MIRRAMS: Towards Training Models Robust to Missingness Distribution Shifts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08280v1
• Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 03:03:30 GMT
• Title: MIRRAMS: Towards Training Models Robust to Missingness Distribution Shifts
• Authors: Jihye Lee, Minseo Kang, Dongha Kim,
• Abstract summary: In real-world data analysis, missingness distributional shifts between training and test input datasets frequently occur.<n>We propose a novel deep learning framework designed to address such shifts in missingness distributions.<n>Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance even without missing data and can be naturally extended to address semi-supervised learning tasks.
• Score: 2.5357049657770516
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In real-world data analysis, missingness distributional shifts between training and test input datasets frequently occur, posing a significant challenge to achieving robust prediction performance. In this study, we propose a novel deep learning framework designed to address such shifts in missingness distributions. We begin by introducing a set of mutual information-based conditions, called MI robustness conditions, which guide a prediction model to extract label-relevant information while remaining invariant to diverse missingness patterns, thereby enhancing robustness to unseen missingness scenarios at test-time. To make these conditions practical, we propose simple yet effective techniques to derive loss terms corresponding to each and formulate a final objective function, termed MIRRAMS(Mutual Information Regularization for Robustness Against Missingness Shifts). As a by-product, our analysis provides a theoretical interpretation of the principles underlying consistency regularization-based semi-supervised learning methods, such as FixMatch. Extensive experiments across various benchmark datasets show that MIRRAMS consistently outperforms existing baselines and maintains stable performance across diverse missingness scenarios. Moreover, our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance even without missing data and can be naturally extended to address semi-supervised learning tasks, highlighting MIRRAMS as a powerful, off-the-shelf framework for general-purpose learning.

Related papers

• Adaptive Evidential Learning for Temporal-Semantic Robustness in Moment Retrieval [39.603000380180774]
  Debiased Evidential Learning for Moment Retrieval (DEMR) is a novel framework that incorporates a Reflective Flipped Fusion (RFF) block for cross-modal alignment.<n>We introduce a Geom-regularizer to refine uncertainty predictions, enabling adaptive alignment with difficult moments and improving retrieval accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-30T16:13:20Z)
• Modest-Align: Data-Efficient Alignment for Vision-Language Models [67.48633659305592]
  Cross-modal alignment models often suffer from overconfidence and degraded performance when operating in resource-constrained settings.<n>We propose Modest-Align, a lightweight alignment framework designed for robustness and efficiency.<n>Our method offers a practical and scalable solution for cross-modal alignment in real-world, low-resource scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T16:11:10Z)
• THEMIS: Unlocking Pretrained Knowledge with Foundation Model Embeddings for Anomaly Detection in Time Series [0.0]
  THEMIS is a new framework for time series anomaly detection that exploits pretrained knowledge from foundation models.<n>Our experiments show that this modular method achieves SOTA results on the MSL dataset and performs quite competitively on the SMAP and SWAT$*$ datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-04T19:20:35Z)
• Learning Robust Diffusion Models from Imprecise Supervision [75.53546939251146]
  DMIS is a unified framework for training robust Conditional Diffusion Models from Imprecise Supervision.<n>Our framework is derived from likelihood and decomposes the objective into generative and classification components.<n>Experiments on diverse forms of imprecise supervision, covering tasks covering image generation, weakly supervised learning, and dataset condensation demonstrate that DMIS consistently produces high-quality and class-discriminative samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T14:00:32Z)
• Revisiting Multivariate Time Series Forecasting with Missing Values [65.30332997607141]
  Missing values are common in real-world time series.<n>Current approaches have developed an imputation-then-prediction framework that uses imputation modules to fill in missing values, followed by forecasting on the imputed data.<n>This framework overlooks a critical issue: there is no ground truth for the missing values, making the imputation process susceptible to errors that can degrade prediction accuracy.<n>We introduce Consistency-Regularized Information Bottleneck (CRIB), a novel framework built on the Information Bottleneck principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T20:57:48Z)
• Robust Molecular Property Prediction via Densifying Scarce Labeled Data [53.24886143129006]
  In drug discovery, compounds most critical for advancing research often lie beyond the training set.<n>We propose a novel bilevel optimization approach that leverages unlabeled data to interpolate between in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T15:27:40Z)
• Confidence-Aware Self-Distillation for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis with Incomplete Modalities [15.205192581534973]
  Multimodal sentiment analysis aims to understand human sentiment through multimodal data.<n>Existing methods for handling modality missingness are based on data reconstruction or common subspace projections.<n>We propose a Confidence-Aware Self-Distillation (CASD) strategy that effectively incorporates multimodal probabilistic embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T09:48:41Z)
• Meta-Statistical Learning: Supervised Learning of Statistical Inference [59.463430294611626]
  This work demonstrates that the tools and principles driving the success of large language models (LLMs) can be repurposed to tackle distribution-level tasks.<n>We propose meta-statistical learning, a framework inspired by multi-instance learning that reformulates statistical inference tasks as supervised learning problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:04:39Z)
• Learning Dynamic Representations via An Optimally-Weighted Maximum Mean Discrepancy Optimization Framework for Continual Learning [16.10753846850319]
  Continual learning allows models to persistently acquire and retain information.<n> catastrophic forgetting can severely impair model performance.<n>We introduce a novel framework termed Optimally-Weighted Mean Discrepancy (OWMMD), which imposes penalties on representation alterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T13:33:45Z)
• Testing Generalizability in Causal Inference [3.547529079746247]
  No formal procedure exists for statistically evaluating generalizability in machine learning algorithms.<n>We propose a systematic framework for statistically evaluating the generalizability of high-dimensional causal inference models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T11:44:00Z)
• Preference-Based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Data Coverage and Algorithmic Techniques [65.55451717632317]
  We study Preference-Based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (PbMARL)<n>We identify the Nash equilibrium from a preference-only offline dataset in general-sum games.<n>Our findings underscore the multifaceted approach required for PbMARL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-01T13:14:41Z)
• Quantifying Prediction Consistency Under Fine-Tuning Multiplicity in Tabular LLMs [10.494477811252034]
  Fine-tuning multiplicity can arise in Tabular LLMs on classification tasks.<n>Our work formalizes this unique challenge of fine-tuning multiplicity in Tabular LLMs.<n>We propose a novel measure to quantify consistency of individual predictions without expensive model retraining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T22:22:09Z)
• Uncertainty Aware Learning for Language Model Alignment [97.36361196793929]
  We propose uncertainty-aware learning (UAL) to improve the model alignment of different task scenarios. We implement UAL in a simple fashion -- adaptively setting the label smoothing value of training according to the uncertainty of individual samples. Experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that our UAL significantly and consistently outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T11:37:45Z)
• Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learning with Interactive Data Collection: Fundamental Hardness and Near-Optimal Algorithm [14.517103323409307]
  Sim-to-real gap represents disparity between training and testing environments. A promising approach to addressing this challenge is distributionally robust RL. We tackle robust RL via interactive data collection and present an algorithm with a provable sample complexity guarantee.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T16:40:22Z)
• Time-series Generation by Contrastive Imitation [87.51882102248395]
  We study a generative framework that seeks to combine the strengths of both: Motivated by a moment-matching objective to mitigate compounding error, we optimize a local (but forward-looking) transition policy. At inference, the learned policy serves as the generator for iterative sampling, and the learned energy serves as a trajectory-level measure for evaluating sample quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T16:45:25Z)
• New metrics for analyzing continual learners [27.868967961503962]
  Continual Learning (CL) poses challenges to standard learning algorithms. This stability-plasticity dilemma remains central to CL and multiple metrics have been proposed to adequately measure stability and plasticity separately. We propose new metrics that account for the task's increasing difficulty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T13:53:33Z)
• Revisiting the Robustness of the Minimum Error Entropy Criterion: A Transfer Learning Case Study [16.07380451502911]
  This paper revisits the robustness of the minimum error entropy criterion to deal with non-Gaussian noises. We investigate its feasibility and usefulness in real-life transfer learning regression tasks, where distributional shifts are common.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T15:38:11Z)
• Trustworthy Multimodal Regression with Mixture of Normal-inverse Gamma Distributions [91.63716984911278]
  We introduce a novel Mixture of Normal-Inverse Gamma distributions (MoNIG) algorithm, which efficiently estimates uncertainty in principle for adaptive integration of different modalities and produces a trustworthy regression result. Experimental results on both synthetic and different real-world data demonstrate the effectiveness and trustworthiness of our method on various multimodal regression tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-11T14:28:12Z)
• Distributionally Robust Learning [11.916893752969429]
  This book develops a comprehensive statistical learning framework that is robust to (distributional) perturbations in the data. A tractable DRO relaxation for each problem is being derived, establishing a connection between bounds and regularization. Beyond theory, we include numerical experiments and case studies using synthetic and real data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-20T04:14:18Z)
• Accurate and Robust Feature Importance Estimation under Distribution Shifts [49.58991359544005]
  PRoFILE is a novel feature importance estimation method. We show significant improvements over state-of-the-art approaches, both in terms of fidelity and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T05:29:01Z)
• Learning while Respecting Privacy and Robustness to Distributional Uncertainties and Adversarial Data [66.78671826743884]
  The distributionally robust optimization framework is considered for training a parametric model. The objective is to endow the trained model with robustness against adversarially manipulated input data. Proposed algorithms offer robustness with little overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-07T18:25:25Z)
• Meta-Learned Confidence for Few-shot Learning [60.6086305523402]
  A popular transductive inference technique for few-shot metric-based approaches, is to update the prototype of each class with the mean of the most confident query examples. We propose to meta-learn the confidence for each query sample, to assign optimal weights to unlabeled queries. We validate our few-shot learning model with meta-learned confidence on four benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T10:22:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.