Just Noticeable Difference for Large Multimodal Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00490v2
• Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 13:58:48 GMT
• Title: Just Noticeable Difference for Large Multimodal Models
• Authors: Zijian Chen, Yuan Tian, Yuze Sun, Wei Sun, Zicheng Zhang, Weisi Lin, Guangtao Zhai, Wenjun Zhang,
• Abstract summary: Just noticeable difference (JND) is the minimum change that the human visual system (HVS) can perceive.<n>We take an initial attempt and demonstrate that there exist significant visual blind spots in current LMMs.<n>Our research underscores the significance of LMM-JND as a unique perspective for studying LMMs.
• Score: 70.41467229325345
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Just noticeable difference (JND), the minimum change that the human visual system (HVS) can perceive, has been studied for decades. Although recent work has extended this line of research into machine vision, there has been a scarcity of studies systematically exploring its perceptual boundaries across multiple tasks and stimulus types, particularly in the current era of rapidly advancing large multimodal models (LMMs), where studying the multifaceted capabilities of models has become a mainstream focus. Moreover, the perceptual defects of LMMs are not investigated thoroughly, resulting in potential security issues and suboptimal response efficiency. In this paper, we take an initial attempt and demonstrate that there exist significant visual blind spots in current LMMs. To systemically quantify this characteristic, we propose a new concept, {\bf LMM-JND}, together with its determination pipeline. Targeting uncovering the behavior commonalities in HVS-aligned visual perception tasks, we delve into several LMM families and construct a large-scale dataset, named VPA-JND, which contains 21.5k reference images with over 489k stimuli across 12 distortion types, to facilitate LMM-JND studies. VPA-JND exposes areas where state-of-the-art LMMs, including GPT-4o and the InternVL2.5 series, struggle with basic comparison queries and fall significantly short of human-level visual performance. We further explore the effects of vision and language backbones and find a notable correlation between their design philosophy that may instruct the future refinement of LMMs for their visual acuity. Together, our research underscores the significance of LMM-JND as a unique perspective for studying LMMs, and predictable LMM-JND is crucial for security concerns. This work will be available at https://github.com/zijianchen98/LMM-JND.

Related papers

• Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Fine-Grained Image Tasks: A Comprehensive Evaluation [53.84282335629258]
  We introduce a comprehensive fine-grained evaluation benchmark, i.e., FG-BMK, comprising 1.01 million questions and 0.33 million images.<n>Our evaluation systematically examines LVLMs from both human-oriented and machine-oriented perspectives.<n>We uncover key findings regarding the influence of training paradigms, modality alignment, perturbation susceptibility, and fine-grained category reasoning on task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T09:30:41Z)
• VisFactor: Benchmarking Fundamental Visual Cognition in Multimodal Large Language Models [62.667142971664575]
  We introduce VisFactor, a novel benchmark derived from the Factor-Referenced Cognitive Test (FRCT)<n>VisFactor digitalizes vision-related FRCT subtests to systematically evaluate MLLMs across essential visual cognitive tasks.<n>We present a comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art MLLMs, such as GPT-4o, Gemini-Pro, and Qwen-VL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-23T04:21:32Z)
• The Curse of Multi-Modalities: Evaluating Hallucinations of Large Multimodal Models across Language, Visual, and Audio [118.75449542080746]
  This paper presents the first systematic investigation of hallucinations in large multimodal models (LMMs) Our study reveals two key contributors to hallucinations: overreliance on unimodal priors and spurious inter-modality correlations. Our findings highlight key vulnerabilities, including imbalances in modality integration and biases from training data, underscoring the need for balanced cross-modal learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T17:59:02Z)
• Lumen: Unleashing Versatile Vision-Centric Capabilities of Large Multimodal Models [87.47400128150032]
  We propose a novel LMM architecture named Lumen, a Large multimodal model with versatile vision-centric capability enhancement. Lumen first promotes fine-grained vision-language concept alignment. Then the task-specific decoding is carried out by flexibly routing the shared representation to lightweight task decoders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T04:13:45Z)
• VRPTEST: Evaluating Visual Referring Prompting in Large Multimodal Models [19.32035955420203]
  We conduct the first comprehensive analysis of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) using a variety of visual referring prompting strategies. We develop an automated assessment framework to evaluate the accuracy of LMMs without the need for human intervention or manual labeling. We find that the current proprietary models generally outperform the open-source ones, showing an average accuracy improvement of 22.70%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T06:53:55Z)
• Myriad: Large Multimodal Model by Applying Vision Experts for Industrial Anomaly Detection [86.24898024621008]
  We present a novel large multimodal model applying vision experts for industrial anomaly detection(abbreviated to Myriad)<n>We utilize the anomaly map generated by the vision experts as guidance for LMMs, such that the vision model is guided to pay more attention to anomalous regions.<n>Our proposed method not only performs favorably against state-of-the-art methods, but also inherits the flexibility and instruction-following ability of LMMs in the field of IAD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T16:49:45Z)
• An Empirical Study of Scaling Instruct-Tuned Large Multimodal Models [116.50367506746713]
  We present an empirical study of scaling LLaVA up to 33B and 65B/70B. We find that scaling LMM consistently enhances model performance and improves language capabilities. We hope that this study makes state-of-the-art LMM research at a larger scale more accessible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T17:30:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.