The Pitfalls and Potentials of Adding Gene-invariance to Optimal Mixing
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15222v1
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 08:06:44 GMT
- Title: The Pitfalls and Potentials of Adding Gene-invariance to Optimal Mixing
- Authors: Anton Bouter, Dirk Thierens, Peter A. N. Bosman,
- Abstract summary: Optimal Mixing (OM) is a variation operator that integrates local search with genetic recombination.<n>We propose a solution inspired by the Gene Invariant Genetic Algorithm (GIGA), which preserves gene frequencies in the population throughout the process.<n>This technique is tailored to and integrated with the Gene-pool Optimal Mixing Evolutionary Algorithm (GOMEA), resulting in GI-GOMEA.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Optimal Mixing (OM) is a variation operator that integrates local search with genetic recombination. EAs with OM are capable of state-of-the-art optimization in discrete spaces, offering significant advantages over classic recombination-based EAs. This success is partly due to high selection pressure that drives rapid convergence. However, this can also negatively impact population diversity, complicating the solving of hierarchical problems, which feature multiple layers of complexity. While there have been attempts to address this issue, these solutions are often complicated and prone to bias. To overcome this, we propose a solution inspired by the Gene Invariant Genetic Algorithm (GIGA), which preserves gene frequencies in the population throughout the process. This technique is tailored to and integrated with the Gene-pool Optimal Mixing Evolutionary Algorithm (GOMEA), resulting in GI-GOMEA. The simple, yet elegant changes are found to have striking potential: GI-GOMEA outperforms GOMEA on a range of well-known problems, even when these problems are adjusted for pitfalls - biases in much-used benchmark problems that can be easily exploited by maintaining gene invariance. Perhaps even more notably, GI-GOMEA is also found to be effective at solving hierarchical problems, including newly introduced asymmetric hierarchical trap functions.
Related papers
- OMEGA: Can LLMs Reason Outside the Box in Math? Evaluating Exploratory, Compositional, and Transformative Generalization [88.76091817642963]
Recent large-scale language models (LLMs) with long Chain-of-such reasoning as DeepSeek-R1-have achieved impressive results on Olympiad-level mathematics.<n>We introduce OMEGA-Out-of-distribution Math Problems Evaluation with 3 Generalization Axes-a benchmark designed to evaluate three axes of out-of-distribution generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-23T17:51:40Z) - Effective Adaptive Mutation Rates for Program Synthesis [3.2228025627337864]
Problem-solving performance of evolutionary algorithms depends on mutation rates.
We propose an adaptive bandit-based mutation scheme that removes the need to specify a mutation rate.
Results on software synthesis and symbolic regression problems validate the effectiveness of our approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-23T00:56:37Z) - Evaluating Genetic Algorithms through the Approximability Hierarchy [55.938644481736446]
In this paper, we analyze the usefulness of using genetic algorithms depending on the approximation class the problem belongs to.
In particular, we use the standard approximability hierarchy, showing that genetic algorithms are especially useful for the most pessimistic classes of the hierarchy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-01T09:18:34Z) - Genetic Algorithm enhanced by Deep Reinforcement Learning in parent
selection mechanism and mutation : Minimizing makespan in permutation flow
shop scheduling problems [0.18846515534317265]
The proposed RL+GA method was specifically tested on the flow shop scheduling problem (FSP)
The hybrid algorithm incorporates neural networks (NN) and uses the off-policy method Q-learning.
Results of the study highlight the effectiveness of the RL+GA approach in improving the performance of the primitive GA.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-10T08:51:42Z) - Genetic Engineering Algorithm (GEA): An Efficient Metaheuristic
Algorithm for Solving Combinatorial Optimization Problems [1.8434042562191815]
Genetic Algorithms (GAs) are known for their efficiency in solving optimization problems.
This paper proposes a new metaheuristic algorithm called the Genetic Engineering Algorithm (GEA) that draws inspiration from genetic engineering concepts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-28T13:05:30Z) - Clipped Stochastic Methods for Variational Inequalities with
Heavy-Tailed Noise [64.85879194013407]
We prove the first high-probability results with logarithmic dependence on the confidence level for methods for solving monotone and structured non-monotone VIPs.
Our results match the best-known ones in the light-tails case and are novel for structured non-monotone problems.
In addition, we numerically validate that the gradient noise of many practical formulations is heavy-tailed and show that clipping improves the performance of SEG/SGDA.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-02T15:21:55Z) - Effective Mutation Rate Adaptation through Group Elite Selection [50.88204196504888]
This paper introduces the Group Elite Selection of Mutation Rates (GESMR) algorithm.
GESMR co-evolves a population of solutions and a population of MRs, such that each MR is assigned to a group of solutions.
With the same number of function evaluations and with almost no overhead, GESMR converges faster and to better solutions than previous approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-11T01:08:26Z) - Stochastic Gradient Descent-Ascent: Unified Theory and New Efficient
Methods [73.35353358543507]
Gradient Descent-Ascent (SGDA) is one of the most prominent algorithms for solving min-max optimization and variational inequalities problems (VIP)
In this paper, we propose a unified convergence analysis that covers a large variety of descent-ascent methods.
We develop several new variants of SGDA such as a new variance-reduced method (L-SVRGDA), new distributed methods with compression (QSGDA, DIANA-SGDA, VR-DIANA-SGDA), and a new method with coordinate randomization (SEGA-SGDA)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-15T09:17:39Z) - Result Diversification by Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms with
Theoretical Guarantees [94.72461292387146]
We propose to reformulate the result diversification problem as a bi-objective search problem, and solve it by a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (EA)
We theoretically prove that the GSEMO can achieve the optimal-time approximation ratio, $1/2$.
When the objective function changes dynamically, the GSEMO can maintain this approximation ratio in running time, addressing the open question proposed by Borodin et al.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-18T14:00:22Z) - Harnessing Heterogeneity: Learning from Decomposed Feedback in Bayesian
Modeling [68.69431580852535]
We introduce a novel GP regression to incorporate the subgroup feedback.
Our modified regression has provably lower variance -- and thus a more accurate posterior -- compared to previous approaches.
We execute our algorithm on two disparate social problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-07T03:57:22Z) - A Rank based Adaptive Mutation in Genetic Algorithm [0.0]
This paper presents an alternate approach of mutation probability generation using chromosome rank to avoid any susceptibility to fitness distribution.
Experiments are done to compare results of simple genetic algorithm (SGA) with constant mutation probability and adaptive approaches within a limited resource constraint.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-18T12:41:33Z) - Tip the Balance: Improving Exploration of Balanced Crossover Operators
by Adaptive Bias [2.610470075814367]
The use of balanced crossover operators in Genetic Algorithms (GA) ensures that the binary strings generated as offsprings have the same Hamming weight of the parents.
Although this method reduces the size of the search space, the resulting fitness landscape often becomes more difficult for the GA to explore.
This issue has been studied in this paper by applying an adaptive bias strategy to a counter-based crossover operator.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-23T17:26:43Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.