Minding the Politeness Gap in Cross-cultural Communication

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15623v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 16:52:20 GMT
• Title: Minding the Politeness Gap in Cross-cultural Communication
• Abstract summary: We report three experiments examining how speakers of British and American English interpret intensifiers like "quite" and "very"<n>To better understand these cross-cultural differences, we developed a computational cognitive model.
• Score: 45.22890665118997
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Misunderstandings in cross-cultural communication often arise from subtle differences in interpretation, but it is unclear whether these differences arise from the literal meanings assigned to words or from more general pragmatic factors such as norms around politeness and brevity. In this paper, we report three experiments examining how speakers of British and American English interpret intensifiers like "quite" and "very." To better understand these cross-cultural differences, we developed a computational cognitive model where listeners recursively reason about speakers who balance informativity, politeness, and utterance cost. Our model comparisons suggested that cross-cultural differences in intensifier interpretation stem from a combination of (1) different literal meanings, (2) different weights on utterance cost. These findings challenge accounts based purely on semantic variation or politeness norms, demonstrating that cross-cultural differences in interpretation emerge from an intricate interplay between the two.

Related papers

• Same Lesson, Different Story: Cross-Lingual Reconstruction of Cultural Narratives in Large Language Models [0.0]
  This study introduces a multilingual evaluation narrative framework that integrates a cross-linguistic collection of 414 proverbs spanning 15 languages.<n>The analysis assesses whether models preserve meaning across languages, how cross-lingual conditioning influences narrative realization, and whether different model families converge on similar interpretations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-23T14:10:34Z)
• Supervised Semantic Differential for Cross-Cultural Concept Analysis: A Case Study of Human Affect [0.16385815610837165]
  Cross-lingual comparison of psychological meaning requires methods that go beyond word-level translation.<n>We introduce a cross-lingual extension of the Supervised Semantic Differential (SSD), which estimates supervised semantic gradients in embedding space.<n>We demonstrate the approach on Polish, English, and French affective norm lexicons, modeling Valence, Arousal, and Dominance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T09:40:34Z)
• Do LLMs Capture Embodied Cognition and Cultural Variation? Cross-Linguistic Evidence from Demonstratives [9.704536811806728]
  We introduce demonstratives, fundamental spatial expressions like "this/that" in English and "zh/n" in Chinese, as a novel probe for grounded knowledge.<n>Using 6,400 responses from 320 native speakers, we establish a human baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T09:30:12Z)
• When Meanings Meet: Investigating the Emergence and Quality of Shared Concept Spaces during Multilingual Language Model Training [57.230355403478995]
  We investigate the development of language-agnostic concept spaces during pretraining of EuroLLM.<n>We find that shared concept spaces emerge early and continue to refine, but that alignment with them is language-dependent.<n>In contrast to prior work, our fine-grained manual analysis reveals that some apparent gains in translation quality reflect shifts in behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T11:23:01Z)
• Language over Content: Tracing Cultural Understanding in Multilingual Large Language Models [10.798925500517823]
  Internal paths overlap more for same-language, cross-country questions than for cross-language, same-country questions.<n>Results show that internal paths overlap more for same-language, cross-country questions than for cross-language, same-country questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-18T16:19:45Z)
• Investigating Lexical Change through Cross-Linguistic Colexification Patterns [0.6474760227870046]
  Colexification -- the phenomenon of expressing multiple distinct concepts using the same word form -- serves as a valuable window onto the dynamics of meaning change across languages.<n>We apply comparative models to dictionary data from three language families, Austronesian, Indo-European, and Uralic, in order to shed light on the evolutionary dynamics underlying the colexification of concept pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T11:04:28Z)
• Multilingual Vision-Language Models, A Survey [0.9722250595763385]
  This survey examines multilingual vision-language models that process text and images across languages.<n>We review 31 models and 21 benchmarks, spanning encoder-only and generative architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T09:46:13Z)
• Extrinsic Evaluation of Cultural Competence in Large Language Models [53.626808086522985]
  We focus on extrinsic evaluation of cultural competence in two text generation tasks. We evaluate model outputs when an explicit cue of culture, specifically nationality, is perturbed in the prompts. We find weak correlations between text similarity of outputs for different countries and the cultural values of these countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T14:03:27Z)
• Investigating Cultural Alignment of Large Language Models [10.738300803676655]
  We show that Large Language Models (LLMs) genuinely encapsulate the diverse knowledge adopted by different cultures. We quantify cultural alignment by simulating sociological surveys, comparing model responses to those of actual survey participants as references. We introduce Anthropological Prompting, a novel method leveraging anthropological reasoning to enhance cultural alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T18:47:28Z)
• Language-based Valence and Arousal Expressions between the United States and China: a Cross-Cultural Examination [6.122854363918857]
  This paper explores cultural differences in affective expressions by comparing Twitter/X (geolocated to the US) and Sina Weibo (in Mainland China)<n>Using the NRC-VAD lexicon to measure valence and arousal, we identify distinct patterns of emotional expression across both platforms.<n>We uncover significant cross-cultural differences in arousal, with US users displaying higher emotional intensity than Chinese users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-10T16:32:25Z)
• Multi-lingual and Multi-cultural Figurative Language Understanding [69.47641938200817]
  Figurative language permeates human communication, but is relatively understudied in NLP. We create a dataset for seven diverse languages associated with a variety of cultures: Hindi, Indonesian, Javanese, Kannada, Sundanese, Swahili and Yoruba. Our dataset reveals that each language relies on cultural and regional concepts for figurative expressions, with the highest overlap between languages originating from the same region. All languages exhibit a significant deficiency compared to English, with variations in performance reflecting the availability of pre-training and fine-tuning data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T15:30:31Z)
• Assessing Cross-Cultural Alignment between ChatGPT and Human Societies: An Empirical Study [9.919972416590124]
  ChatGPT has garnered widespread recognition for its exceptional ability to generate human-like responses in dialogue. We investigate the underlying cultural background of ChatGPT by analyzing its responses to questions designed to quantify human cultural differences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T15:43:39Z)
• Perception Point: Identifying Critical Learning Periods in Speech for Bilingual Networks [58.24134321728942]
  We compare and identify cognitive aspects on deep neural-based visual lip-reading models. We observe a strong correlation between these theories in cognitive psychology and our unique modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T05:30:50Z)
• Deception detection in text and its relation to the cultural dimension of individualism/collectivism [6.17866386107486]
  We investigate if differences in the usage of specific linguistic features of deception across cultures can be confirmed and attributed to norms in respect to the individualism/collectivism divide. We create culture/language-aware classifiers by experimenting with a wide range of n-gram features based on phonology, morphology and syntax. We conducted our experiments over 11 datasets from 5 languages i.e., English, Dutch, Russian, Spanish and Romanian, from six countries (US, Belgium, India, Russia, Mexico and Romania)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-26T13:09:47Z)
• On the Faithfulness Measurements for Model Interpretations [100.2730234575114]
  Post-hoc interpretations aim to uncover how natural language processing (NLP) models make predictions. To tackle these issues, we start with three criteria: the removal-based criterion, the sensitivity of interpretations, and the stability of interpretations. Motivated by the desideratum of these faithfulness notions, we introduce a new class of interpretation methods that adopt techniques from the adversarial domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T09:19:44Z)
• Did they answer? Subjective acts and intents in conversational discourse [48.63528550837949]
  We present the first discourse dataset with multiple and subjective interpretations of English conversation. We show disagreements are nuanced and require a deeper understanding of the different contextual factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-09T16:34:19Z)
• Identifying Distributional Perspective Differences from Colingual Groups [41.58939666949895]
  A lack of mutual understanding among different groups about their perspectives on specific values or events may lead to uninformed decisions or biased opinions. We study colingual groups and use language corpora as a proxy to identify their distributional perspectives. We present a novel computational approach to learn shared understandings, and benchmark our method by building culturally-aware models for the English, Chinese, and Japanese languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-10T08:13:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.