Conditional Average Treatment Effect Estimation Under Hidden Confounders

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12304v1
• Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 01:43:07 GMT
• Title: Conditional Average Treatment Effect Estimation Under Hidden Confounders
• Authors: Ahmed Aloui, Juncheng Dong, Ali Hasan, Vahid Tarokh,
• Abstract summary: We propose a CATE estimation method based on a pseudo-confounder generator and a CATE model.<n>Our method is applicable to many practical scenarios of interest, particularly those where privacy is a concern.
• Score: 25.62280114114055
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: One of the major challenges in estimating conditional potential outcomes and conditional average treatment effects (CATE) is the presence of hidden confounders. Since testing for hidden confounders cannot be accomplished only with observational data, conditional unconfoundedness is commonly assumed in the literature of CATE estimation. Nevertheless, under this assumption, CATE estimation can be significantly biased due to the effects of unobserved confounders. In this work, we consider the case where in addition to a potentially large observational dataset, a small dataset from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is available. Notably, we make no assumptions on the existence of any covariate information for the RCT dataset, we only require the outcomes to be observed. We propose a CATE estimation method based on a pseudo-confounder generator and a CATE model that aligns the learned potential outcomes from the observational data with those observed from the RCT. Our method is applicable to many practical scenarios of interest, particularly those where privacy is a concern (e.g., medical applications). Extensive numerical experiments are provided demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach for both synthetic and real-world datasets.

Related papers

• Robust estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects in randomized trials leveraging external data [1.3124513975412255]
  We propose the QR-learner, a model-agnostic learner that estimates conditional average treatment effects (CATE) within the trial population.<n>It has the potential to reduce the CATE prediction mean squared error while maintaining consistency, even when the external data is not aligned with the trial.<n>We apply the methods to a real-world dataset, demonstrating improvements in both CATE estimation and statistical power for detecting heterogeneous effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-04T16:01:05Z)
• A Partial Initialization Strategy to Mitigate the Overfitting Problem in CATE Estimation with Hidden Confounding [44.874826691991565]
  Estimating the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) from observational data plays a crucial role in areas such as e-commerce, healthcare, and economics.<n>Existing studies mainly rely on the strong ignorability assumption that there are no hidden confounders.<n>Data collected from randomized controlled trials (RCT) do not suffer from confounding but are usually limited by a small sample size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-15T15:58:16Z)
• Combining Incomplete Observational and Randomized Data for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects [10.9134216137537]
  Existing methods for integrating observational data with randomized data must require textitcomplete observational data. We propose a resilient approach to textbfCombine textbfIncomplete textbfObservational data and randomized data for HTE estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T06:19:14Z)
• Approximating Counterfactual Bounds while Fusing Observational, Biased and Randomised Data Sources [64.96984404868411]
  We address the problem of integrating data from multiple, possibly biased, observational and interventional studies. We show that the likelihood of the available data has no local maxima. We then show how the same approach can address the general case of multiple datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T11:28:24Z)
• B-Learner: Quasi-Oracle Bounds on Heterogeneous Causal Effects Under Hidden Confounding [51.74479522965712]
  We propose a meta-learner called the B-Learner, which can efficiently learn sharp bounds on the CATE function under limits on hidden confounding. We prove its estimates are valid, sharp, efficient, and have a quasi-oracle property with respect to the constituent estimators under more general conditions than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T18:07:19Z)
• Falsification before Extrapolation in Causal Effect Estimation [6.715453431174765]
  Causal effects in populations are often estimated using observational datasets. We propose a meta-algorithm that attempts to reject observational estimates that are biased.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-27T21:47:23Z)
• Treatment Effect Risk: Bounds and Inference [58.442274475425144]
  Since the average treatment effect measures the change in social welfare, even if positive, there is a risk of negative effect on, say, some 10% of the population. In this paper we consider how to nonetheless assess this important risk measure, formalized as the conditional value at risk (CVaR) of the ITE distribution. Some bounds can also be interpreted as summarizing a complex CATE function into a single metric and are of interest independently of being a bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T17:21:26Z)
• Doing Great at Estimating CATE? On the Neglected Assumptions in Benchmark Comparisons of Treatment Effect Estimators [91.3755431537592]
  We show that even in arguably the simplest setting, estimation under ignorability assumptions can be misleading. We consider two popular machine learning benchmark datasets for evaluation of heterogeneous treatment effect estimators. We highlight that the inherent characteristics of the benchmark datasets favor some algorithms over others.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T13:21:27Z)
• Multi-Source Causal Inference Using Control Variates [81.57072928775509]
  We propose a general algorithm to estimate causal effects from emphmultiple data sources. We show theoretically that this reduces the variance of the ATE estimate. We apply this framework to inference from observational data under an outcome selection bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-30T21:20:51Z)
• Quantifying Ignorance in Individual-Level Causal-Effect Estimates under Hidden Confounding [38.09565581056218]
  We study the problem of learning conditional average treatment effects (CATE) from high-dimensional, observational data with unobserved confounders. We present a new parametric interval estimator suited for high-dimensional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T15:58:06Z)
• Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
  Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials. We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z)
• Causal Inference With Selectively Deconfounded Data [22.624714904663424]
  We consider the benefit of incorporating a large confounded observational dataset (confounder unobserved) alongside a small deconfounded observational dataset (confounder revealed) when estimating the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) Our theoretical results suggest that the inclusion of confounded data can significantly reduce the quantity of deconfounded data required to estimate the ATE to within a desired accuracy level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-25T18:46:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.