On the polemic assessment of what Bell did
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22915v1
- Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 14:59:16 GMT
- Title: On the polemic assessment of what Bell did
- Authors: Justo Pastor Lambare,
- Abstract summary: Despite their Nobel Prize-winning empirical falsification, the interpretation of the Bell inequality remains a subject of controversy.<n>This article discusses and attempts to clarify the reasons John S. Bell and A. Einstein claimed that quantum entanglement implies puzzling nonlocal correlations.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Despite their Nobel Prize-winning empirical falsification, the interpretation of the Bell inequality remains a subject of controversy. This article discusses and attempts to clarify the reasons John S. Bell and A. Einstein claimed that quantum entanglement implies puzzling nonlocal correlations that Einstein famously termed ``spooky action at a distance.'' The issue remains highly controversial and has roughly divided the scientific community into localists and nonlocalists. Without taking a stance for either side in the long-standing, polarized debate, we examine Bell's actual argument, highlighting the differences between his approach and the current orthodoxy.
Related papers
- Time evolution of randomness in Bell's experiment indicates 'Realism' is false [41.94295877935867]
We measure time evolution of Minimum Entropy and (estimated) Kolmogorov's Complexity of binary time series during short pulses.<n>We compare evolution between the cases with stations placed close and separated 24m in straight line.<n>This provides a clue about which one of the hypotheses necessary for the derivation and observation of Bell's inequalities is false.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-04T20:39:15Z) - Time series and the meaning of quantum non-locality [55.2480439325792]
The derivation of Bell's inequalities gives precise meaning to the idea of quantum non-locality.
It also makes evident why using it for faster than light signaling is impossible.
It is demonstrated that series of outcomes, even if they violate Bell's inequalities, can be always embedded in a set of factual and counter-factual data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-21T14:49:47Z) - Bell's inequality and the spooky actions at a distance [0.0]
This article is mainly intended for undergraduate physics students.
It places special emphasis on clarifying the meaning and scope of Bell's theorem in the context of the Einstein-Podolski-Rosen experiment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-01T16:36:26Z) - Bell vs Bell: a ding-dong battle over quantum incompleteness [0.0]
John Bell gave the first demonstration that quantum mechanics is incompatible with local hidden variables.
This paper aims to bring clarity to the debate via simple examples and rigorous results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-27T11:11:28Z) - Optimizing Fictitious States for Bell Inequality Violation in Bipartite Qubit Systems [5.151248813215795]
We show that if Bell inequality violation is observed with a fictitious state, then it implies the same for a quantum sub-state.
We further show analytically that the basis which diagonalizes the spin-spin correlations is optimal for constructing fictitious states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T18:05:44Z) - Is a spectrograph of hidden variables possible? [91.3755431537592]
"Spectrograph's Realism", and "Locality", are proven to be different, and both necessary, hypotheses to derive Bell's inequalities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-28T13:59:08Z) - The Bell experiment; an epistemological approach [0.0]
The Nobel prize in physics for 2022 was given for performing Bell experiments with varying degree of sophistication.
It is argued that any independent observer must have a limitation.
A related new approach to the foundation of quantum mechanics is briefly sketched.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-21T10:31:33Z) - My discussions with John Stuart Bell [0.0]
In 1976, I met John Bell several times in CERN and we talked about a possible violation of optical theorem, purity tests, EPR paradox, Bell inequalities and their violation.
I also reproduce handwritten notes, which I gave to Bell during our first meeting and a handwritten letter he sent to me in 1982.
The research stimulated by Bell papers and experiments performed to check his inequalities led to several important applications of quantum entanglement in quantum information and quantum technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-30T13:25:13Z) - Spin-1 photons, spin-1/2 electrons, Bell's inequalities, and Feynman's
special perspective on quantum mechanics [0.0]
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox that argues for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics as a description of physical reality has been put to rest by John Bell's famous theorem.
We discuss several variants of the Bell inequalities and explore the ways in which they demolish the arguments in favor of local hidden-variable theories.
We also examine the roots of Feynman's attitude toward Bell's theorem in the context of Feynman's special perspective on quantum mechanics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-07T07:14:59Z) - Exploring the boundary of quantum correlations with a time-domain optical processor [16.003717185276052]
We derive a GHZ-type paradox with a context-cover number of three and show this number saturates the lower bound posed by quantum theory.<n>By proposing and studying a strong form of contextuality in high-dimensional Hilbert space, our results pave the way for the exploration of exotic quantum correlations with time-multiplexed optical systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-16T15:12:42Z) - Bell nonlocality in networks [62.997667081978825]
Bell's theorem proves that quantum theory is inconsistent with local physical models.
In the last decade, the investigation of nonlocality has moved beyond Bell's theorem to consider more sophisticated experiments.
This review discusses the main concepts, methods, results and future challenges in the emerging topic of Bell nonlocality in networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-21T18:00:48Z) - Non-Boolean Hidden Variables model reproduces Quantum Mechanics'
predictions for Bell's experiment [91.3755431537592]
Theory aimed to violate Bell's inequalities must start by giving up Boolean logic.
"Hard" problem is to predict the time values when single particles are detected.
"Soft" problem is to explain the violation of Bell's inequalities within (non-Boolean) Local Realism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-20T21:46:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.