Lessons from a Chimp: AI "Scheming" and the Quest for Ape Language

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03409v1
• Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2025 09:16:11 GMT
• Title: Lessons from a Chimp: AI "Scheming" and the Quest for Ape Language
• Abstract summary: We examine recent research that asks whether current AI systems may be developing a capacity for "scheming"<n>We compare current research practices in this field to those adopted in the 1970s to test whether non-human primates could master natural language.<n>We recommend that research into AI scheming actively seeks to avoid these pitfalls.
• Score: 6.363408523327004
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We examine recent research that asks whether current AI systems may be developing a capacity for "scheming" (covertly and strategically pursuing misaligned goals). We compare current research practices in this field to those adopted in the 1970s to test whether non-human primates could master natural language. We argue that there are lessons to be learned from that historical research endeavour, which was characterised by an overattribution of human traits to other agents, an excessive reliance on anecdote and descriptive analysis, and a failure to articulate a strong theoretical framework for the research. We recommend that research into AI scheming actively seeks to avoid these pitfalls. We outline some concrete steps that can be taken for this research programme to advance in a productive and scientifically rigorous fashion.

Related papers

• What is Left for Us? Second Scholarship Against the Degradation of Research by AI [0.0]
  We argue that generative AI can degrade research by eroding the very practices through which judgement is formed and academic trust is built.<n>What is needed instead is a renewed commitment to research as a lived practice in which judgement is formed gradually, often through frictions, and participation in a scholarly community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-04T22:45:23Z)
• AI Research Agents Narrow Scientific Exploration [12.949322198287417]
  We generate 37,802 scientific ideas from shared seed literature across citation-defined research areas in AI and machine learning.<n>We compare the resulting AI ideas against human-authored papers from the same research areas, follow-on human research emerging from the same seed literature, and the seed literature itself.<n>Overall, current AI research agents appear better suited to local elaboration than to broadening scientific exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T03:26:43Z)
• AutoResearchClaw: Self-Reinforcing Autonomous Research with Human-AI Collaboration [175.74514061083195]
  We present AutoResearchClaw, a multi-agent autonomous research pipeline built on five mechanisms.<n>On ARC-Bench, a 25-topic experiment-stage benchmark, AutoResearchClaw outperforms AI Scientist v2 by 54.7%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T15:49:51Z)
• Training AI Co-Scientists Using Rubric Rewards [36.857905469178796]
  A crucial feature of AI co-scientists is the ability to generate a research plan given a set of aims and constraints.<n>In this work, we study how to leverage the vast corpus of existing research papers to train language models that generate better research plans.<n>We build a scalable, diverse training corpus by automatically extracting research goals and goal-specific grading rubrics from papers across several domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T18:59:33Z)
• From Hypothesis to Publication: A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Driven Research Support Systems [40.10425916520717]
  In recent years, the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has inspired researchers to explore how AI can accelerate and enhance research.<n>This paper presents a systematic review of the progress in this domain.<n>We organize relevant studies into three main categories: hypothesis formulation, hypothesis validation, and manuscript publication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T11:27:13Z)
• Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
  A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently.<n>Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z)
• Speciesism in Natural Language Processing Research [3.1077024712075794]
  The purpose of this study is to investigate whether there is speciesism, i.e., discrimination against nonhuman animals, in NLP research. The findings of this study suggest that speciesism exists within researchers, data, and models, respectively. Specifically, our survey and experiments show that (a) among NLP researchers, even those who study social bias in AI, do not recognize speciesism or speciesist bias; (b) among NLP data, speciesist bias is inherent in the data annotated in the datasets used to evaluate NLP models; (c) OpenAI GPTs, recent NLP models, exhibit
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T06:09:41Z)
• Generative AI in Writing Research Papers: A New Type of Algorithmic Bias and Uncertainty in Scholarly Work [0.38850145898707145]
  Large language models (LLMs) and generative AI tools present challenges in identifying and addressing biases. generative AI tools are susceptible to goal misgeneralization, hallucinations, and adversarial attacks such as red teaming prompts. We find that incorporating generative AI in the process of writing research manuscripts introduces a new type of context-induced algorithmic bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T04:05:04Z)
• Towards Possibilities & Impossibilities of AI-generated Text Detection: A Survey [97.33926242130732]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the domain of natural language processing (NLP) with remarkable capabilities of generating human-like text responses. Despite these advancements, several works in the existing literature have raised serious concerns about the potential misuse of LLMs. To address these concerns, a consensus among the research community is to develop algorithmic solutions to detect AI-generated text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T18:11:32Z)
• Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences and the arts and humanities: A bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021 [73.06361680847708]
  In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI, but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI (many in computer science), but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. We conclude that the context of the current surge appears different, and that interdisciplinary AI application is likely to be sustained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T14:08:07Z)
• Science in the Era of ChatGPT, Large Language Models and Generative AI: Challenges for Research Ethics and How to Respond [3.3504365823045044]
  This paper reviews challenges, ethical and integrity risks in science conduct in the advent of generative AI. The role of AI language models as a research instrument and subject is scrutinized along with ethical implications for scientists, participants and reviewers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T16:23:46Z)
• Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Current & Future Trends [76.94037394832931]
  In recent years, the CHI community has seen significant growth in research on Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence. All of this work is aimed at developing AI that benefits humanity while being grounded in human rights and ethics, and reducing the potential harms of AI. In this special interest group, we aim to bring together researchers from academia and industry interested in these topics to map current and future research trends.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T08:59:42Z)
• The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies [97.5153823429076]
  The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed. The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z)
• Can Machines Imitate Humans? Integrative Turing-like tests for Language and Vision Demonstrate a Narrowing Gap [56.611702960809644]
  We benchmark AI's ability to imitate humans in three language tasks and three vision tasks.<n>Next, we conducted 72,191 Turing-like tests with 1,916 human judges and 10 AI judges.<n>Imitation ability showed minimal correlation with conventional AI performance metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T16:16:52Z)
• Interactive Visual Reasoning under Uncertainty [29.596555383319814]
  We devise the IVRE environment for evaluating artificial agents' reasoning ability under uncertainty. IVRE is an interactive environment featuring rich scenarios centered around Blicket detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-18T13:32:41Z)
• Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
  Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z)
• The Offense-Defense Balance of Scientific Knowledge: Does Publishing AI Research Reduce Misuse? [0.0]
  There is growing concern over the potential misuse of artificial intelligence (AI) research. Publishing scientific research can facilitate misuse of the technology, but the research can also contribute to protections against misuse. This paper addresses the balance between these two effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-27T10:20:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.