On the Mathematical Impossibility of Safe Universal Approximators

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03031v1
• Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2025 01:05:24 GMT
• Title: On the Mathematical Impossibility of Safe Universal Approximators
• Authors: Jasper Yao,
• Abstract summary: We prove that catastrophic failures are an inescapable feature of any useful computational system.<n>We prove this through a three-level argument that leaves no escape routes for any class of universal approximator architecture.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We establish fundamental mathematical limits on universal approximation theorem (UAT) system alignment by proving that catastrophic failures are an inescapable feature of any useful computational system. Our central thesis is that for any universal approximator, the expressive power required for useful computation is inextricably linked to a dense set of instabilities that make perfect, reliable control a mathematical impossibility. We prove this through a three-level argument that leaves no escape routes for any class of universal approximator architecture. i) Combinatorial Necessity: For the vast majority of practical universal approximators (e.g., those using ReLU activations), we prove that the density of catastrophic failure points is directly proportional to the network's expressive power. ii) Topological Necessity: For any theoretical universal approximator, we use singularity theory to prove that the ability to approximate generic functions requires the ability to implement the dense, catastrophic singularities that characterize them. iii) Empirical Necessity: We prove that the universal existence of adversarial examples is empirical evidence that real-world tasks are themselves catastrophic, forcing any successful model to learn and replicate these instabilities. These results, combined with a quantitative "Impossibility Sandwich" showing that the minimum complexity for usefulness exceeds the maximum complexity for safety, demonstrate that perfect alignment is not an engineering challenge but a mathematical impossibility. This foundational result reframes UAT safety from a problem of "how to achieve perfect control" to one of "how to operate safely in the presence of irreducible uncontrollability," with profound implications for the future of UAT development and governance.

Related papers

• The Alignment Trap: Complexity Barriers [0.0]
  This paper argues that AI alignment is not merely difficult, but is founded on a fundamental logical contradiction.<n>We first establish Theion Paradox: we use machine learning precisely because we cannot enumerate all necessary safety rules.<n>This paradox is then confirmed by a set of five independent mathematical proofs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T02:30:30Z)
• Towards provable probabilistic safety for scalable embodied AI systems [79.31011047593492]
  Embodied AI systems are increasingly prevalent across various applications.<n> Ensuring their safety in complex operating environments remains a major challenge.<n>This Perspective offers a pathway toward safer, large-scale adoption of embodied AI systems in safety-critical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T15:46:25Z)
• DeepTheorem: Advancing LLM Reasoning for Theorem Proving Through Natural Language and Reinforcement Learning [67.93945726549289]
  DeepTheorem is a comprehensive informal theorem-proving framework exploiting natural language to enhance mathematical reasoning.<n>DeepTheorem includes a large-scale benchmark dataset consisting of 121K high-quality IMO-level informal theorems and proofs.<n>We devise a novel reinforcement learning strategy (RL-Zero) explicitly tailored to informal theorem proving, leveraging the verified theorem variants to incentivize robust mathematical inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T17:59:39Z)
• The Theory of the Unique Latent Pattern: A Formal Epistemic Framework for Structural Singularity in Complex Systems [2.44755919161855]
  This paper introduces the Theory of the Unique Latent Pattern (ULP), a formal framework that redefines the origin of apparent complexity in dynamic systems.<n>Rather than attributing unpredictability to intrinsic randomness or emergent nonlinearity, ULP asserts that every analyzable system is governed by a structurally unique, deterministic generative mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T19:52:28Z)
• On relative universality, regression operator, and conditional independence [3.4759820813589966]
  We modify the definition of relative universality using the concept of ko-measurability.<n>The significance of this result is beyond its original context of sufficient dimension reduction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T10:12:26Z)
• A Probabilistic Neuro-symbolic Layer for Algebraic Constraint Satisfaction [13.245011236407166]
  In safety-critical applications, satisfaction of constraints linear continuous environments is crucial, e.g., an autonomous agent should never crash or go off-road.<n>We introduce different approximations that guarantee the satisfaction of non-junctionable constraints.<n>This formulation enables efficient and exact renormalization via symbolic integration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T08:58:04Z)
• Probabilistic computation and uncertainty quantification with emerging covariance [11.79594512851008]
  Building robust, interpretable, and secure AI system requires quantifying and representing uncertainty under a probabilistic perspective. Probability computation presents significant challenges for most conventional artificial neural network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T17:55:29Z)
• The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential Regression [72.30888739450343]
  A new approach with uncertainty-aware regression-based neural networks (NNs) shows promise over traditional deterministic methods and typical Bayesian NNs. We detail the theoretical shortcomings and analyze the performance on synthetic and real-world data sets, showing that Deep Evidential Regression is a quantification rather than an exact uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T10:10:32Z)
• Universal Regression with Adversarial Responses [26.308541799686505]
  We provide algorithms for regression with adversarial responses under large classes of non-i.i.d. instance sequences. We consider universal consistency which asks for strong consistency of a learner without restrictions on the value responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-09T22:10:30Z)
• Offline Reinforcement Learning: Fundamental Barriers for Value Function Approximation [74.3002974673248]
  We consider the offline reinforcement learning problem, where the aim is to learn a decision making policy from logged data. offline RL is becoming increasingly relevant in practice, because online data collection is well suited to safety-critical domains. Our results show that sample-efficient offline reinforcement learning requires either restrictive coverage conditions or representation conditions that go beyond complexity learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-21T23:22:37Z)
• On dissipative symplectic integration with applications to gradient-based optimization [77.34726150561087]
  We propose a geometric framework in which discretizations can be realized systematically. We show that a generalization of symplectic to nonconservative and in particular dissipative Hamiltonian systems is able to preserve rates of convergence up to a controlled error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T00:36:49Z)
• Polynomial-Time Exact MAP Inference on Discrete Models with Global Dependencies [83.05591911173332]
  junction tree algorithm is the most general solution for exact MAP inference with run-time guarantees. We propose a new graph transformation technique via node cloning which ensures a run-time for solving our target problem independently of the form of a corresponding clique tree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-27T13:30:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.