Choosing the Right Git Workflow: A Comparative Analysis of Trunk-based vs. Branch-based Approaches

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08943v1
• Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 18:06:00 GMT
• Title: Choosing the Right Git Workflow: A Comparative Analysis of Trunk-based vs. Branch-based Approaches
• Authors: Pedro Lopes, Paola Accioly, Paulo Borba, Vitor Menezes,
• Abstract summary: Various formats of collaborative development using Git have emerged and gained popularity among software engineers.<n>We can categorize such into two main types: branch-based and trunk-based.<n>Our results indicate that trunk-based development favors fast-paced projects with experienced and smaller teams, while branch-based development suits less experienced and larger teams better.
• Score: 23.436103480497525
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Git has become one of the most widely used version control systems today. Among its distinguishing features, its ability to easily and quickly create branches stands out, allowing teams to customize their workflows. In this context, various formats of collaborative development workflows using Git have emerged and gained popularity among software engineers. We can categorize such workflows into two main types: branch-based workflows and trunk-based workflows. Branch-based workflows typically define a set of remote branches with well-defined objectives, such as feature branches, a branch for feature integration, and a main branch. The goal is to migrate changes from the most isolated branch to the main one shared by all as the code matures. In this category, GitFlow stands out as the most popular example. In contrast, trunk-based workflows have a single remote branch where developers integrate their changes directly. In this range of options, choosing a workflow that maximizes team productivity while promoting software quality becomes a non-trivial task. Despite discussions on forums, social networks, and blogs, few scientific articles have explored this topic. In this work, we provide evidence on how Brazilian developers work with Git workflows and what factors favor or hinder the use of each model. To this end, we conducted semi-structured interviews and a survey with software developers. Our results indicate that trunk-based development favors fast-paced projects with experienced and smaller teams, while branch-based development suits less experienced and larger teams better, despite posing management challenges.

Related papers

• SwingArena: Competitive Programming Arena for Long-context GitHub Issue Solving [90.32201622392137]
  We present SwingArena, a competitive evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Unlike traditional static benchmarks, SwingArena models the collaborative process of software by pairing LLMs as iterations, who generate patches, and reviewers, who create test cases and verify the patches through continuous integration (CI) pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T18:28:02Z)
• ComfyGPT: A Self-Optimizing Multi-Agent System for Comprehensive ComfyUI Workflow Generation [71.31634636156384]
  We introduce ComfyGPT, the first self-optimizing multi-agent system designed to generate ComfyUI based on task descriptions automatically.<n> ComfyGPT comprises four specialized agents: ReformatAgent, FlowAgent, RefineAgent, and ExecuteAgent.<n> FlowDataset is a large-scale dataset containing 13,571 workflow-description pairs, and FlowBench is a benchmark for evaluating workflow generation systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-22T06:48:50Z)
• RepoGraph: Enhancing AI Software Engineering with Repository-level Code Graph [63.87660059104077]
  We present RepoGraph, a plug-in module that manages a repository-level structure for modern AI software engineering solutions.<n>RepoGraph substantially boosts the performance of all systems, leading to a new state-of-the-art among open-source frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T05:45:26Z)
• ComfyBench: Benchmarking LLM-based Agents in ComfyUI for Autonomously Designing Collaborative AI Systems [80.69865295743149]
  This work attempts to study using LLM-based agents to design collaborative AI systems autonomously.<n>Based on ComfyBench, we develop ComfyAgent, a framework that empowers agents to autonomously design collaborative AI systems by generating.<n>While ComfyAgent achieves a comparable resolve rate to o1-preview and significantly surpasses other agents on ComfyBench, ComfyAgent has resolved only 15% of creative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T17:44:10Z)
• Automatic Categorization of GitHub Actions with Transformers and Few-shot Learning [12.254055731378045]
  GitHub Actions (GHA) have been conceived to provide developers with a practical tool to create and maintain a pipeline. To expose actions to search engines, GitHub allows developers to assign them to one or more categories manually. We propose Gavel, a practical solution to increasing the visibility of actions in GitHub.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T02:27:36Z)
• AgileCoder: Dynamic Collaborative Agents for Software Development based on Agile Methodology [5.164094478488741]
  AgileCoder is a multi agent system that integrates Agile Methodology (AM) into the framework. This system assigns specific AM roles - such as Product Manager, Developer, and Tester to different agents, who then collaboratively develop software based on user inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T17:57:48Z)
• On the effectiveness of Large Language Models for GitHub Workflows [9.82254417875841]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their effectiveness in various software development tasks. We perform the first comprehensive study to understand the effectiveness of LLMs on five workflow-related tasks with different levels of prompts. Our evaluation of three state-of-art LLMs and their fine-tuned variants revealed various interesting findings on the current effectiveness and drawbacks of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T05:14:12Z)
• Collaborative, Code-Proximal Dynamic Software Visualization within Code Editors [55.57032418885258]
  This paper introduces the design and proof-of-concept implementation for a software visualization approach that can be embedded into code editors. Our contribution differs from related work in that we use dynamic analysis of a software system's runtime behavior. Our visualization approach enhances common remote pair programming tools and is collaboratively usable by employing shared code cities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-30T06:35:40Z)
• The GitHub Development Workflow Automation Ecosystems [47.818229204130596]
  Large-scale software development has become a highly collaborative endeavour. This chapter explores the ecosystems of development bots and GitHub Actions. It provides an extensive survey of the state-of-the-art in this domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-08T15:24:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.