Aligning ASR Evaluation with Human and LLM Judgments: Intelligibility Metrics Using Phonetic, Semantic, and NLI Approaches

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16528v1
• Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 18:21:19 GMT
• Title: Aligning ASR Evaluation with Human and LLM Judgments: Intelligibility Metrics Using Phonetic, Semantic, and NLI Approaches
• Authors: Bornali Phukon, Xiuwen Zheng, Mark Hasegawa-Johnson,
• Abstract summary: We identify two key challenges: (1) Existing metrics do not adequately reflect intelligibility, and (2) while LLMs can refine ASR output, their effectiveness in correcting ASR transcripts is underexplored.<n>We propose a novel metric integrating Natural Language Inference (NLI) scores, semantic similarity, and phonetic similarity.<n>Our ASR evaluation metric achieves a 0.890 correlation with human judgments on Speech Accessibility Project data, surpassing traditional methods and emphasizing the need to prioritize intelligibility over error-based measures.
• Score: 28.79400870481616
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Traditional ASR metrics like WER and CER fail to capture intelligibility, especially for dysarthric and dysphonic speech, where semantic alignment matters more than exact word matches. ASR systems struggle with these speech types, often producing errors like phoneme repetitions and imprecise consonants, yet the meaning remains clear to human listeners. We identify two key challenges: (1) Existing metrics do not adequately reflect intelligibility, and (2) while LLMs can refine ASR output, their effectiveness in correcting ASR transcripts of dysarthric speech remains underexplored. To address this, we propose a novel metric integrating Natural Language Inference (NLI) scores, semantic similarity, and phonetic similarity. Our ASR evaluation metric achieves a 0.890 correlation with human judgments on Speech Accessibility Project data, surpassing traditional methods and emphasizing the need to prioritize intelligibility over error-based measures.

Related papers

• SpeechIQ: Speech Intelligence Quotient Across Cognitive Levels in Voice Understanding Large Language Models [76.07833875692722]
  Speech-based Intelligence Quotient (SIQ) is a new form of human cognition-inspired evaluation pipeline for voice understanding large language models.<n>Our framework represents a first-of-its-kind intelligence examination that bridges cognitive principles with voice-oriented benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T15:12:06Z)
• Contextual ASR Error Handling with LLMs Augmentation for Goal-Oriented Conversational AI [27.56203179880491]
  General-purpose automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems do not always perform well in goal-oriented dialogue.<n>We extend correction to tasks that have no prior user data and exhibit linguistic flexibility such as lexical and syntactic variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T17:35:06Z)
• Lost in Transcription: Identifying and Quantifying the Accuracy Biases of Automatic Speech Recognition Systems Against Disfluent Speech [0.0]
  Speech recognition systems fail to accurately interpret speech patterns deviating from typical fluency, leading to critical usability issues and misinterpretations. This study evaluates six leading ASRs, analyzing their performance on both a real-world dataset of speech samples from individuals who stutter and a synthetic dataset derived from the widely-used LibriSpeech benchmark. Results reveal a consistent and statistically significant accuracy bias across all ASRs against disfluent speech, manifesting in significant syntactical and semantic inaccuracies in transcriptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T00:16:58Z)
• Toward Practical Automatic Speech Recognition and Post-Processing: a Call for Explainable Error Benchmark Guideline [12.197453599489963]
  We propose the development of an Error Explainable Benchmark (EEB) dataset. This dataset, while considering both speech- and text-level, enables a granular understanding of the model's shortcomings. Our proposition provides a structured pathway for a more real-world-centric' evaluation, allowing for the detection and rectification of nuanced system weaknesses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T03:42:45Z)
• Towards ASR Robust Spoken Language Understanding Through In-Context Learning With Word Confusion Networks [68.79880423713597]
  We introduce a method that utilizes the ASR system's lattice output instead of relying solely on the top hypothesis. Our in-context learning experiments, covering spoken question answering and intent classification, underline the LLM's resilience to noisy speech transcripts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-05T17:58:10Z)
• ML-LMCL: Mutual Learning and Large-Margin Contrastive Learning for Improving ASR Robustness in Spoken Language Understanding [55.39105863825107]
  We propose Mutual Learning and Large-Margin Contrastive Learning (ML-LMCL) to improve automatic speech recognition (ASR) robustness. In fine-tuning, we apply mutual learning and train two SLU models on the manual transcripts and the ASR transcripts, respectively. Experiments on three datasets show that ML-LMCL outperforms existing models and achieves new state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-19T16:53:35Z)
• HyPoradise: An Open Baseline for Generative Speech Recognition with Large Language Models [81.56455625624041]
  We introduce the first open-source benchmark to utilize external large language models (LLMs) for ASR error correction. The proposed benchmark contains a novel dataset, HyPoradise (HP), encompassing more than 334,000 pairs of N-best hypotheses. LLMs with reasonable prompt and its generative capability can even correct those tokens that are missing in N-best list.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T14:44:10Z)
• Pre-training for Spoken Language Understanding with Joint Textual and Phonetic Representation Learning [4.327558819000435]
  We propose a novel joint textual-phonetic pre-training approach for learning spoken language representations. Experimental results on spoken language understanding benchmarks, Fluent Speech Commands and SNIPS, show that the proposed approach significantly outperforms strong baseline models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-21T05:19:13Z)
• Improving Readability for Automatic Speech Recognition Transcription [50.86019112545596]
  We propose a novel NLP task called ASR post-processing for readability (APR) APR aims to transform the noisy ASR output into a readable text for humans and downstream tasks while maintaining the semantic meaning of the speaker. We compare fine-tuned models based on several open-sourced and adapted pre-trained models with the traditional pipeline method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-09T09:26:42Z)
• Joint Contextual Modeling for ASR Correction and Language Understanding [60.230013453699975]
  We propose multi-task neural approaches to perform contextual language correction on ASR outputs jointly with language understanding (LU) We show that the error rates of off the shelf ASR and following LU systems can be reduced significantly by 14% relative with joint models trained using small amounts of in-domain data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-28T22:09:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.