Adaptability in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Framework and Unified Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10142v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:39:17 GMT
• Title: Adaptability in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Framework and Unified Review
• Authors: Siyi Hu, Mohamad A Hady, Jianglin Qiao, Jimmy Cao, Mahardhika Pratama, Ryszard Kowalczyk,
• Abstract summary: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) has shown clear effectiveness in coordinating multiple agents across simulated benchmarks and constrained scenarios.<n>This survey contributes to the development of algorithms that are better suited for deployment in dynamic, real-world multi-agent systems.
• Score: 9.246912481179464
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) has shown clear effectiveness in coordinating multiple agents across simulated benchmarks and constrained scenarios. However, its deployment in real-world multi-agent systems (MAS) remains limited, primarily due to the complex and dynamic nature of such environments. These challenges arise from multiple interacting sources of variability, including fluctuating agent populations, evolving task goals, and inconsistent execution conditions. Together, these factors demand that MARL algorithms remain effective under continuously changing system configurations and operational demands. To better capture and assess this capacity for adjustment, we introduce the concept of \textit{adaptability} as a unified and practically grounded lens through which to evaluate the reliability of MARL algorithms under shifting conditions, broadly referring to any changes in the environment dynamics that may occur during learning or execution. Centred on the notion of adaptability, we propose a structured framework comprising three key dimensions: learning adaptability, policy adaptability, and scenario-driven adaptability. By adopting this adaptability perspective, we aim to support more principled assessments of MARL performance beyond narrowly defined benchmarks. Ultimately, this survey contributes to the development of algorithms that are better suited for deployment in dynamic, real-world multi-agent systems.

Related papers

• Parallelism Meets Adaptiveness: Scalable Documents Understanding in Multi-Agent LLM Systems [0.8437187555622164]
  Large language model (LLM) agents have shown increasing promise for collaborative task completion.<n>Existing multi-agent frameworks often rely on static, fixed roles, and limited inter-agent communication.<n>This paper proposes a coordination framework that enables adaptiveness through three core mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T22:42:51Z)
• MSDA: Combining Pseudo-labeling and Self-Supervision for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in ASR [59.83547898874152]
  We introduce a sample-efficient, two-stage adaptation approach that integrates self-supervised learning with semi-supervised techniques.<n>MSDA is designed to enhance the robustness and generalization of ASR models.<n>We demonstrate that Meta PL can be applied effectively to ASR tasks, achieving state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T14:46:05Z)
• RAG/LLM Augmented Switching Driven Polymorphic Metaheuristic Framework [5.10888539576355]
  Polymorphic Metaheuristic Framework (PMF) is a self-adaptive metaheuristic switching mechanism driven by real-time performance feedback and dynamic algorithmic selection.<n>By integrating AI-driven decision-making and self-correcting mechanisms, PMF paves the way for scalable, intelligent, and autonomous optimization frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T01:41:22Z)
• Offline Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning via Score Decomposition [51.23590397383217]
  offline cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) faces unique challenges due to distributional shifts.<n>This work is the first work to explicitly address the distributional gap between offline and online MARL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T11:42:31Z)
• SrSv: Integrating Sequential Rollouts with Sequential Value Estimation for Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning [23.032729815716813]
  High complexity of real-world environments exacerbates the credit assignment problem.<n>The variability of agent populations in large-scale scenarios necessitates scalable decision-making mechanisms.<n>We propose a novel framework: Sequential rollout with Sequential value estimation (SrSv)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T12:17:18Z)
• ADAGE: A generic two-layer framework for adaptive agent based modelling [5.623006055588189]
  Agent-based models (ABMs) are valuable for modelling complex, potentially out-of-equilibria scenarios.<n>Recent progress integrating multi-agent reinforcement learning into ABMs introduces adaptive agent behaviour.<n>We develop a generic two-layer framework for ADaptive AGEnt based modelling (ADAGE)<n>This framework formalises the bi-level problem as a Stackelberg game with conditional behavioural policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T09:58:24Z)
• Task-Aware Harmony Multi-Task Decision Transformer for Offline Reinforcement Learning [70.96345405979179]
  The purpose of offline multi-task reinforcement learning (MTRL) is to develop a unified policy applicable to diverse tasks without the need for online environmental interaction. variations in task content and complexity pose significant challenges in policy formulation. We introduce the Harmony Multi-Task Decision Transformer (HarmoDT), a novel solution designed to identify an optimal harmony subspace of parameters for each task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T05:49:14Z)
• HarmoDT: Harmony Multi-Task Decision Transformer for Offline Reinforcement Learning [72.25707314772254]
  We introduce the Harmony Multi-Task Decision Transformer (HarmoDT), a novel solution designed to identify an optimal harmony subspace of parameters for each task. The upper level of this framework is dedicated to learning a task-specific mask that delineates the harmony subspace, while the inner level focuses on updating parameters to enhance the overall performance of the unified policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T11:41:41Z)
• Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Zero-Shot Scalable Collaboration [5.326588461041464]
  Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is transforming fields like autonomous vehicle networks. MARL strategies for different roles can be updated flexibly according to the scales, which is still a challenge for current MARL frameworks. We propose a novel MARL framework named Scalable and Heterogeneous Proximal Policy Optimization (SHPPO) We show SHPPO exhibits superior performance in classic MARL environments like Starcraft Multi-Agent Challenge (SMAC) and Google Research Football (GRF)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T03:02:57Z)
• HAZARD Challenge: Embodied Decision Making in Dynamically Changing Environments [93.94020724735199]
  HAZARD consists of three unexpected disaster scenarios, including fire, flood, and wind. This benchmark enables us to evaluate autonomous agents' decision-making capabilities across various pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T18:59:43Z)
• Stackelberg Decision Transformer for Asynchronous Action Coordination in Multi-Agent Systems [19.130281505547064]
  AReinforcement action coordination presents a pervasive challenge in Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) We propose the Stackelberg Decision Transformer (STEER), an adaptable approach that resolves the difficulties of hierarchical coordination among agents. Experimental results demonstrate that our method can converge to Stackelberg equilibrium solutions and outperforms other existing methods in complex scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-13T07:29:31Z)
• Distributionally Adaptive Meta Reinforcement Learning [85.17284589483536]
  We develop a framework for meta-RL algorithms that behave appropriately under test-time distribution shifts. Our framework centers on an adaptive approach to distributional robustness that trains a population of meta-policies to be robust to varying levels of distribution shift. We show how our framework allows for improved regret under distribution shift, and empirically show its efficacy on simulated robotics problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-06T17:55:09Z)
• Policy Diagnosis via Measuring Role Diversity in Cooperative Multi-agent RL [107.58821842920393]
  We quantify the agent's behavior difference and build its relationship with the policy performance via bf Role Diversity We find that the error bound in MARL can be decomposed into three parts that have a strong relation to the role diversity. The decomposed factors can significantly impact policy optimization on three popular directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T04:58:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.