The Role of Partisan Culture in Mental Health Language Online
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20377v1
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 12:44:10 GMT
- Title: The Role of Partisan Culture in Mental Health Language Online
- Authors: Sachin R. Pendse, Ben Rochford, Neha Kumar, Munmun De Choudhury,
- Abstract summary: We present a large-scale observational study of 2,184,356 posts from 8,916 statistically matched Republican, Democrat, and unaffiliated online support community members.<n>We find that partisan culture does play into expressions of distress, underscoring the importance of considering partisan cultural differences in the design of online support community platforms.
- Score: 32.60242402941811
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The impact of culture on how people express distress in online support communities is increasingly a topic of interest within Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). In the United States, distinct cultures have emerged from each of the two dominant political parties, forming a primary lens by which people navigate online and offline worlds. We examine whether partisan culture may play a role in how U.S. Republican and Democrat users of online mental health support communities express distress. We present a large-scale observational study of 2,184,356 posts from 8,916 statistically matched Republican, Democrat, and unaffiliated online support community members. We utilize methods from causal inference to statistically match partisan users along covariates that correspond with demographic attributes and platform use, in order to create comparable cohorts for analysis. We then leverage methods from natural language processing to understand how partisan expressions of distress compare between these sets of closely matched opposing partisans, and between closely matched partisans and typical support community members. Our data spans January 2013 to December 2022, a period of both rising political polarization and mental health concerns. We find that partisan culture does play into expressions of distress, underscoring the importance of considering partisan cultural differences in the design of online support community platforms.
Related papers
- Polarized Patterns of Language Toxicity and Sentiment of Debunking Posts on Social Media [5.301808480190602]
The rise of misinformation and fake news in online political discourse poses significant challenges to democratic processes and public engagement.<n>We examined over 86 million debunking tweets and more than 4 million Reddit debunking comments to investigate the relationship between language toxicity, pessimism, and social polarization in debunking efforts.<n>We show that platform architecture affects informational complexity of user interactions, with Twitter promoting concentrated, uniform discourse and Reddit encouraging diverse, complex communication.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-10T08:00:58Z) - Physical partisan proximity outweighs online ties in predicting US voting outcomes [4.479309784918059]
Affective polarization and increasing social divisions affect social mixing and the spread of information across online and physical spaces.
We compare three dimensions of partisan exposure: physical proximity and exposure to the same social contexts, online social ties, and residential sorting.
Our results show that physical partisan proximity is the best predictor of voting patterns in swing counties, where the election results are most uncertain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T20:02:18Z) - Moral consensus and divergence in partisan language use [0.0]
Polarization has increased substantially in political discourse, contributing to a widening partisan divide.
We analyzed large-scale, real-world language use in Reddit communities and in news outlets to uncover psychological dimensions along which partisan language is divided.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-14T16:50:26Z) - Computational Assessment of Hyperpartisanship in News Titles [55.92100606666497]
We first adopt a human-guided machine learning framework to develop a new dataset for hyperpartisan news title detection.
Overall the Right media tends to use proportionally more hyperpartisan titles.
We identify three major topics including foreign issues, political systems, and societal issues that are suggestive of hyperpartisanship in news titles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-16T05:56:58Z) - Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online
political polarization [58.720142291102135]
A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations.
This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - Characterizing Partisan Political Narratives about COVID-19 on Twitter [2.5599656137521425]
We characterize and compare the pandemic narratives of the Democratic and Republican politicians on social media.
By analyzing tweets from the politicians in the U.S., we uncover the contrasting narratives in terms of topics, frames, and agents.
Our findings concretely expose the gaps in the "elusive consensus" between the two parties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-11T21:24:41Z) - Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to
misinformation [71.46564239895892]
We analyze the relationship between partisanship, echo chambers, and vulnerability to online misinformation by studying news sharing behavior on Twitter.
We find that vulnerability to misinformation is most strongly influenced by partisanship for both left- and right-leaning users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-04T01:36:14Z) - Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online
platforms [2.66512000865131]
We develop a methodology to quantify the positioning of online communities along social dimensions.
Applying our methodology to 5.1B Reddit comments made in 10K communities over 14 years, we measure how the macroscale community structure is organized.
We find Reddit underwent a significant polarization event around the 2016 U.S. presidential election, and remained highly polarized for years afterward.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-01T17:59:40Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.