Privacy Preserving Large Language Models: ChatGPT Case Study Based Vision and Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12523v1
• Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 06:55:13 GMT
• Title: Privacy Preserving Large Language Models: ChatGPT Case Study Based Vision and Framework
• Authors: Imdad Ullah, Najm Hassan, Sukhpal Singh Gill, Basem Suleiman, Tariq Ahamed Ahanger, Zawar Shah, Junaid Qadir, Salil S. Kanhere,
• Abstract summary: This article proposes the conceptual model called PrivChatGPT, a privacy-generative model for LLMs. PrivChatGPT consists of two main components i.e., preserving user privacy during the data curation/pre-processing together with preserving private context and the private training process for large-scale data.
• Score: 6.828884629694705
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools based on Large Language Models (LLMs) use billions of parameters to extensively analyse large datasets and extract critical private information such as, context, specific details, identifying information etc. This have raised serious threats to user privacy and reluctance to use such tools. This article proposes the conceptual model called PrivChatGPT, a privacy-preserving model for LLMs that consists of two main components i.e., preserving user privacy during the data curation/pre-processing together with preserving private context and the private training process for large-scale data. To demonstrate its applicability, we show how a private mechanism could be integrated into the existing model for training LLMs to protect user privacy; specifically, we employed differential privacy and private training using Reinforcement Learning (RL). We measure the privacy loss and evaluate the measure of uncertainty or randomness once differential privacy is applied. It further recursively evaluates the level of privacy guarantees and the measure of uncertainty of public database and resources, during each update when new information is added for training purposes. To critically evaluate the use of differential privacy for private LLMs, we hypothetically compared other mechanisms e..g, Blockchain, private information retrieval, randomisation, for various performance measures such as the model performance and accuracy, computational complexity, privacy vs. utility etc. We conclude that differential privacy, randomisation, and obfuscation can impact utility and performance of trained models, conversely, the use of ToR, Blockchain, and PIR may introduce additional computational complexity and high training latency. We believe that the proposed model could be used as a benchmark for proposing privacy preserving LLMs for generative AI tools.

Related papers

• FT-PrivacyScore: Personalized Privacy Scoring Service for Machine Learning Participation [4.772368796656325]
  In practice, controlled data access remains a mainstream method for protecting data privacy in many industrial and research environments. We developed the demo prototype FT-PrivacyScore to show that it's possible to efficiently and quantitatively estimate the privacy risk of participating in a model fine-tuning task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T02:41:26Z)
• Masked Differential Privacy [64.32494202656801]
  We propose an effective approach called masked differential privacy (DP), which allows for controlling sensitive regions where differential privacy is applied. Our method operates selectively on data and allows for defining non-sensitive-temporal regions without DP application or combining differential privacy with other privacy techniques within data samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T15:22:53Z)
• Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuning [62.224804688233]
  differential privacy (DP) offers a promising solution by ensuring models are 'almost indistinguishable' with or without any particular privacy unit. We study user-level DP motivated by applications where it necessary to ensure uniform privacy protection across users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:54:32Z)
• Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory [82.7042006247124]
  We show that even the most capable AI models reveal private information in contexts that humans would not, 39% and 57% of the time, respectively. Our work underscores the immediate need to explore novel inference-time privacy-preserving approaches, based on reasoning and theory of mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T04:15:30Z)
• PrivacyMind: Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners [81.571305826793]
  We introduce Contextual Privacy Protection Language Models (PrivacyMind) Our work offers a theoretical analysis for model design and benchmarks various techniques. In particular, instruction tuning with both positive and negative examples stands out as a promising method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T22:37:01Z)
• Position: Considerations for Differentially Private Learning with Large-Scale Public Pretraining [75.25943383604266]
  We question whether the use of large Web-scraped datasets should be viewed as differential-privacy-preserving. We caution that publicizing these models pretrained on Web data as "private" could lead to harm and erode the public's trust in differential privacy as a meaningful definition of privacy. We conclude by discussing potential paths forward for the field of private learning, as public pretraining becomes more popular and powerful.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T10:41:12Z)
• Just Fine-tune Twice: Selective Differential Privacy for Large Language Models [69.66654761324702]
  We propose a simple yet effective just-fine-tune-twice privacy mechanism to achieve SDP for large Transformer-based language models. Experiments show that our models achieve strong performance while staying robust to the canary insertion attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-15T22:36:55Z)
• Production of Categorical Data Verifying Differential Privacy: Conception and Applications to Machine Learning [0.0]
  Differential privacy is a formal definition that allows quantifying the privacy-utility trade-off. With the local DP (LDP) model, users can sanitize their data locally before transmitting it to the server. In all cases, we concluded that differentially private ML models achieve nearly the same utility metrics as non-private ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-02T12:50:14Z)
• Personalized PATE: Differential Privacy for Machine Learning with Individual Privacy Guarantees [1.2691047660244335]
  We propose three novel methods to support training an ML model with different personalized privacy guarantees within the training data. Our experiments show that our personalized privacy methods yield higher accuracy models than the non-personalized baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T20:16:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.