PostAlign: Multimodal Grounding as a Corrective Lens for MLLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.17901v1
• Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 05:11:46 GMT
• Title: PostAlign: Multimodal Grounding as a Corrective Lens for MLLMs
• Authors: Yixuan Wu, Yang Zhang, Jian Wu, Philip Torr, Jindong Gu,
• Abstract summary: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel in vision-language tasks, such as image captioning and visual question answering.<n>They often suffer from over-reliance on spurious correlations, primarily due to linguistic priors that distract the model from leveraging actual visual information.<n>We introduce MMed-PostAlign, a post-multimodal alignment framework designed to enhance the visual understanding capabilities and mitigate the hallucinations of MLLMs.
• Score: 23.69973859198496
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel in vision-language tasks, such as image captioning and visual question answering. However, they often suffer from over-reliance on spurious correlations, primarily due to linguistic priors that distract the model from leveraging actual visual information. To address these issues, we introduce MMGrounded-PostAlign, a post-multimodal alignment framework designed to enhance the visual understanding capabilities and mitigate the hallucinations of MLLMs. Our framework incorporates a multimodal grounding module for both visual grounding, which identifies the referred object in the image, and textual grounding, which generates the rationale for the final answer, ensuring that outputs are anchored in both visual and textual evidence. To mitigate the hallucinations, we introduce a negative rejection mechanism in the visual grounding module to distinguish grounded entities from non-existent objects influenced by linguistic biases. On the textual grounding side, we propose a selective reasoning mechanism that adjusts the model's reasoning strategy based on query complexity. Extensive evaluations are conducted on benchmarks such as POPE, HaloQuest, VQAv2, MME, and MMBench showing significant improvements in fine-grained visual understanding and hallucination suppression.

Related papers

• MIRAGE: Assessing Hallucination in Multimodal Reasoning Chains of MLLM [58.2298313720146]
  Multimodal hallucinations are multi-sourced and arise from diverse causes.<n>Existing benchmarks fail to adequately distinguish between perception-induced hallucinations and reasoning-induced hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T05:54:36Z)
• Decoupled Visual Interpretation and Linguistic Reasoning for Math Problem Solving [57.22004912994658]
  Current large vision-language models (LVLMs) typically employ a connector module to link visual features with text embeddings of large language models (LLMs)<n>This paper proposes a paradigm shift: instead of training end-to-end vision-language reasoning models, we advocate for developing a decoupled reasoning framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T08:18:00Z)
• Grounded Chain-of-Thought for Multimodal Large Language Models [66.04061083611863]
  We propose a new learning task for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) called Grounded Chain-of-Thought (GCoT)<n>GCoT is keen to helping MLLMs to recognize and ground the relevant visual cues step by step, thereby predicting the correct answer with grounding coordinates as the intuitive basis.<n>To facilitate this task, we also carefully design and construct a dataset called multimodal grounded chain-of-thought (MM-GCoT) consisting of 24,022 GCoT examples for 5,033 images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T04:07:47Z)
• Thinking Before Looking: Improving Multimodal LLM Reasoning via Mitigating Visual Hallucination [13.706325901731665]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have advanced the integration of visual and linguistic modalities. Current approaches like chain of thought (CoT) reasoning have augmented the cognitive capabilities of large language models (LLMs) But their adaptation to MLLMs is hindered by heightened risks of hallucination in cross-modality comprehension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T21:01:37Z)
• MR-MLLM: Mutual Reinforcement of Multimodal Comprehension and Vision Perception [24.406224705072763]
  Mutually Reinforced Multimodal Large Language Model (MR-MLLM) is a novel framework that enhances visual perception and multimodal comprehension. First, a shared query fusion mechanism is proposed to harmonize detailed visual inputs from vision models with the linguistic depth of language models. Second, we propose the perception-enhanced cross-modal integration method, incorporating novel modalities from vision perception outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-22T07:10:36Z)
• Plug-and-Play Grounding of Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models [6.695747085909927]
  We introduce P2G, a novel framework for plug-and-play grounding in MLLMs. P2G employs expert agents for on-the-fly grounding of reasoning into critical visual and textual elements in images. We develop P2GB, a benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' proficiency in understanding inter-object relationships and textual content in challenging high-resolution images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T11:26:30Z)
• Multi-modal Instruction Tuned LLMs with Fine-grained Visual Perception [63.03288425612792]
  We propose bfAnyRef, a general MLLM model that can generate pixel-wise object perceptions and natural language descriptions from multi-modality references. Our model achieves state-of-the-art results across multiple benchmarks, including diverse modality referring segmentation and region-level referring expression generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T13:45:46Z)
• Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs [50.77984109941538]
  Our research reveals that the visual capabilities in recent multimodal LLMs still exhibit systematic shortcomings. We identify ''CLIP-blind pairs'' - images that CLIP perceives as similar despite their clear visual differences. We evaluate various CLIP-based vision-and-language models and found a notable correlation between visual patterns that challenge CLIP models and those problematic for multimodal LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-11T18:58:36Z)
• Behind the Magic, MERLIM: Multi-modal Evaluation Benchmark for Large Image-Language Models [50.653838482083614]
  This paper introduces a scalable test-bed to assess the capabilities of IT-LVLMs on fundamental computer vision tasks.<n> MERLIM contains over 300K image-question pairs and has a strong focus on detecting cross-modal "hallucination" events in IT-LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T16:39:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.