Modular versus Hierarchical: A Structural Signature of Topic Popularity in Mathematical Research

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22946v1
• Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 16:39:57 GMT
• Title: Modular versus Hierarchical: A Structural Signature of Topic Popularity in Mathematical Research
• Authors: Brian Hepler,
• Abstract summary: We study how the popularity of a research topic is associated with the structure of that topic's collaboration network.<n>Our findings suggest that topic selection is an implicit choice between two fundamentally different collaborative environments.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Mathematical researchers, especially those in early-career positions, face critical decisions about topic specialization with limited information about the collaborative environments of different research areas. The aim of this paper is to study how the popularity of a research topic is associated with the structure of that topic's collaboration network, as observed by a suite of measures capturing organizational structure at several scales. We apply these measures to 1,938 algorithmically discovered topics across 121,391 papers sourced from arXiv metadata during the period 2020--2025. Our analysis, which controls for the confounding effects of network size, reveals a structural dichotomy--we find that popular topics organize into modular "schools of thought," while niche topics maintain hierarchical core-periphery structures centered around established experts. This divide is not an artifact of scale, but represents a size-independent structural pattern correlated with popularity. We also document a "constraint reversal": after controlling for size, researchers in popular fields face greater structural constraints on collaboration opportunities, contrary to conventional expectations. Our findings suggest that topic selection is an implicit choice between two fundamentally different collaborative environments, each with distinct implications for a researcher's career. To make these structural patterns transparent to the research community, we developed the Math Research Compass (https://mathresearchcompass.com), an interactive platform providing data on topic popularity and collaboration patterns across mathematical topics.

Related papers

• A Hybrid AI Methodology for Generating Ontologies of Research Topics from Scientific Paper Corpora [6.384357773998868]
  Sci-OG is a semi-auto-mated methodology for generating research topic.<n>This paper presents Sci-OG, a semi-auto-mated methodology for generating research topic.<n>We evaluate this approach against a range of alternative solutions using a dataset of 21,649 manually annotated semantic triples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T08:48:14Z)
• Improving Community Detection in Academic Networks by Handling Publication Bias [0.0]
  We build a topic-based research network using BERTopic with a fine-tuned SciBERT model.<n>A major challenge we address is publication imbalance, where some researchers publish much more than others.<n>We introduce a cloning strategy that clusters a researcher's publications and treats each cluster as a separate node.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T00:48:33Z)
• Personalized Generation In Large Model Era: A Survey [90.7579254803302]
  In the era of large models, content generation is gradually shifting to Personalized Generation (PGen)<n>This paper presents the first comprehensive survey on PGen, investigating existing research in this rapidly growing field.<n>By bridging PGen research across multiple modalities, this survey serves as a valuable resource for fostering knowledge sharing and interdisciplinary collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T13:34:19Z)
• Automatic Detection of Research Values from Scientific Abstracts Across Computer Science Subfields [32.82061305764996]
  It is crucial to explore what specific research values, known as basic and fundamental beliefs that guide or motivate research attitudes or actions.<n>Prior research has manually analyzed research values from a small sample of machine learning papers.<n>This paper introduces a detailed annotation scheme featuring ten research values that guide CS-related research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-23T00:44:27Z)
• The Geometric Structure of Topic Models [0.0]
  Despite their widespread use in research and application, an in-depth analysis of topic models is still an open research topic. We propose an incidence-geometric method for deriving an ordinal structure from flat topic models. We present a new visualization paradigm for concept hierarchies based on ordinal motifs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T10:53:51Z)
• AHAM: Adapt, Help, Ask, Model -- Harvesting LLMs for literature mining [3.8384235322772864]
  We present the AHAM' methodology and a metric that guides the domain-specific textbfadaptation of the BERTopic topic modeling framework. By utilizing the LLaMa2 generative language model, we generate topic definitions via one-shot learning. For inter-topic similarity evaluation, we leverage metrics from language generation and translation processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-25T18:23:03Z)
• Incremental hierarchical text clustering methods: a review [49.32130498861987]
  This study aims to analyze various hierarchical and incremental clustering techniques. The main contribution of this research is the organization and comparison of the techniques used by studies published between 2010 and 2018 that aimed to texts documents clustering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T22:27:29Z)
• Contrast Pattern Mining: A Survey [54.06874773607785]
  It is difficult for new researchers in the field to understand the general situation of the field in a short period of time. First, we present an in-depth understanding of CPM, including basic concepts, types, mining strategies, and metrics for assessing discriminative ability. We classify CPM methods according to their characteristics into boundary-based algorithms, tree-based algorithms, evolutionary fuzzy system-based algorithms, decision tree-based algorithms, and other algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-27T17:11:12Z)
• Knowledge-Aware Bayesian Deep Topic Model [50.58975785318575]
  We propose a Bayesian generative model for incorporating prior domain knowledge into hierarchical topic modeling. Our proposed model efficiently integrates the prior knowledge and improves both hierarchical topic discovery and document representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-20T09:16:05Z)
• Research Topic Flows in Co-Authorship Networks [0.0]
  We propose a graph structure for the analysis of research topic flows between scientific authors and their respective research fields. Our method requires for the construction of a TFN solely a corpus of publications (i.e., author and abstract information) We demonstrate the utility of TFNs by applying our method to two comprehensive corpora of altogether 20 Mio. publications spanning more than 60 years of research in the fields computer science and mathematics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T07:45:53Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Clustering: Taxonomy, Challenges, and Future Directions [48.97008907275482]
  Clustering is a fundamental machine learning task which has been widely studied in the literature. Deep Clustering, i.e., jointly optimizing the representation learning and clustering, has been proposed and hence attracted growing attention in the community. We summarize the essential components of deep clustering and categorize existing methods by the ways they design interactions between deep representation learning and clustering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T15:05:13Z)
• Author Clustering and Topic Estimation for Short Texts [69.54017251622211]
  We propose a novel model that expands on the Latent Dirichlet Allocation by modeling strong dependence among the words in the same document. We also simultaneously cluster users, removing the need for post-hoc cluster estimation. Our method performs as well as -- or better -- than traditional approaches to problems arising in short text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T20:55:55Z)
• Evaluating the state-of-the-art in mapping research spaces: a Brazilian case study [0.0]
  Two recent works propose methods for creating research maps from scientists' publication records. We evaluate these models' ability to predict whether a given entity will enter a new field. We conduct a case study to showcase how these models can be used to characterize science dynamics in the context of Brazil.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T18:14:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.