Can Mental Imagery Improve the Thinking Capabilities of AI Systems?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12555v2
• Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 15:39:29 GMT
• Title: Can Mental Imagery Improve the Thinking Capabilities of AI Systems?
• Authors: Slimane Larabi,
• Abstract summary: We investigate how to integrate mental imagery into a machine thinking framework.<n>Our proposed framework integrates a Cognitive thinking unit supported by three auxiliary units: the Input Data Unit, the Needs Unit, and the Mental Imagery Unit.<n>Within this framework, data is represented as natural language sentences or drawn sketches, serving both informative and decision-making purposes.
• Score: 0.6345523830122166
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Although existing models can interact with humans and provide satisfactory responses, they lack the ability to act autonomously or engage in independent reasoning. Furthermore, input data in these models is typically provided as explicit queries, even when some sensory data is already acquired. In addition, AI agents, which are computational entities designed to perform tasks and make decisions autonomously based on their programming, data inputs, and learned knowledge, have shown significant progress. However, they struggle with integrating knowledge across multiple domains, unlike humans. Mental imagery plays a fundamental role in the brain's thinking process, which involves performing tasks based on internal multisensory data, planned actions, needs, and reasoning capabilities. In this paper, we investigate how to integrate mental imagery into a machine thinking framework and how this could be beneficial in initiating the thinking process. Our proposed machine thinking framework integrates a Cognitive thinking unit supported by three auxiliary units: the Input Data Unit, the Needs Unit, and the Mental Imagery Unit. Within this framework, data is represented as natural language sentences or drawn sketches, serving both informative and decision-making purposes. We conducted validation tests for this framework, and the results are presented and discussed.

Related papers

• Thinking Beyond Tokens: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Cognitive Foundations for Artificial General Intelligence and its Societal Impact [27.722167796617114]
  This paper offers a cross-disciplinary synthesis of artificial intelligence, cognitive neuroscience, psychology, generative models, and agent-based systems.<n>We analyze the architectural and cognitive foundations of general intelligence, highlighting the role of modular reasoning, persistent memory, and multi-agent coordination.<n>We identify key scientific, technical, and ethical challenges on the path to Artificial General Intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T16:52:25Z)
• Reasoning in machine vision: learning to think fast and slow [10.430190333487957]
  Reasoning is a hallmark of human intelligence, enabling adaptive decision-making in complex and unfamiliar scenarios.<n>Machine intelligence remains bound to training data, lacking the ability to dynamically refine solutions at inference time.<n>Here we present a novel learning paradigm that enables machine reasoning in vision by allowing performance improvement with increasing thinking time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T10:03:05Z)
• Neural Brain: A Neuroscience-inspired Framework for Embodied Agents [58.58177409853298]
  Current AI systems, such as large language models, remain disembodied, unable to physically engage with the world.<n>At the core of this challenge lies the concept of Neural Brain, a central intelligence system designed to drive embodied agents with human-like adaptability.<n>This paper introduces a unified framework for the Neural Brain of embodied agents, addressing two fundamental challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T15:05:34Z)
• Dissociating Artificial Intelligence from Artificial Consciousness [0.4537124110113416]
  Developments in machine learning and computing power suggest that artificial general intelligence is within reach.<n>This raises the question of artificial consciousness: if a computer were to be functionally equivalent to a human, would it experience sights, sounds, and thoughts, as we do when we are conscious?<n>We employ Integrated Information Theory (IIT), which provides principled tools to determine whether a system is conscious.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T19:28:35Z)
• Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic Systems [67.01132165581667]
  We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components. We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z)
• Incremental procedural and sensorimotor learning in cognitive humanoid robots [52.77024349608834]
  This work presents a cognitive agent that can learn procedures incrementally. We show the cognitive functions required in each substage and how adding new functions helps address tasks previously unsolved by the agent. Results show that this approach is capable of solving complex tasks incrementally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-30T22:51:31Z)
• Building Human-like Communicative Intelligence: A Grounded Perspective [1.0152838128195465]
  After making astounding progress in language learning, AI systems seem to approach the ceiling that does not reflect important aspects of human communicative capacities. This paper suggests that the dominant cognitively-inspired AI directions, based on nativist and symbolic paradigms, lack necessary substantiation and concreteness to guide progress in modern AI. I propose a list of concrete, implementable components for building "grounded" linguistic intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-02T01:43:24Z)
• Cognitive architecture aided by working-memory for self-supervised multi-modal humans recognition [54.749127627191655]
  The ability to recognize human partners is an important social skill to build personalized and long-term human-robot interactions. Deep learning networks have achieved state-of-the-art results and demonstrated to be suitable tools to address such a task. One solution is to make robots learn from their first-hand sensory data with self-supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-16T13:50:24Z)
• AGENT: A Benchmark for Core Psychological Reasoning [60.35621718321559]
  Intuitive psychology is the ability to reason about hidden mental variables that drive observable actions. Despite recent interest in machine agents that reason about other agents, it is not clear if such agents learn or hold the core psychology principles that drive human reasoning. We present a benchmark consisting of procedurally generated 3D animations, AGENT, structured around four scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-24T14:58:23Z)
• Machine Common Sense [77.34726150561087]
  Machine common sense remains a broad, potentially unbounded problem in artificial intelligence (AI) This article deals with the aspects of modeling commonsense reasoning focusing on such domain as interpersonal interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T13:59:47Z)
• How to Answer Why -- Evaluating the Explanations of AI Through Mental Model Analysis [0.0]
  Key question for human-centered AI research is how to validly survey users' mental models. We evaluate whether mental models are suitable as an empirical research method. We propose an exemplary method to evaluate explainable AI approaches in a human-centered way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-11T17:15:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.