MARBLE: A Hard Benchmark for Multimodal Spatial Reasoning and Planning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22992v1
• Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 19:44:32 GMT
• Title: MARBLE: A Hard Benchmark for Multimodal Spatial Reasoning and Planning
• Authors: Yulun Jiang, Yekun Chai, Maria Brbić, Michael Moor,
• Abstract summary: The ability to process information from multiple modalities and to reason through it step-by-step remains a critical challenge in advancing artificial intelligence.<n>Here, we present MARBLE, a challenging multimodal reasoning benchmark that is designed to scrutinize multimodal language models.<n>We find that current MLLMs perform poorly on MARBLE -- all the 12 advanced models obtain near-random performance on M-Portal and 0% accuracy on M-Cube.
• Score: 10.602434753538535
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The ability to process information from multiple modalities and to reason through it step-by-step remains a critical challenge in advancing artificial intelligence. However, existing reasoning benchmarks focus on text-only reasoning, or employ multimodal questions that can be answered by directly retrieving information from a non-text modality. Thus, complex reasoning remains poorly understood in multimodal domains. Here, we present MARBLE, a challenging multimodal reasoning benchmark that is designed to scrutinize multimodal language models (MLLMs) in their ability to carefully reason step-by-step through complex multimodal problems and environments. MARBLE is composed of two highly challenging tasks, M-Portal and M-Cube, that require the crafting and understanding of multistep plans under spatial, visual, and physical constraints. We find that current MLLMs perform poorly on MARBLE -- all the 12 advanced models obtain near-random performance on M-Portal and 0% accuracy on M-Cube. Only in simplified subtasks some models outperform the random baseline, indicating that complex reasoning is still a challenge for existing MLLMs. Moreover, we show that perception remains a bottleneck, where MLLMs occasionally fail to extract information from the visual inputs. By shedding a light on the limitations of MLLMs, we hope that MARBLE will spur the development of the next generation of models with the ability to reason and plan across many, multimodal reasoning steps.

Related papers

• MMReason: An Open-Ended Multi-Modal Multi-Step Reasoning Benchmark for MLLMs Toward AGI [59.196131618912005]
  Reasoning plays a crucial role in advancing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>Existing MLLM benchmarks often fall short in precisely and comprehensively evaluating long-chain reasoning abilities.<n>We introduce MMReason, a new benchmark designed to precisely and comprehensively evaluate MLLM long-chain reasoning capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T07:14:38Z)
• MLLMs are Deeply Affected by Modality Bias [158.64371871084478]
  Recent advances in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown promising results in integrating diverse modalities such as texts and images.<n>MLLMs are heavily influenced by modality bias, often relying on language while under-utilizing other modalities like visual inputs.<n>This paper argues that MLLMs are deeply affected by modality bias, highlighting its manifestations across various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T11:49:31Z)
• Grounded Chain-of-Thought for Multimodal Large Language Models [66.04061083611863]
  We propose a new learning task for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) called Grounded Chain-of-Thought (GCoT)<n>GCoT is keen to helping MLLMs to recognize and ground the relevant visual cues step by step, thereby predicting the correct answer with grounding coordinates as the intuitive basis.<n>To facilitate this task, we also carefully design and construct a dataset called multimodal grounded chain-of-thought (MM-GCoT) consisting of 24,022 GCoT examples for 5,033 images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T04:07:47Z)
• Multimodal Inconsistency Reasoning (MMIR): A New Benchmark for Multimodal Reasoning Models [26.17300490736624]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are predominantly trained and tested on consistent visual-textual inputs.<n>We propose the Multimodal Inconsistency Reasoning benchmark to assess MLLMs' ability to detect and reason about semantic mismatches.<n>We evaluate six state-of-the-art MLLMs, showing that models with dedicated multimodal reasoning capabilities, such as o1, substantially outperform their counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-22T01:52:37Z)
• Can MLLMs Reason in Multimodality? EMMA: An Enhanced MultiModal ReAsoning Benchmark [73.27104042215207]
  We introduce EMMA, a benchmark targeting organic multimodal reasoning across mathematics, physics, chemistry, and coding.<n>EMMA tasks demand advanced cross-modal reasoning that cannot be addressed by reasoning independently in each modality.<n>Our evaluation of state-of-the-art MLLMs on EMMA reveals significant limitations in handling complex multimodal and multi-step reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T18:55:52Z)
• Benchmarking Large and Small MLLMs [71.78055760441256]
  Large multimodal language models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable advancements in understanding and generating multimodal content.<n>However, their deployment faces significant challenges, including slow inference, high computational cost, and impracticality for on-device applications.<n>Small MLLMs, exemplified by the LLava-series models and Phi-3-Vision, offer promising alternatives with faster inference, reduced deployment costs, and the ability to handle domain-specific scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-04T07:44:49Z)
• Improving Mathematical Reasoning Capabilities of Small Language Models via Feedback-Driven Distillation [15.542737858152053]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional reasoning capabilities, often achieving state-of-the-art performance in various tasks. A promising solution is knowledge distillation, where LLMs transfer reasoning capabilities to Small Language Models (SLMs), enabling wider deployment on low-resource devices. We propose a Feedback-Driven Distillation (FDD) framework to enhance SLMs' mathematical reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-22T03:12:39Z)
• A Comprehensive Review of Multimodal Large Language Models: Performance and Challenges Across Different Tasks [74.52259252807191]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) address the complexities of real-world applications far beyond the capabilities of single-modality systems. This paper systematically sorts out the applications of MLLM in multimodal tasks such as natural language, vision, and audio.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T15:14:53Z)
• Quantifying and Mitigating Unimodal Biases in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Causal Perspective [9.633811630889237]
  We propose a causal framework to interpret the biases in Visual Question Answering (VQA) problems. We introduce a novel dataset with 12,000 challenging VQA instances requiring multi-hop reasoning. Our experiments show that MLLMs perform poorly on MORE, indicating strong unimodal biases and limited semantic understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T08:38:49Z)
• The Curious Case of Nonverbal Abstract Reasoning with Multi-Modal Large Language Models [19.213774611556]
  Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) integrate verbal and visual information. Despite the revolutionizing prospect of MLLMs, our understanding of their reasoning abilities is limited. In this study, we assess the nonverbal abstract reasoning abilities of open-source and closed-source MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T16:57:05Z)
• A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models [71.63375558033364]
  Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) represented by GPT-4V has been a new rising research hotspot.<n>This paper aims to trace and summarize the recent progress of MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T15:21:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.