner and executor, exchanging plans in a multi-stage cascade to collaboratively solve tasks.<n>We demonstrate that COPE achieves performance comparable to large proprietary models, while drastically reducing the inference API cost.
• Score: 56.081879390960204
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recently, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance, ranging from simple to complex tasks. However, while large proprietary models (e.g., models with over 100B parameters) achieve remarkable results across diverse tasks, they are often accessible through costly APIs, making frequent use too costly for many applications. In contrast, small open-source models (e.g., models with fewer than 3B parameters) are freely available and easy to deploy locally, but their performance on complex tasks remains limited. This trade-off raises a natural question: how can small and large models efficiently collaborate to combine their complementary strengths? To bridge this trade-off, we propose COPE, a test-time collaboration framework. A planner model first generates a plan, a high-level abstraction of the task, and this plan serves as a lightweight intermediate that guides a downstream executor model. Small and large models take turns acting as planner and executor, exchanging plans in a multi-stage cascade to collaboratively solve tasks. Through comprehensive experiments on benchmarks spanning mathematical reasoning, code generation, open-ended tasks, and agent tasks, we demonstrate that COPE achieves performance comparable to large proprietary models, while drastically reducing the inference API cost. These results highlight planning as an effective prior for cost-efficient inference.

Related papers

• The Law of Multi-Model Collaboration: Scaling Limits of Model Ensembling for Large Language Models [54.51795784459866]
  We propose a theoretical framework of performance scaling for multi-model collaboration.<n>We show that multi-model systems follow a power-law scaling with respect to the total parameter count.<n> ensembles of heterogeneous model families achieve better performance scaling than those formed within a single model family.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T09:55:12Z)
• Dynamic Generation of Multi-LLM Agents Communication Topologies with Graph Diffusion Models [99.85131798240808]
  We introduce a novel generative framework called textitGuided Topology Diffusion (GTD)<n>Inspired by conditional discrete graph diffusion models, GTD formulates topology synthesis as an iterative construction process.<n>At each step, the generation is steered by a lightweight proxy model that predicts multi-objective rewards.<n>Experiments show that GTD can generate highly task-adaptive, sparse, and efficient communication topologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T05:28:28Z)
• ELHPlan: Efficient Long-Horizon Task Planning for Multi-Agent Collaboration [25.45699736192177]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) enable intelligent multi-robot collaboration but face fundamental trade-offs.<n>We propose ELHPlan, a novel framework that introduces Action Chains--sequences of actions explicitly bound to sub-goal intentions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T03:15:56Z)
• PLAN-TUNING: Post-Training Language Models to Learn Step-by-Step Planning for Complex Problem Solving [66.42260489147617]
  We introduce PLAN-TUNING, a framework that distills synthetic task decompositions from large-scale language models.<n>Plan-TUNING fine-tunes smaller models via supervised and reinforcement-learning objectives to improve complex reasoning.<n>Our analysis demonstrates how planning trajectories improves complex reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T07:30:44Z)
• Route-and-Reason: Scaling Large Language Model Reasoning with Reinforced Model Router [9.580226379350737]
  Multi-step reasoning has proven essential for enhancing the problem-solving capabilities of Large Language Models.<n>Yet, many reasoning steps are relatively simple and can be handled by more efficient smaller-scale language models.<n>We propose R2-Reasoner, a novel framework that enables collaborative reasoning across heterogeneous LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T09:18:56Z)
• An Empirical Study on Strong-Weak Model Collaboration for Repo-level Code Generation [8.28760409619167]
  We study cost-efficient collaboration between strong and weak language models for repository-level code generation.<n>We evaluate a broad spectrum of collaboration strategies: context-based, pipeline-based, and dynamic.<n>Our most effective collaborative strategy achieves equivalent performance to the strong model while reducing the cost by 40%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T16:25:38Z)
• LightRouter: Towards Efficient LLM Collaboration with Minimal Overhead [19.573553157421774]
  Light is a novel framework designed to systematically select and integrate a small subset of LLMs from a larger pool.<n>Experiments demonstrate that Light matches or outperforms widely-used ensemble baselines, achieving up to a 25% improvement in accuracy.<n>This work introduces a practical approach for efficient LLM selection and provides valuable insights into optimal strategies for model combination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T04:46:04Z)
• Plan and Budget: Effective and Efficient Test-Time Scaling on Large Language Model Reasoning [19.258292534503887]
  Plan-and-Budget is a model-agnostic, test-time framework that decomposes complex queries into sub-questions and allocates token budgets based on estimated complexity using adaptive scheduling.<n>Plan-and-Budget improves reasoning efficiency across a range of tasks and models, achieving up to +70% accuracy gains, tangential -39% token reduction, and +187.5% improvement in $E3$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T01:56:29Z)
• CoLA: Collaborative Low-Rank Adaptation [3.421904493396495]
  Fine-tuning a pre-trained model for specific tasks achieves strong performance; however, it is computationally expensive and inefficient.<n>LoRA, in particular, has proven effective, but its application to multi-task scenarios is limited by interference between tasks.<n>We propose CoLA, a more flexible LoRA architecture and three collaborative strategies to enhance performance by better utilizing the quantitative relationships between $A$ and $B$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T12:46:42Z)
• Scalable Chain of Thoughts via Elastic Reasoning [61.75753924952059]
  Elastic Reasoning is a novel framework for scalable chain of thoughts.<n>It separates reasoning into two phases--thinking and solution--with independently allocated budgets.<n>Our approach produces more concise and efficient reasoning even in unconstrained settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T15:01:06Z)
• Improving Large Models with Small models: Lower Costs and Better Performance [81.55672406002715]
  We propose Data Shunt$+$ (DS$+$), a general paradigm for collaboration of small and large models. For instance, ChatGPT achieves an accuracy of $94.43%$ on Amazon Product sentiment analysis, and DS$+$ achieves an accuracy of $95.64%$, while the cost has been reduced to only $31.18%$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-15T14:44:43Z)
• MAP: Low-compute Model Merging with Amortized Pareto Fronts via Quadratic Approximation [80.47072100963017]
  We introduce a novel and low-compute algorithm, Model Merging with Amortized Pareto Front (MAP)<n>MAP efficiently identifies a set of scaling coefficients for merging multiple models, reflecting the trade-offs involved.<n>We also introduce Bayesian MAP for scenarios with a relatively low number of tasks and Nested MAP for situations with a high number of tasks, further reducing the computational cost of evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T17:55:25Z)
• Towards Efficient LLM Grounding for Embodied Multi-Agent Collaboration [70.09561665520043]
  We propose a novel framework for multi-agent collaboration that introduces Reinforced Advantage feedback (ReAd) for efficient self-refinement of plans. We provide theoretical analysis by extending advantage-weighted regression in reinforcement learning to multi-agent systems. Experiments on Over-AI and a difficult variant of RoCoBench show that ReAd surpasses baselines in success rate, and also significantly decreases the interaction steps of agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T08:33:19Z)
• Optimising Calls to Large Language Models with Uncertainty-Based Two-Tier Selection [80.63946798650653]
  Decision centers on whether to use a large LLM with better performance or a smaller one with reduced costs. We propose a simpler solution; we use only the uncertainty of the generations of the small LLM as the decision criterion. Our experiments reveal this simple solution optimally balances cost and performance, outperforming existing methods on 25 out of 27 experimental setups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T14:38:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.