PBa-LLM: Privacy- and Bias-aware NLP using Named-Entity Recognition (NER)

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02966v2
• Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 08:02:08 GMT
• Title: PBa-LLM: Privacy- and Bias-aware NLP using Named-Entity Recognition (NER)
• Authors: Gonzalo Mancera, Aythami Morales, Julian Fierrez, Ruben Tolosana, Alejandro Penna, Miguel Lopez-Duran, Francisco Jurado, Alvaro Ortigosa,
• Abstract summary: This work explores the use of Named- Entity Recognition (NER) to facilitate the privacy-preserving training of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose a framework that uses NER technologies to anonymize sensitive information in text data, such as personal identities or geographic locations.<n>The study involved two language models (BERT and RoBERTa) and six anonymization algorithms (based on Presidio, FLAIR, BERT, and different versions of GPT) applied to a database of 24,000 candidate profiles.
• Score: 45.870212237420226
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) in highstakes AI-based applications has increased significantly in recent years, especially since the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, despite their strong performance, LLMs introduce important legal/ ethical concerns, particularly regarding privacy, data protection, and transparency. Due to these concerns, this work explores the use of Named- Entity Recognition (NER) to facilitate the privacy-preserving training (or adaptation) of LLMs. We propose a framework that uses NER technologies to anonymize sensitive information in text data, such as personal identities or geographic locations. An evaluation of the proposed privacy-preserving learning framework was conducted to measure its impact on user privacy and system performance in a particular high-stakes and sensitive setup: AI-based resume scoring for recruitment processes. The study involved two language models (BERT and RoBERTa) and six anonymization algorithms (based on Presidio, FLAIR, BERT, and different versions of GPT) applied to a database of 24,000 candidate profiles. The findings indicate that the proposed privacy preservation techniques effectively maintain system performance while playing a critical role in safeguarding candidate confidentiality, thus promoting trust in the experimented scenario. On top of the proposed privacy-preserving approach, we also experiment applying an existing approach that reduces the gender bias in LLMs, thus finally obtaining our proposed Privacyand Bias-aware LLMs (PBa-LLMs). Note that the proposed PBa-LLMs have been evaluated in a particular setup (resume scoring), but are generally applicable to any other LLM-based AI application.

Related papers

• Addressing Bias in LLMs: Strategies and Application to Fair AI-based Recruitment [49.81946749379338]
  This work seeks to analyze the capacity of Transformers-based systems to learn demographic biases present in the data.<n>We propose a privacy-enhancing framework to reduce gender information from the learning pipeline as a way to mitigate biased behaviors in the final tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T15:29:43Z)
• Urania: Differentially Private Insights into AI Use [104.7449031243196]
  $Urania$ provides end-to-end privacy protection by leveraging DP tools such as clustering, partition selection, and histogram-based summarization.<n>Results show the framework's ability to extract meaningful conversational insights while maintaining stringent user privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T07:00:31Z)
• PrivaCI-Bench: Evaluating Privacy with Contextual Integrity and Legal Compliance [44.287734754038254]
  We present PrivaCI-Bench, a contextual privacy evaluation benchmark for generative large language models (LLMs)<n>We evaluate the latest LLMs, including the recent reasoner models QwQ-32B and Deepseek R1.<n>Our experimental results suggest that though LLMs can effectively capture key CI parameters inside a given context, they still require further advancements for privacy compliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T10:49:34Z)
• Privacy-Preserving Large Language Models: Mechanisms, Applications, and Future Directions [0.0]
  This survey explores the landscape of privacy-preserving mechanisms tailored for large language models.<n>We examine their efficacy in addressing key privacy challenges, such as membership inference and model inversion attacks.<n>By synthesizing state-of-the-art approaches and future trends, this paper provides a foundation for developing robust, privacy-preserving large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T00:24:09Z)
• On Active Privacy Auditing in Supervised Fine-tuning for White-Box Language Models [7.275432177367344]
  Parsing is designed to identify and quantify privacy leakage risks during the supervised fine-tuning of language models (LMs) We have improved the effectiveness of white-box membership inference attacks (MIAs) on large LMs including GPT-2, Llama2, and certain variants of them. Our research aims to provide the SFT community of LMs with a reliable, ready-to-use privacy auditing tool, and to offer valuable insights into safeguarding privacy during the fine-tuning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T15:46:07Z)
• How Privacy-Savvy Are Large Language Models? A Case Study on Compliance and Privacy Technical Review [15.15468770348023]
  We evaluate large language models' performance in privacy-related tasks such as privacy information extraction (PIE), legal and regulatory key point detection (KPD), and question answering (QA)<n>Through an empirical assessment, we investigate the capacity of several prominent LLMs, including BERT, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and custom models, in executing privacy compliance checks and technical privacy reviews.<n>While LLMs show promise in automating privacy reviews and identifying regulatory discrepancies, significant gaps persist in their ability to fully comply with evolving legal standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T01:51:37Z)
• Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuning [62.224804688233]
  differential privacy (DP) offers a promising solution by ensuring models are 'almost indistinguishable' with or without any particular privacy unit. We study user-level DP motivated by applications where it necessary to ensure uniform privacy protection across users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:54:32Z)
• Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory [82.7042006247124]
  We show that even the most capable AI models reveal private information in contexts that humans would not, 39% and 57% of the time, respectively. Our work underscores the immediate need to explore novel inference-time privacy-preserving approaches, based on reasoning and theory of mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T04:15:30Z)
• Privacy Preserving Large Language Models: ChatGPT Case Study Based Vision and Framework [6.828884629694705]
  This article proposes the conceptual model called PrivChatGPT, a privacy-generative model for LLMs. PrivChatGPT consists of two main components i.e., preserving user privacy during the data curation/pre-processing together with preserving private context and the private training process for large-scale data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:55:13Z)
• PrivacyMind: Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners [81.571305826793]
  We introduce Contextual Privacy Protection Language Models (PrivacyMind) Our work offers a theoretical analysis for model design and benchmarks various techniques. In particular, instruction tuning with both positive and negative examples stands out as a promising method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T22:37:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.