Performance Evaluation of General Purpose Large Language Models for Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms Code Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04697v1
• Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 06:33:59 GMT
• Title: Performance Evaluation of General Purpose Large Language Models for Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms Code Generation
• Authors: Daichi Mukunoki, Shun-ichiro Hayashi, Tetsuya Hoshino, Takahiro Katagiri,
• Abstract summary: We evaluate the capability of existing general LLMs for BLAS code generation for CPUs.<n>We found that correct code can be generated in many cases even when only routine name are given.<n>We also confirmed that thread parallelization with OpenMP, SIMD vectorization, and cache blocking can be implemented to some extent.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI technology based on Large Language Models (LLM) has been developed and applied to assist or automatically generate program codes. In this paper, we evaluate the capability of existing general LLMs for Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms (BLAS) code generation for CPUs. We use two LLMs provided by OpenAI: GPT-4.1, a Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) model, and o4-mini, one of the o-series of Reasoning models. Both have been released in April 2025. For the routines from level-1 to 3 BLAS, we tried to generate (1) C code without optimization from routine name only, (2) C code with basic performance optimizations (thread parallelization, SIMD vectorization, and cache blocking) from routine name only, and (3) C code with basic performance optimizations based on Fortran reference code. As a result, we found that correct code can be generated in many cases even when only routine name are given. We also confirmed that thread parallelization with OpenMP, SIMD vectorization, and cache blocking can be implemented to some extent, and that the code is faster than the reference code.

Related papers

• IFEvalCode: Controlled Code Generation [69.28317223249358]
  The paper introduces forward and backward constraints generation to improve the instruction-following capabilities of Code LLMs.<n>The authors present IFEvalCode, a multilingual benchmark comprising 1.6K test samples across seven programming languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T08:08:48Z)
• PerfCodeGen: Improving Performance of LLM Generated Code with Execution Feedback [78.89596149768458]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely adopted for assisting in software development tasks.<n>We propose PerfCodeGen, a training-free framework that enhances the performance of LLM-generated code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T06:22:38Z)
• OMPar: Automatic Parallelization with AI-Driven Source-to-Source Compilation [4.266086505323998]
  This paper introduces OMPar, an AI-driven tool designed to automate the parallelization of C/C++ code using OpenMP pragmas. OMPar integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) through two key components: OMPify, which assesses loop parallelization potential, and MonoCoder-OMP, a new fine-tuned model which generates precise OpenMP pragmas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T07:39:01Z)
• When to Stop? Towards Efficient Code Generation in LLMs with Excess Token Prevention [43.39584272739589]
  We introduce CodeFast, an inference acceleration approach for Code LLMs on code generation. Key idea of CodeFast is to terminate the inference process in time when unnecessary excess tokens are detected. We conduct extensive experiments with CodeFast on five representative Code LLMs across four widely used code generation datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T14:27:08Z)
• Should AI Optimize Your Code? A Comparative Study of Classical Optimizing Compilers Versus Current Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) raise intriguing questions about the potential of these AI approaches to revolutionize code optimization.<n>This work aims to answer an essential question for the compiler community: "Can AI-driven models revolutionize the way we approach code optimization?"<n>We present a comparative analysis between three classical optimizing compilers and two recent large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T23:26:41Z)
• Performance-Aligned LLMs for Generating Fast Code [2.180216161965907]
  We introduce a reinforcement learning based methodology to align the outputs of code LLMs with performance. We demonstrate that our fine-tuned model improves the expected speedup of generated code over base models for a set of benchmark tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T16:52:38Z)
• StepCoder: Improve Code Generation with Reinforcement Learning from Compiler Feedback [58.20547418182074]
  We introduce StepCoder, a novel framework for code generation, consisting of two main components. CCCS addresses the exploration challenge by breaking the long sequences code generation task into a Curriculum of Code Completion Subtasks. FGO only optimize the model by masking the unexecuted code segments to provide Fine-Grained Optimization. Our method improves the ability to explore the output space and outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in corresponding benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T13:14:31Z)
• LangProp: A code optimization framework using Large Language Models applied to driving [17.581983909703283]
  LangProp is a framework for iteratively optimizing code generated by large language models (LLMs) We show how LangProp can generate interpretable and transparent policies that can be verified and improved in a metric- and data-driven way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T18:52:06Z)
• Exploring Continual Learning for Code Generation Models [80.78036093054855]
  Continual Learning (CL) is an important aspect that remains underexplored in the code domain. We introduce a benchmark called CodeTask-CL that covers a wide range of tasks, including code generation, translation, summarization, and refinement. We find that effective methods like Prompt Pooling (PP) suffer from catastrophic forgetting due to the unstable training of the prompt selection mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T16:58:39Z)
• CodeT5+: Open Code Large Language Models for Code Understanding and Generation [72.1638273937025]
  Large language models (LLMs) pretrained on vast source code have achieved prominent progress in code intelligence. CodeT5+ is a family of encoder-decoder LLMs for code in which component modules can be flexibly combined to suit a wide range of downstream code tasks. We extensively evaluate CodeT5+ on over 20 code-related benchmarks in different settings, including zero-shot, finetuning, and instruction-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-13T14:23:07Z)
• PolyDL: Polyhedral Optimizations for Creation of High Performance DL primitives [55.79741270235602]
  We present compiler algorithms to automatically generate high performance implementations of Deep Learning primitives. We develop novel data reuse analysis algorithms using the polyhedral model. We also show that such a hybrid compiler plus a minimal library-use approach results in state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-02T06:44:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.