Zero-Shot Learning for Obsolescence Risk Forecasting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21240v1
• Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:57 GMT
• Title: Zero-Shot Learning for Obsolescence Risk Forecasting
• Authors: Elie Saad, Aya Mrabah, Mariem Besbes, Marc Zolghadri, Victor Czmil, Claude Baron, Vincent Bourgeois,
• Abstract summary: obsolescence risk prediction is essential but hindered by a lack of reliable data.<n>This paper proposes a novel approach to forecasting obsolescence risk using zero-shot learning (ZSL) with large language models (LLMs)
• Score: 0.08376229126363229
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Component obsolescence poses significant challenges in industries reliant on electronic components, causing increased costs and disruptions in the security and availability of systems. Accurate obsolescence risk prediction is essential but hindered by a lack of reliable data. This paper proposes a novel approach to forecasting obsolescence risk using zero-shot learning (ZSL) with large language models (LLMs) to address data limitations by leveraging domain-specific knowledge from tabular datasets. Applied to two real-world datasets, the method demonstrates effective risk prediction. A comparative evaluation of four LLMs underscores the importance of selecting the right model for specific forecasting tasks.

Related papers

• LLM4MEA: Data-free Model Extraction Attacks on Sequential Recommenders via Large Language Models [50.794651919028965]
  Recent studies have demonstrated the vulnerability of sequential recommender systems to Model Extraction Attacks (MEAs)<n>Black-box attacks in prior MEAs are ineffective at exposing recommender system vulnerabilities due to random sampling in data selection.<n>We propose LLM4MEA, a novel model extraction method that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) as human-like rankers to generate data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T19:20:23Z)
• Underestimated Privacy Risks for Minority Populations in Large Language Model Unlearning [20.018234150653885]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) embed sensitive, human-generated data, prompting the need for unlearning methods.<n>We introduce a complementary, minority-aware evaluation framework to highlight blind spots in existing frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T17:22:07Z)
• Data Advisor: Dynamic Data Curation for Safety Alignment of Large Language Models [79.65071553905021]
  We propose Data Advisor, a method for generating data that takes into account the characteristics of the desired dataset. Data Advisor monitors the status of the generated data, identifies weaknesses in the current dataset, and advises the next iteration of data generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T17:59:58Z)
• Enhancing Data Quality through Self-learning on Imbalanced Financial Risk Data [11.910955398918444]
  This study investigates data pre-processing techniques to enhance existing financial risk datasets. We introduce TriEnhance, a straightforward technique that entails: (1) generating synthetic samples specifically tailored to the minority class, (2) filtering using binary feedback to refine samples, and (3) self-learning with pseudo-labels. Our experiments reveal the efficacy of TriEnhance, with a notable focus on improving minority class calibration, a key factor for developing more robust financial risk prediction systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T16:59:15Z)
• Outside the Comfort Zone: Analysing LLM Capabilities in Software Vulnerability Detection [9.652886240532741]
  This paper thoroughly analyses large language models' capabilities in detecting vulnerabilities within source code. We evaluate the performance of six open-source models that are specifically trained for vulnerability detection against six general-purpose LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T10:00:57Z)
• Low-rank finetuning for LLMs: A fairness perspective [54.13240282850982]
  Low-rank approximation techniques have become the de facto standard for fine-tuning Large Language Models. This paper investigates the effectiveness of these methods in capturing the shift of fine-tuning datasets from the initial pre-trained data distribution. We show that low-rank fine-tuning inadvertently preserves undesirable biases and toxic behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T20:43:53Z)
• Understanding Privacy Risks of Embeddings Induced by Large Language Models [75.96257812857554]
  Large language models show early signs of artificial general intelligence but struggle with hallucinations. One promising solution is to store external knowledge as embeddings, aiding LLMs in retrieval-augmented generation. Recent studies experimentally showed that the original text can be partially reconstructed from text embeddings by pre-trained language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T13:10:48Z)
• Unveiling the Misuse Potential of Base Large Language Models via In-Context Learning [61.2224355547598]
  Open-sourcing of large language models (LLMs) accelerates application development, innovation, and scientific progress. Our investigation exposes a critical oversight in this belief. By deploying carefully designed demonstrations, our research demonstrates that base LLMs could effectively interpret and execute malicious instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T13:22:54Z)
• The Frontier of Data Erasure: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [56.26002631481726]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are foundational to AI advancements. LLMs pose risks by potentially memorizing and disseminating sensitive, biased, or copyrighted information. Machine unlearning emerges as a cutting-edge solution to mitigate these concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-23T09:26:15Z)
• Safe Deployment for Counterfactual Learning to Rank with Exposure-Based Risk Minimization [63.93275508300137]
  We introduce a novel risk-aware Counterfactual Learning To Rank method with theoretical guarantees for safe deployment. Our experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed method, which is effective at avoiding initial periods of bad performance when little data is available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-26T15:54:23Z)
• Detecting and Mitigating Test-time Failure Risks via Model-agnostic Uncertainty Learning [30.86992077157326]
  This paper introduces Risk Advisor, a novel post-hoc meta-learner for estimating failure risks and predictive uncertainties of any already-trained black-box classification model. In addition to providing a risk score, the Risk Advisor decomposes the uncertainty estimates into aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty components. Experiments on various families of black-box classification models and on real-world and synthetic datasets show that the Risk Advisor reliably predicts deployment-time failure risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-09T17:23:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.