The Syntactic Acceptability Dataset (Preview): A Resource for Machine Learning and Linguistic Analysis of English

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18120v1
• Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 18:03:49 GMT
• Title: The Syntactic Acceptability Dataset (Preview): A Resource for Machine Learning and Linguistic Analysis of English
• Authors: Tom S Juzek,
• Abstract summary: We present a preview of the Syntactic Acceptability dataset.<n>The dataset comprises 1,000 English sequences from the syntactic discourse.<n>Even in its preliminary form, this dataset stands as the largest of its kind that is publicly accessible.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: We present a preview of the Syntactic Acceptability Dataset, a resource being designed for both syntax and computational linguistics research. In its current form, the dataset comprises 1,000 English sequences from the syntactic discourse: Half from textbooks and half from the journal Linguistic Inquiry, the latter to ensure a representation of the contemporary discourse. Each entry is labeled with its grammatical status ("well-formedness" according to syntactic formalisms) extracted from the literature, as well as its acceptability status ("intuitive goodness" as determined by native speakers) obtained through crowdsourcing, with highest experimental standards. Even in its preliminary form, this dataset stands as the largest of its kind that is publicly accessible. We also offer preliminary analyses addressing three debates in linguistics and computational linguistics: We observe that grammaticality and acceptability judgments converge in about 83% of the cases and that "in-betweenness" occurs frequently. This corroborates existing research. We also find that while machine learning models struggle with predicting grammaticality, they perform considerably better in predicting acceptability. This is a novel finding. Future work will focus on expanding the dataset.

Related papers

• Languages in Multilingual Speech Foundation Models Align Both Phonetically and Semantically [58.019484208091534]
  Cross-lingual alignment in pretrained language models (LMs) has enabled efficient transfer in text-based LMs.<n>It remains an open question whether findings and methods from text-based cross-lingual alignment apply to speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T07:21:20Z)
• Large corpora and large language models: a replicable method for automating grammatical annotation [0.0]
  We introduce a methodological pipeline applied to the case study of formal variation in the English evaluative verb construction 'consider X (as) (to be) Y'<n>We reach a model accuracy of over 90% on our held-out test samples with only a small amount of training data.<n>We discuss the generalisability of our results for a wider range of case studies of grammatical constructions and grammatical variation and change.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T03:29:48Z)
• Learning Phonotactics from Linguistic Informants [54.086544221761486]
  Our model iteratively selects or synthesizes a data-point according to one of a range of information-theoretic policies. We find that the information-theoretic policies that our model uses to select items to query the informant achieve sample efficiency comparable to, or greater than, fully supervised approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T00:18:56Z)
• Disco-Bench: A Discourse-Aware Evaluation Benchmark for Language Modelling [70.23876429382969]
  We propose a benchmark that can evaluate intra-sentence discourse properties across a diverse set of NLP tasks. Disco-Bench consists of 9 document-level testsets in the literature domain, which contain rich discourse phenomena. For linguistic analysis, we also design a diagnostic test suite that can examine whether the target models learn discourse knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T15:18:25Z)
• Syntax and Semantics Meet in the "Middle": Probing the Syntax-Semantics Interface of LMs Through Agentivity [68.8204255655161]
  We present the semantic notion of agentivity as a case study for probing such interactions. This suggests LMs may potentially serve as more useful tools for linguistic annotation, theory testing, and discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T16:24:01Z)
• A Linguistic Investigation of Machine Learning based Contradiction Detection Models: An Empirical Analysis and Future Perspectives [0.34998703934432673]
  We analyze two Natural Language Inference data sets with respect to their linguistic features. The goal is to identify those syntactic and semantic properties that are particularly hard to comprehend for a machine learning model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-19T10:06:03Z)
• A Latent-Variable Model for Intrinsic Probing [93.62808331764072]
  We propose a novel latent-variable formulation for constructing intrinsic probes. We find empirical evidence that pre-trained representations develop a cross-lingually entangled notion of morphosyntax.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-20T15:01:12Z)
• The Rediscovery Hypothesis: Language Models Need to Meet Linguistics [8.293055016429863]
  We study whether linguistic knowledge is a necessary condition for good performance of modern language models. We show that language models that are significantly compressed but perform well on their pretraining objectives retain good scores when probed for linguistic structures. This result supports the rediscovery hypothesis and leads to the second contribution of our paper: an information-theoretic framework that relates language modeling objective with linguistic information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-02T15:57:39Z)
• Infusing Finetuning with Semantic Dependencies [62.37697048781823]
  We show that, unlike syntax, semantics is not brought to the surface by today's pretrained models. We then use convolutional graph encoders to explicitly incorporate semantic parses into task-specific finetuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T01:27:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.