From Lab to Factory: Pitfalls and Guidelines for Self-/Unsupervised Defect Detection on Low-Quality Industrial Images

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16890v1
• Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:28:00 GMT
• Title: From Lab to Factory: Pitfalls and Guidelines for Self-/Unsupervised Defect Detection on Low-Quality Industrial Images
• Authors: Sebastian Hönel, Jonas Nordqvist,
• Abstract summary: Machine learning has the potential to replace manual handling.<n>Most methods do not handle low data quality well or exude low robustness in unfavorable, but typical real-world settings.<n>We evaluate two types of state-of-the-art models that allow us to identify and improve quality issues in production data.
• Score: 1.8185814461140655
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The detection and localization of quality-related problems in industrially mass-produced products has historically relied on manual inspection, which is costly and error-prone. Machine learning has the potential to replace manual handling. As such, the desire is to facilitate an unsupervised (or self-supervised) approach, as it is often impossible to specify all conceivable defects ahead of time. A plethora of prior works have demonstrated the aptitude of common reconstruction-, embedding-, and synthesis-based methods in laboratory settings. However, in practice, we observe that most methods do not handle low data quality well or exude low robustness in unfavorable, but typical real-world settings. For practitioners it may be very difficult to identify the actual underlying problem when such methods underperform. Worse, often-reported metrics (e.g., AUROC) are rarely suitable in practice and may give misleading results. In our setting, we attempt to identify subtle anomalies on the surface of blasted forged metal parts, using rather low-quality RGB imagery only, which is a common industrial setting. We specifically evaluate two types of state-of-the-art models that allow us to identify and improve quality issues in production data, without having to obtain new data. Our contribution is to provide guardrails for practitioners that allow them to identify problems related to, e.g., (lack of) robustness or invariance, in either the chosen model or the data reliably in similar scenarios. Furthermore, we exemplify common pitfalls in and shortcomings of likelihood-based approaches and outline a framework for proper empirical risk estimation that is more suitable for real-world scenarios.

Related papers

• ISP-AD: A Large-Scale Real-World Dataset for Advancing Industrial Anomaly Detection with Synthetic and Real Defects [0.0]
  Industrial Screen Printing Anomaly Detection dataset (ISP-AD)<n>ISP-AD is the largest publicly available industrial dataset to date, including both synthetic and real defects collected directly from the factory floor.<n>Experiments on a mixed supervised training approach, incorporating both synthesized and real defects, were conducted.<n>Research findings indicate that supervision by means of both synthetic and accumulated real defects can complement each other, meeting demanded industrial inspection requirements such as low false positive rates and high recall.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T21:56:31Z)
• A Comprehensive Library for Benchmarking Multi-class Visual Anomaly Detection [52.228708947607636]
  This paper introduces a comprehensive visual anomaly detection benchmark, ADer, which is a modular framework for new methods. The benchmark includes multiple datasets from industrial and medical domains, implementing fifteen state-of-the-art methods and nine comprehensive metrics. We objectively reveal the strengths and weaknesses of different methods and provide insights into the challenges and future directions of multi-class visual anomaly detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T13:40:07Z)
• Condition Monitoring with Incomplete Data: An Integrated Variational Autoencoder and Distance Metric Framework [2.7898966850590625]
  This paper introduces a new method for fault detection and condition monitoring for unseen data. We use a variational autoencoder to capture the probabilistic distribution of previously seen and new unseen conditions. Faults are detected by establishing a threshold for the health indexes, allowing the model to identify severe, unseen faults with high accuracy, even amidst noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T22:20:23Z)
• Self-supervised Feature Adaptation for 3D Industrial Anomaly Detection [59.41026558455904]
  We focus on multi-modal anomaly detection. Specifically, we investigate early multi-modal approaches that attempted to utilize models pre-trained on large-scale visual datasets. We propose a Local-to-global Self-supervised Feature Adaptation (LSFA) method to finetune the adaptors and learn task-oriented representation toward anomaly detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-06T07:30:41Z)
• Distributional Instance Segmentation: Modeling Uncertainty and High Confidence Predictions with Latent-MaskRCNN [77.0623472106488]
  In this paper, we explore a class of distributional instance segmentation models using latent codes. For robotic picking applications, we propose a confidence mask method to achieve the high precision necessary. We show that our method can significantly reduce critical errors in robotic systems, including our newly released dataset of ambiguous scenes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T05:57:29Z)
• Few-shot incremental learning in the context of solar cell quality inspection [0.0]
  In this work, we have explored the technique of weight imprinting in the context of solar cell quality inspection. The results have shown that this technique allows the network to extend its knowledge with regard to defect classes with few samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-01T23:52:07Z)
• Diagnosing failures of fairness transfer across distribution shift in real-world medical settings [60.44405686433434]
  Diagnosing and mitigating changes in model fairness under distribution shift is an important component of the safe deployment of machine learning in healthcare settings. We show that this knowledge can help diagnose failures of fairness transfer, including cases where real-world shifts are more complex than is often assumed in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-02T13:59:23Z)
• Monitoring Model Deterioration with Explainable Uncertainty Estimation via Non-parametric Bootstrap [0.0]
  Monitoring machine learning models once they are deployed is challenging. It is even more challenging to decide when to retrain models in real-case scenarios when labeled data is beyond reach. In this work, we use non-parametric bootstrapped uncertainty estimates and SHAP values to provide explainable uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-27T17:23:04Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Tracking the risk of a deployed model and detecting harmful distribution shifts [105.27463615756733]
  In practice, it may make sense to ignore benign shifts, under which the performance of a deployed model does not degrade substantially. We argue that a sensible method for firing off a warning has to both (a) detect harmful shifts while ignoring benign ones, and (b) allow continuous monitoring of model performance without increasing the false alarm rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T17:21:41Z)
• Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning [78.83598532168256]
  Marginal-likelihood based model-selection is rarely used in deep learning due to estimation difficulties. Our work shows that marginal likelihoods can improve generalization and be useful when validation data is unavailable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T09:50:24Z)
• Identifying Causal-Effect Inference Failure with Uncertainty-Aware Models [41.53326337725239]
  We introduce a practical approach for integrating uncertainty estimation into a class of state-of-the-art neural network methods. We show that our methods enable us to deal gracefully with situations of "no-overlap", common in high-dimensional data. We show that correctly modeling uncertainty can keep us from giving overconfident and potentially harmful recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-01T00:37:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.