Modeling Public Perceptions of Science in Media

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16622v2
• Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 18:13:52 GMT
• Title: Modeling Public Perceptions of Science in Media
• Authors: Jiaxin Pei, Dustin Wright, Isabelle Augenstein, David Jurgens,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a computational framework that models public perception across twelve dimensions, such as newsworthiness, importance, and surprisingness.<n>We create a large-scale science news perception dataset with 10,489 annotations from 2,101 participants from diverse US and UK populations.<n>We develop NLP models that predict public perception scores with a strong performance.
• Score: 49.096529873255385
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Effectively engaging the public with science is vital for fostering trust and understanding in our scientific community. Yet, with an ever-growing volume of information, science communicators struggle to anticipate how audiences will perceive and interact with scientific news. In this paper, we introduce a computational framework that models public perception across twelve dimensions, such as newsworthiness, importance, and surprisingness. Using this framework, we create a large-scale science news perception dataset with 10,489 annotations from 2,101 participants from diverse US and UK populations, providing valuable insights into public responses to scientific information across domains. We further develop NLP models that predict public perception scores with a strong performance. Leveraging the dataset and model, we examine public perception of science from two perspectives: (1) Perception as an outcome: What factors affect the public perception of scientific information? (2) Perception as a predictor: Can we use the estimated perceptions to predict public engagement with science? We find that individuals' frequency of science news consumption is the driver of perception, whereas demographic factors exert minimal influence. More importantly, through a large-scale analysis and carefully designed natural experiment on Reddit, we demonstrate that the estimated public perception of scientific information has direct connections with the final engagement pattern. Posts with more positive perception scores receive significantly more comments and upvotes, which is consistent across different scientific information and for the same science, but are framed differently. Overall, this research underscores the importance of nuanced perception modeling in science communication, offering new pathways to predict public interest and engagement with scientific content.

Related papers

• ScienceMeter: Tracking Scientific Knowledge Updates in Language Models [79.33626657942169]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to support scientific research, but their knowledge of scientific advancements can quickly become outdated.<n>We introduce ScienceMeter, a new framework for evaluating scientific knowledge update methods over scientific knowledge spanning the past, present, and future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T07:28:20Z)
• Understanding Fine-grained Distortions in Reports of Scientific Findings [46.96512578511154]
  Distorted science communication harms individuals and society as it can lead to unhealthy behavior change and decrease trust in scientific institutions. Given the rapidly increasing volume of science communication in recent years, a fine-grained understanding of how findings from scientific publications are reported to the general public is crucial.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T19:00:01Z)
• Forecasting high-impact research topics via machine learning on evolving knowledge graphs [0.6906005491572401]
  We show how to predict the impact of onsets of ideas that have never been published by researchers.<n>We developed a large evolving knowledge graph built from more than 21 million scientific papers.<n>Using machine learning, we can predict the dynamic of the evolving network into the future with high accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T18:09:38Z)
• Network Analysis of the iNaturalist Citizen Science Community [0.6118897979046375]
  We use the iNaturalist citizen science platform as a case study to analyze the structure of citizen science projects. We propose a novel unique benchmark for network science research by using the iNaturalist data to create a network which has an unusual structure relative to other common benchmark networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T00:41:13Z)
• Flexible social inference facilitates targeted social learning when rewards are not observable [58.762004496858836]
  Groups coordinate more effectively when individuals are able to learn from others' successes. We suggest that social inference capacities may help bridge this gap, allowing individuals to update their beliefs about others' underlying knowledge and success from observable trajectories of behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T21:04:03Z)
• Modeling Information Change in Science Communication with Semantically Matched Paraphrases [50.67030449927206]
  SPICED is the first paraphrase dataset of scientific findings annotated for degree of information change. SPICED contains 6,000 scientific finding pairs extracted from news stories, social media discussions, and full texts of original papers. Models trained on SPICED improve downstream performance on evidence retrieval for fact checking of real-world scientific claims.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T07:44:38Z)
• A Computational Inflection for Scientific Discovery [48.176406062568674]
  We stand at the foot of a significant inflection in the trajectory of scientific discovery. As society continues on its fast-paced digital transformation, so does humankind's collective scientific knowledge. Computer science is poised to ignite a revolution in the scientific process itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T11:36:54Z)
• Attention: to Better Stand on the Shoulders of Giants [34.5017808610466]
  This paper develops an attention mechanism for the long-term scientific impact prediction. It validates the method based on a real large-scale citation data set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-27T00:25:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.