An Algorithm for Identifying Interpretable Subgroups With Elevated Treatment Effects

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09494v1
• Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:01:48 GMT
• Title: An Algorithm for Identifying Interpretable Subgroups With Elevated Treatment Effects
• Authors: Albert Chiu,
• Abstract summary: We introduce an algorithm for identifying interpretable subgroups with elevated treatment effects, given an estimate of individual or conditional average treatment effects (CATE)<n>Subgroups are characterized by rule sets'' -- easy-to-understand statements of the form (Condition A AND Condition B) OR (Condition C)
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We introduce an algorithm for identifying interpretable subgroups with elevated treatment effects, given an estimate of individual or conditional average treatment effects (CATE). Subgroups are characterized by ``rule sets'' -- easy-to-understand statements of the form (Condition A AND Condition B) OR (Condition C) -- which can capture high-order interactions while retaining interpretability. Our method complements existing approaches for estimating the CATE, which often produce high dimensional and uninterpretable results, by summarizing and extracting critical information from fitted models to aid decision making, policy implementation, and scientific understanding. We propose an objective function that trades-off subgroup size and effect size, and varying the hyperparameter that controls this trade-off results in a ``frontier'' of Pareto optimal rule sets, none of which dominates the others across all criteria. Valid inference is achievable through sample splitting. We demonstrate the utility and limitations of our method using simulated and empirical examples.

Related papers

• MOSIC: Model-Agnostic Optimal Subgroup Identification with Multi-Constraint for Improved Reliability [11.997050225896679]
  We propose a unified optimization framework that directly solves the primal constrained optimization problem to identify optimal subgroups.<n>Our key innovation is a reformulation of the constrained primal problem as an unconstrained differentiable min-max objective, solved via a gradient descent-ascent algorithm.<n>The framework is model-agnostic, compatible with a wide range of CATE estimators, and propensity to additional constraints like cost limits or fairness criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T16:25:23Z)
• A Meta-learner for Heterogeneous Effects in Difference-in-Differences [17.361857058902494]
  We propose a doubly robust meta-learner for the estimation of the Conditional Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (CATT)<n>Our framework allows for the flexible estimation of the CATT, when conditioning on any subset of variables of interest using generic machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T07:04:37Z)
• Structured Conformal Inference for Matrix Completion with Applications to Group Recommender Systems [16.519348575982004]
  We develop a conformal inference method to construct a joint confidence region for a given group of missing entries within a sparsely observed matrix.<n>Our method is model-agnostic and can be combined with any black-box'' matrix completion algorithm to provide reliable uncertainty estimation for group-level recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T17:42:29Z)
• A structured regression approach for evaluating model performance across intersectional subgroups [53.91682617836498]
  Disaggregated evaluation is a central task in AI fairness assessment, where the goal is to measure an AI system's performance across different subgroups. We introduce a structured regression approach to disaggregated evaluation that we demonstrate can yield reliable system performance estimates even for very small subgroups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T14:21:45Z)
• Correcting Underrepresentation and Intersectional Bias for Classification [49.1574468325115]
  We consider the problem of learning from data corrupted by underrepresentation bias. We show that with a small amount of unbiased data, we can efficiently estimate the group-wise drop-out rates. We show that our algorithm permits efficient learning for model classes of finite VC dimension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-19T18:25:44Z)
• A One-shot Framework for Distributed Clustered Learning in Heterogeneous Environments [54.172993875654015]
  The paper proposes a family of communication efficient methods for distributed learning in heterogeneous environments. One-shot approach, based on local computations at the users and a clustering based aggregation step at the server is shown to provide strong learning guarantees. For strongly convex problems it is shown that, as long as the number of data points per user is above a threshold, the proposed approach achieves order-optimal mean-squared error rates in terms of the sample size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-22T09:04:10Z)
• GroupifyVAE: from Group-based Definition to VAE-based Unsupervised Representation Disentanglement [91.9003001845855]
  VAE-based unsupervised disentanglement can not be achieved without introducing other inductive bias. We address VAE-based unsupervised disentanglement by leveraging the constraints derived from the Group Theory based definition as the non-probabilistic inductive bias. We train 1800 models covering the most prominent VAE-based models on five datasets to verify the effectiveness of our method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-20T09:49:51Z)
• Robust Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Uncertainty Quantification [84.53697297858146]
  Subgroup analysis of treatment effects plays an important role in applications from medicine to public policy to recommender systems. Most of the current methods of subgroup analysis begin with a particular algorithm for estimating individualized treatment effects (ITE) This paper develops a new method for subgroup analysis, R2P, that addresses all these weaknesses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T14:50:02Z)
• Model-agnostic Feature Importance and Effects with Dependent Features -- A Conditional Subgroup Approach [0.7349727826230864]
  We propose a new sampling mechanism for the conditional distribution based on permutations in conditional subgroups. As these subgroups are constructed using decision trees (transformation trees), the conditioning becomes inherently interpretable. We show that PFI and PDP based on conditional subgroups often outperform methods such as conditional PFI based on knockoffs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T14:26:45Z)
• Almost-Matching-Exactly for Treatment Effect Estimation under Network Interference [73.23326654892963]
  We propose a matching method that recovers direct treatment effects from randomized experiments where units are connected in an observed network. Our method matches units almost exactly on counts of unique subgraphs within their neighborhood graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T15:21:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.