Response Wide Shut? Surprising Observations in Basic Vision Language Model Capabilities
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10442v1
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 15:26:41 GMT
- Title: Response Wide Shut? Surprising Observations in Basic Vision Language Model Capabilities
- Authors: Shivam Chandhok, Wan-Cyuan Fan, Vered Shwartz, Vineeth N Balasubramanian, Leonid Sigal,
- Abstract summary: Vision-language Models (VLMs) have emerged as general-purpose tools for addressing a variety of complex computer vision problems.<n>We set out to understand the limitations of SoTA VLMs on fundamental visual tasks by constructing a series of tests that probe which components of design, specifically, may be lacking.
- Score: 54.94982467313341
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Vision-language Models (VLMs) have emerged as general-purpose tools for addressing a variety of complex computer vision problems. Such models have been shown to be highly capable, but, at the same time, lacking some basic visual understanding skills. In this paper, we set out to understand the limitations of SoTA VLMs on fundamental visual tasks by constructing a series of tests that probe which components of design, specifically, may be lacking. Importantly, we go significantly beyond the current benchmarks, which simply measure the final performance of VLM response, by also comparing and contrasting it to the performance of probes trained directly on features obtained from the visual encoder, intermediate vision-language projection and LLM-decoder output. In doing so, we uncover shortcomings in VLMs and make a number of important observations about their capabilities, robustness and how they process visual information. We hope our insights will guide progress in further improving VLMs.
Related papers
- Hidden in plain sight: VLMs overlook their visual representations [48.83628674170634]
We compare vision language models (VLMs) to their visual encoders to understand their ability to integrate across these modalities.<n>We find that VLMs perform substantially worse than their visual encoders, dropping to near-chance performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-09T17:59:54Z) - Caption This, Reason That: VLMs Caught in the Middle [3.4820139118440676]
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown remarkable progress in visual understanding in recent years.<n>They still lag behind human capabilities in specific visual tasks such as counting or relational reasoning.<n>We analyze VLM performance along core cognitive axes: Perception, Attention, and Memory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-24T14:25:48Z) - Response Wide Shut: Surprising Observations in Basic Vision Language Model Capabilities [30.176918208200604]
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have emerged as general purpose tools for addressing a variety of complex computer vision problems.
These models have been shown to be highly capable, but also lacking some basic visual understanding skills.
This paper sets out to understand the limitations of SoTA VLMs on fundamental visual tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-13T08:26:32Z) - How Well Can Vision Language Models See Image Details? [53.036922527685064]
We introduce a pixel value prediction task to explore "How Well Can Vision Language Models See Image Details?"
Our research reveals that incorporating pixel value prediction as one of the VLM pre-training tasks and vision encoder adaptation markedly boosts VLM performance on downstream image-language understanding tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-07T17:59:40Z) - Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMs [61.143381152739046]
We introduce Cambrian-1, a family of multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) designed with a vision-centric approach.<n>Our study uses LLMs and visual instruction tuning as an interface to evaluate various visual representations.<n>We provide model weights, code, supporting tools, datasets, and detailed instruction-tuning and evaluation recipes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T17:59:42Z) - BRAVE: Broadening the visual encoding of vision-language models [48.41146184575914]
Vision-language models (VLMs) are composed of a vision encoder, e.g. CLIP, and a language model (LM) that interprets the encoded features to solve downstream tasks.
Despite remarkable progress, VLMs are subject to several shortcomings due to the limited capabilities of vision encoders.
We introduce BRAVE, which consolidates features from multiple frozen encoders into a more versatile representation that can be directly fed as the input to a frozen LM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-10T17:59:45Z) - Behind the Magic, MERLIM: Multi-modal Evaluation Benchmark for Large Image-Language Models [50.653838482083614]
This paper introduces a scalable test-bed to assess the capabilities of IT-LVLMs on fundamental computer vision tasks.<n> MERLIM contains over 300K image-question pairs and has a strong focus on detecting cross-modal "hallucination" events in IT-LVLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-03T16:39:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.