Is It Safe To Learn And Share? On Psychological Safety and Social Learning in (Agile) Communities of Practice

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01065v1
• Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 19:06:43 GMT
• Title: Is It Safe To Learn And Share? On Psychological Safety and Social Learning in (Agile) Communities of Practice
• Authors: Christiaan Verwijs, Evelien Acun-Roos, Daniel Russo,
• Abstract summary: Communities of Practice (CoPs) are increasingly adopted to support social learning beyond formal education.<n> psychological safety, a prerequisite for effective learning, remains insufficiently understood in these settings.<n>This study investigates psychological safety within Agile CoPs through survey data from 143 participants.
• Score: 4.662447283600293
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As hybrid, distributed, and asynchronous work models become more prevalent, continuous learning in Agile Software Development (ASD) gains renewed importance. Communities of Practice (CoPs) are increasingly adopted to support social learning beyond formal education, often relying on virtual communication. Psychological safety, a prerequisite for effective learning, remains insufficiently understood in these settings. This mixed-methods study investigates psychological safety within Agile CoPs through survey data from 143 participants. Results indicate that psychological safety is significantly lower in online interactions compared to face-to-face settings. Moreover, low psychological safety reduces participants' intent to continue contributing and avoidance of interpersonal risk. No significant differences emerged based on gender, community seniority, or content creation activity. However, differences by role and age group suggest potential generational or role-related effects. Thematic analysis revealed exclusionary behavior, negative interaction patterns, and hostility as primary threats to psychological safety, often reinforced by tribalism and specific community dynamics. Suggested interventions include establishing explicit norms, structured facilitation, and active moderation. The findings were validated through member checking with 30 participants. This study provides a comparative perspective on interaction modalities and offers practical guidance for organizers seeking to cultivate inclusive, high-impact CoPs and similarly structured virtual or hybrid work environments.

Related papers

• The Role of Generative AI in Facilitating Social Interactions: A Scoping Review [0.0]
  Reduced social connectedness poses a threat to mental health, life expectancy, and general well-being.<n>Generative AI (GAI) technologies, such as large language models (LLMs) and image generation tools, are increasingly integrated into applications aimed at enhancing human social experiences.<n>Despite their growing presence, little is known about how these technologies influence social interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T17:37:19Z)
• Safe to Stay: Psychological Safety Sustains Participation in Pull-based Open Source Projects [9.312605205492456]
  Psychological safety refers to the belief that team members can speak up or make mistakes without fear of negative consequences.<n>This study investigates whether team-level psychological safety is associated with contributors' sustained participation in open-source projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T12:54:30Z)
• Virtual Agent-Based Communication Skills Training to Facilitate Health Persuasion Among Peers [1.8408516054528479]
  We present an approach that uses virtual agents to coach community-based volunteers in health counseling techniques.<n>We use this approach in a virtual agent-based system to increase COVID-19 vaccination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T18:34:32Z)
• SoK (or SoLK?): On the Quantitative Study of Sociodemographic Factors and Computer Security Behaviors [31.18834611268347]
  We survey existing scholarship on sociodemographics and secure behavior. We then conduct a focused literature review of 47 papers to synthesize what is currently known and identify open questions for future research. By incorporating contemporary social and critical theories, we establish guidelines for future studies of sociodemographic factors and security behaviors. We present a case study to demonstrate our guidelines in action, at-scale, that conduct a measurement study of the relationships between sociodemographics and de-identified, aggregated log data of security and privacy behaviors among 16,829 users on Facebook across 16 countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T23:56:03Z)
• Dynamics of Moral Behavior in Heterogeneous Populations of Learning Agents [3.7414804164475983]
  We study the learning dynamics of morally heterogeneous populations interacting in a social dilemma setting.<n>We observe several types of non-trivial interactions between pro-social and anti-social agents.<n>We find that certain types of moral agents are able to steer selfish agents towards more cooperative behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T04:12:24Z)
• PsySafe: A Comprehensive Framework for Psychological-based Attack, Defense, and Evaluation of Multi-agent System Safety [70.84902425123406]
  Multi-agent systems, when enhanced with Large Language Models (LLMs), exhibit profound capabilities in collective intelligence. However, the potential misuse of this intelligence for malicious purposes presents significant risks. We propose a framework (PsySafe) grounded in agent psychology, focusing on identifying how dark personality traits in agents can lead to risky behaviors. Our experiments reveal several intriguing phenomena, such as the collective dangerous behaviors among agents, agents' self-reflection when engaging in dangerous behavior, and the correlation between agents' psychological assessments and dangerous behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T12:11:55Z)
• AntEval: Evaluation of Social Interaction Competencies in LLM-Driven Agents [65.16893197330589]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to replicate human behaviors across a wide range of scenarios. However, their capability in handling complex, multi-character social interactions has yet to be fully explored. We introduce the Multi-Agent Interaction Evaluation Framework (AntEval), encompassing a novel interaction framework and evaluation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T11:18:00Z)
• Flexible social inference facilitates targeted social learning when rewards are not observable [58.762004496858836]
  Groups coordinate more effectively when individuals are able to learn from others' successes. We suggest that social inference capacities may help bridge this gap, allowing individuals to update their beliefs about others' underlying knowledge and success from observable trajectories of behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T21:04:03Z)
• Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A Survey [71.43956423427397]
  We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance. This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings. Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z)
• Incorporating Rivalry in Reinforcement Learning for a Competitive Game [65.2200847818153]
  This study focuses on providing a novel learning mechanism based on a rivalry social impact. Based on the concept of competitive rivalry, our analysis aims to investigate if we can change the assessment of these agents from a human perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T21:54:18Z)
• Social Engagement versus Learning Engagement -- An Exploratory Study of FutureLearn Learners [61.58283466715385]
  Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) continue to see increasing enrolment, but only a small percent of enrolees completes the MOOCs. This study is particularly concerned with how learners interact with peers, along with their study progression in MOOCs. The study was conducted on the less explored FutureLearn platform, which employs a social constructivist approach and promotes collaborative learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-11T16:09:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.