Can you see how I learn? Human observers' inferences about Reinforcement Learning agents' learning processes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13583v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 15:04:27 GMT
• Title: Can you see how I learn? Human observers' inferences about Reinforcement Learning agents' learning processes
• Authors: Bernhard Hilpert, Muhan Hou, Kim Baraka, Joost Broekens,
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents often exhibit learning behaviors that are not intuitively interpretable by human observers.<n>This work provides a data-driven understanding of the factors of human observers' understanding of the agent's learning process.
• Score: 1.6874375111244329
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents often exhibit learning behaviors that are not intuitively interpretable by human observers, which can result in suboptimal feedback in collaborative teaching settings. Yet, how humans perceive and interpret RL agent's learning behavior is largely unknown. In a bottom-up approach with two experiments, this work provides a data-driven understanding of the factors of human observers' understanding of the agent's learning process. A novel, observation-based paradigm to directly assess human inferences about agent learning was developed. In an exploratory interview study (\textit{N}=9), we identify four core themes in human interpretations: Agent Goals, Knowledge, Decision Making, and Learning Mechanisms. A second confirmatory study (\textit{N}=34) applied an expanded version of the paradigm across two tasks (navigation/manipulation) and two RL algorithms (tabular/function approximation). Analyses of 816 responses confirmed the reliability of the paradigm and refined the thematic framework, revealing how these themes evolve over time and interrelate. Our findings provide a human-centered understanding of how people make sense of agent learning, offering actionable insights for designing interpretable RL systems and improving transparency in Human-Robot Interaction.

Related papers

• When Models Know More Than They Can Explain: Quantifying Knowledge Transfer in Human-AI Collaboration [79.69935257008467]
  We introduce Knowledge Integration and Transfer Evaluation (KITE), a conceptual and experimental framework for Human-AI knowledge transfer capabilities.<n>We conduct the first large-scale human study (N=118) explicitly designed to measure it.<n>In our two-phase setup, humans first ideate with an AI on problem-solving strategies, then independently implement solutions, isolating model explanations' influence on human understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T20:48:16Z)
• Truly Self-Improving Agents Require Intrinsic Metacognitive Learning [59.60803539959191]
  Self-improving agents aim to continuously acquire new capabilities with minimal supervision.<n>Current approaches face two key limitations: their self-improvement processes are often rigid, fail to generalize across tasks domains, and struggle to scale with increasing agent capabilities.<n>We argue that effective self-improvement requires intrinsic metacognitive learning, defined as an agent's intrinsic ability to actively evaluate, reflect on, and adapt its own learning processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T14:53:35Z)
• Prosody as a Teaching Signal for Agent Learning: Exploratory Studies and Algorithmic Implications [2.8243597585456017]
  This paper advocates for the integration of prosody as a teaching signal to enhance agent learning from human teachers. Our findings suggest that prosodic features, when coupled with explicit feedback, can enhance reinforcement learning outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T01:51:23Z)
• CogniDual Framework: Self-Training Large Language Models within a Dual-System Theoretical Framework for Improving Cognitive Tasks [39.43278448546028]
  Kahneman's dual-system theory elucidates the human decision-making process, distinguishing between the rapid, intuitive System 1 and the deliberative, rational System 2. Recent advancements have positioned large language Models (LLMs) as formidable tools nearing human-level proficiency in various cognitive tasks. This study introduces the textbfCogniDual Framework for LLMs (CFLLMs), designed to assess whether LLMs can, through self-training, evolve from deliberate deduction to intuitive responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T09:33:24Z)
• Incremental procedural and sensorimotor learning in cognitive humanoid robots [52.77024349608834]
  This work presents a cognitive agent that can learn procedures incrementally. We show the cognitive functions required in each substage and how adding new functions helps address tasks previously unsolved by the agent. Results show that this approach is capable of solving complex tasks incrementally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-30T22:51:31Z)
• Interpreting Neural Policies with Disentangled Tree Representations [58.769048492254555]
  We study interpretability of compact neural policies through the lens of disentangled representation. We leverage decision trees to obtain factors of variation for disentanglement in robot learning. We introduce interpretability metrics that measure disentanglement of learned neural dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T01:10:41Z)
• Assessing Human Interaction in Virtual Reality With Continually Learning Prediction Agents Based on Reinforcement Learning Algorithms: A Pilot Study [6.076137037890219]
  We investigate how the interaction between a human and a continually learning prediction agent develops as the agent develops competency. We develop a virtual reality environment and a time-based prediction task wherein learned predictions from a reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm augment human predictions. Our findings suggest that human trust of the system may be influenced by early interactions with the agent, and that trust in turn affects strategic behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-14T22:46:44Z)
• PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training [94.87393610927812]
  We present an off-policy, interactive reinforcement learning algorithm that capitalizes on the strengths of both feedback and off-policy learning. We demonstrate that our approach is capable of learning tasks of higher complexity than previously considered by human-in-the-loop methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T14:10:50Z)
• Deep Interpretable Models of Theory of Mind For Human-Agent Teaming [0.7734726150561086]
  We develop an interpretable modular neural framework for modeling the intentions of other observed entities. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach with experiments on data from human participants on a search and rescue task in Minecraft.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T06:18:58Z)
• Explainability in Deep Reinforcement Learning [68.8204255655161]
  We review recent works in the direction to attain Explainable Reinforcement Learning (XRL) In critical situations where it is essential to justify and explain the agent's behaviour, better explainability and interpretability of RL models could help gain scientific insight on the inner workings of what is still considered a black box.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-15T10:11:42Z)
• Accelerating Reinforcement Learning Agent with EEG-based Implicit Human Feedback [10.138798960466222]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents with human feedback can dramatically improve various aspects of learning. Previous methods require human observer to give inputs explicitly, burdening the human in the loop of RL agent's learning process. We investigate capturing human's intrinsic reactions as implicit (and natural) feedback through EEG in the form of error-related potentials (ErrP)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-30T03:13:37Z)
• Explainable Active Learning (XAL): An Empirical Study of How Local Explanations Impact Annotator Experience [76.9910678786031]
  We propose a novel paradigm of explainable active learning (XAL), by introducing techniques from the recently surging field of explainable AI (XAI) into an Active Learning setting. Our study shows benefits of AI explanation as interfaces for machine teaching--supporting trust calibration and enabling rich forms of teaching feedback, and potential drawbacks--anchoring effect with the model judgment and cognitive workload.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-24T22:52:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.