Learning Truthful Mechanisms without Discretization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22911v1
• Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 14:50:29 GMT
• Title: Learning Truthful Mechanisms without Discretization
• Authors: Yunxuan Ma, Siqiang Wang, Zhijian Duan, Yukun Cheng, Xiaotie Deng,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces TEDI, a discretization-free algorithm to learn truthful and utility-maximizing mechanisms.<n>We formalize the concept of pricing rules, defined as functions that map outcomes to prices.<n>Based on this concept, we propose a novel menu mechanism, which can be equivalent to a truthful direct mechanism under specific conditions.
• Score: 6.47853785922226
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper introduces TEDI (Truthful, Expressive, and Dimension-Insensitive approach), a discretization-free algorithm to learn truthful and utility-maximizing mechanisms. Existing learning-based approaches often rely on discretization of outcome spaces to ensure truthfulness, which leads to inefficiency with increasing problem size. To address this limitation, we formalize the concept of pricing rules, defined as functions that map outcomes to prices. Based on this concept, we propose a novel menu mechanism, which can be equivalent to a truthful direct mechanism under specific conditions. The core idea of TEDI lies in its parameterization of pricing rules using Partial GroupMax Network, a new network architecture designed to universally approximate partial convex functions. To learn optimal pricing rules, we develop novel training techniques, including covariance trick and continuous sampling, to derive unbiased gradient estimators compatible with first-order optimization. Theoretical analysis establishes that TEDI guarantees truthfulness, full expressiveness, and dimension-insensitivity. Experimental evaluation in the studied auction setting demonstrates that TEDI achieves strong performance, competitive with or exceeding state-of-the-art methods. This work presents the first approaches to learn truthful mechanisms without outcome discretization, thereby enhancing algorithmic efficiency. The proposed concepts, network architecture, and learning techniques might offer potential value and provide new insights for automated mechanism design and differentiable economics.

Related papers

• EKPC: Elastic Knowledge Preservation and Compensation for Class-Incremental Learning [53.88000987041739]
  Class-Incremental Learning (CIL) aims to enable AI models to continuously learn from sequentially arriving data of different classes over time.<n>We propose the Elastic Knowledge Preservation and Compensation (EKPC) method, integrating Importance-aware importance Regularization (IPR) and Trainable Semantic Drift Compensation (TSDC) for CIL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T05:19:58Z)
• Towards Understanding the Optimization Mechanisms in Deep Learning [5.281849820329249]
  In this paper, we adopt a distribution estimation perspective to explore the mechanisms of supervised classification using deep neural networks.<n>For the latter, we provide theoretical insights into mechanisms such as over- and probability randomization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-29T08:46:13Z)
• Interval Abstractions for Robust Counterfactual Explanations [15.954944873701503]
  Counterfactual Explanations (CEs) have emerged as a major paradigm in explainable AI research. Existing methods often become invalid when slight changes occur in the parameters of the model they were generated for. We propose a novel interval abstraction technique for machine learning models, which allows us to obtain provable robustness guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-21T18:24:34Z)
• Ensemble Kalman Filtering Meets Gaussian Process SSM for Non-Mean-Field and Online Inference [47.460898983429374]
  We introduce an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) into the non-mean-field (NMF) variational inference framework to approximate the posterior distribution of the latent states. This novel marriage between EnKF and GPSSM not only eliminates the need for extensive parameterization in learning variational distributions, but also enables an interpretable, closed-form approximation of the evidence lower bound (ELBO) We demonstrate that the resulting EnKF-aided online algorithm embodies a principled objective function by ensuring data-fitting accuracy while incorporating model regularizations to mitigate overfitting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T15:22:30Z)
• Making Linear MDPs Practical via Contrastive Representation Learning [101.75885788118131]
  It is common to address the curse of dimensionality in Markov decision processes (MDPs) by exploiting low-rank representations. We consider an alternative definition of linear MDPs that automatically ensures normalization while allowing efficient representation learning. We demonstrate superior performance over existing state-of-the-art model-based and model-free algorithms on several benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-14T18:18:02Z)
• Stabilizing Q-learning with Linear Architectures for Provably Efficient Learning [53.17258888552998]
  This work proposes an exploration variant of the basic $Q$-learning protocol with linear function approximation. We show that the performance of the algorithm degrades very gracefully under a novel and more permissive notion of approximation error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T23:26:51Z)
• MACE: An Efficient Model-Agnostic Framework for Counterfactual Explanation [132.77005365032468]
  We propose a novel framework of Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanation (MACE) In our MACE approach, we propose a novel RL-based method for finding good counterfactual examples and a gradient-less descent method for improving proximity. Experiments on public datasets validate the effectiveness with better validity, sparsity and proximity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T04:57:06Z)
• Pessimism meets VCG: Learning Dynamic Mechanism Design via Offline Reinforcement Learning [114.36124979578896]
  We design a dynamic mechanism using offline reinforcement learning algorithms. Our algorithm is based on the pessimism principle and only requires a mild assumption on the coverage of the offline data set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T05:44:26Z)
• Efficiently Disentangle Causal Representations [37.1087310583588]
  We approximate the difference with models' generalization abilities so that it fits in the standard machine learning framework. In contrast to the state-of-the-art approach, which relies on the learner's adaptation speed to new distribution, the proposed approach only requires evaluating the model's generalization ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-06T07:12:36Z)
• Optimization-Inspired Learning with Architecture Augmentations and Control Mechanisms for Low-Level Vision [74.9260745577362]
  This paper proposes a unified optimization-inspired learning framework to aggregate Generative, Discriminative, and Corrective (GDC) principles. We construct three propagative modules to effectively solve the optimization models with flexible combinations. Experiments across varied low-level vision tasks validate the efficacy and adaptability of GDC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T03:24:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.