To Trade or Not to Trade: An Agentic Approach to Estimating Market Risk Improves Trading Decisions
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08584v1
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 13:29:32 GMT
- Title: To Trade or Not to Trade: An Agentic Approach to Estimating Market Risk Improves Trading Decisions
- Authors: Dimitrios Emmanoulopoulos, Ollie Olby, Justin Lyon, Namid R. Stillman,
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in agentic frameworks.<n>We develop an agentic system that uses LLMs to iteratively discover differential equations for financial time series.<n>We find that model-informed trading strategies outperform standard LLM-based agents.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in agentic frameworks, in which prompts trigger complex tool-based analysis in pursuit of a goal. While these frameworks have shown promise across multiple domains including in finance, they typically lack a principled model-building step, relying instead on sentiment- or trend-based analysis. We address this gap by developing an agentic system that uses LLMs to iteratively discover stochastic differential equations for financial time series. These models generate risk metrics which inform daily trading decisions. We evaluate our system in both traditional backtests and using a market simulator, which introduces synthetic but causally plausible price paths and news events. We find that model-informed trading strategies outperform standard LLM-based agents, improving Sharpe ratios across multiple equities. Our results show that combining LLMs with agentic model discovery enhances market risk estimation and enables more profitable trading decisions.
Related papers
- Robust Reinforcement Learning in Finance: Modeling Market Impact with Elliptic Uncertainty Sets [57.179679246370114]
In financial applications, reinforcement learning (RL) agents are commonly trained on historical data, where their actions do not influence prices.<n>During deployment, these agents trade in live markets where their own transactions can shift asset prices, a phenomenon known as market impact.<n>Traditional robust RL approaches address this model misspecification by optimizing the worst-case performance over a set of uncertainties.<n>We develop a novel class of elliptic uncertainty sets, enabling efficient and tractable robust policy evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-22T18:22:25Z) - When Agents Trade: Live Multi-Market Trading Benchmark for LLM Agents [74.55061622246824]
Agent Market Arena (AMA) is the first lifelong, real-time benchmark for evaluating Large Language Model (LLM)-based trading agents.<n>AMA integrates verified trading data, expert-checked news, and diverse agent architectures within a unified trading framework.<n>It evaluates agents across GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, Claude-3.5-haiku, Claude-sonnet-4, and Gemini-2.0-flash.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T17:54:09Z) - Trade in Minutes! Rationality-Driven Agentic System for Quantitative Financial Trading [57.28635022507172]
TiMi is a rationality-driven multi-agent system that architecturally decouples strategy development from minute-level deployment.<n>We propose a two-tier analytical paradigm from macro patterns to micro customization, layered programming design for trading bot implementation, and closed-loop optimization driven by mathematical reflection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T13:08:55Z) - QuantAgents: Towards Multi-agent Financial System via Simulated Trading [40.636918662488505]
QuantAgents is a multi-agent system integrating simulated trading.<n> QuantAgents comprises four agents: a simulated trading analyst, a risk control analyst, a market news analyst, and a manager.<n>Our system incentivizes agents to receive feedback on two fronts: performance in real-world markets and predictive accuracy in simulated trading.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T09:45:57Z) - StockBench: Can LLM Agents Trade Stocks Profitably In Real-world Markets? [44.10622904101254]
Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated strong capabilities as autonomous agents.<n>We introduce StockBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLM agents in realistic, multi-month stock trading environments.<n>Our evaluation shows that while most LLM agents struggle to outperform the simple buy-and-hold baseline, several models demonstrate the potential to deliver higher returns and manage risk more effectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-02T16:54:57Z) - TradingGroup: A Multi-Agent Trading System with Self-Reflection and Data-Synthesis [15.865159423176982]
TradingGroup is a multi-agent trading system designed to address limitations through a self-reflective architecture and an end-to-end data-synthesis pipeline.<n> TradingGroup consists of specialized agents for news sentiment analysis, financial report interpretation, stock trend forecasting, trading style adaptation, and a trading decision making agent.<n>Specifically, we design self-reflection mechanisms for the stock forecasting, style, and decision-making agents to distill past successes and failures for similar reasoning in analogous future scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-25T00:29:58Z) - Your AI, Not Your View: The Bias of LLMs in Investment Analysis [55.328782443604986]
Large Language Models (LLMs) face frequent knowledge conflicts due to discrepancies between pre-trained parametric knowledge and real-time market data.<n>This paper offers the first quantitative analysis of confirmation bias in LLM-based investment analysis.<n>We observe a consistent preference for large-cap stocks and contrarian strategies across most models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-28T16:09:38Z) - Cross-Asset Risk Management: Integrating LLMs for Real-Time Monitoring of Equity, Fixed Income, and Currency Markets [30.815524322885754]
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools in the field of finance.<n>We introduce a Cross-Asset Risk Management framework that utilizes LLMs to facilitate real-time monitoring of equity, fixed income, and currency markets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-05T22:28:35Z) - ReMA: Learning to Meta-think for LLMs with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [53.817538122688944]
We introduce Reinforced Meta-thinking Agents (ReMA) to elicit meta-thinking behaviors from Reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>ReMA decouples the reasoning process into two hierarchical agents: a high-level meta-thinking agent responsible for generating strategic oversight and plans, and a low-level reasoning agent for detailed executions.<n> Empirical results from single-turn experiments demonstrate that ReMA outperforms single-agent RL baselines on complex reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T16:05:31Z) - Agent Trading Arena: A Study on Numerical Understanding in LLM-Based Agents [69.58565132975504]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language tasks.<n>We present the Agent Trading Arena, a virtual zero-sum stock market in which LLM-based agents engage in competitive multi-agent trading.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T08:41:01Z) - Adversarial Reasoning at Jailbreaking Time [49.70772424278124]
Large language models (LLMs) are becoming more capable and widespread.<n>Recent advances in standardizing, measuring, and scaling test-time compute suggest new methodologies for optimizing models to achieve high performance on hard tasks.<n>In this paper, we apply these advances to the task of model jailbreaking: eliciting harmful responses from aligned LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-03T18:59:01Z) - TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework [4.293484524693143]
TradingAgents proposes a novel stock trading framework inspired by trading firms.<n>It features LLM-powered agents in specialized roles such as fundamental analysts, sentiment analysts, technical analysts, and traders with varied risk profiles.<n>By simulating a dynamic, collaborative trading environment, this framework aims to improve trading performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-28T12:54:06Z) - FinVision: A Multi-Agent Framework for Stock Market Prediction [0.0]
This research introduces a multi-modal multi-agent system designed specifically for financial trading tasks.
A key feature of our approach is the integration of a reflection module, which conducts analyses of historical trading signals and their outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-29T06:02:28Z) - When AI Meets Finance (StockAgent): Large Language Model-based Stock Trading in Simulated Real-world Environments [55.19252983108372]
We have developed a multi-agent AI system called StockAgent, driven by LLMs.
The StockAgent allows users to evaluate the impact of different external factors on investor trading.
It avoids the test set leakage issue present in existing trading simulation systems based on AI Agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-15T06:49:30Z) - An Auction-based Marketplace for Model Trading in Federated Learning [54.79736037670377]
Federated learning (FL) is increasingly recognized for its efficacy in training models using locally distributed data.
We frame FL as a marketplace of models, where clients act as both buyers and sellers.
We propose an auction-based solution to ensure proper pricing based on performance gain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-02T07:25:53Z) - Can ChatGPT Forecast Stock Price Movements? Return Predictability and Large Language Models [51.3422222472898]
We document the capability of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT to predict stock price movements using news headlines.
We develop a theoretical model incorporating information capacity constraints, underreaction, limits-to-arbitrage, and LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-15T19:22:37Z) - Trader-Company Method: A Metaheuristic for Interpretable Stock Price
Prediction [3.9189409002585562]
There are several challenges in financial markets hindering practical applications of machine learning-based models.
We propose the Trader-Company method, a novel evolutionary model that mimics the roles of a financial institute and traders.
Our method predicts future stock returns by aggregating suggestions from multiple weak learners called Traders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-18T13:19:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.