Social and Political Framing in Search Engine Results

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13325v1
• Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 17:44:33 GMT
• Title: Social and Political Framing in Search Engine Results
• Authors: Amrit Poudel, Tim Weninger,
• Abstract summary: This study analyzes the outputs of major search engines using a dataset of political and social topics.<n>The findings reveal that search engines prioritize content in ways that reflect underlying biases.<n>Significant differences were observed across search engines in terms of the sources they prioritize.
• Score: 5.478764356647437
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Search engines play a crucial role in shaping public discourse by influencing how information is accessed and framed. While prior research has extensively examined various dimensions of search bias -- such as content prioritization, indexical bias, political polarization, and sources of bias -- an important question remains underexplored: how do search engines and ideologically-motivated user queries contribute to bias in search results. This study analyzes the outputs of major search engines using a dataset of political and social topics. The findings reveal that search engines not only prioritize content in ways that reflect underlying biases but also that ideologically-driven user queries exacerbate these biases, resulting in the amplification of specific narratives. Moreover, significant differences were observed across search engines in terms of the sources they prioritize. These results suggest that search engines may play a pivotal role in shaping public perceptions by reinforcing ideological divides, thereby contributing to the broader issue of information polarization.

Related papers

• Search Arena: Analyzing Search-Augmented LLMs [61.28673331156436]
  We introduce Search Arena, a crowd-sourced, large-scale, human-preference dataset of over 24,000 paired multi-turn user interactions.<n>The dataset spans diverse intents and languages, and contains full system traces with around 12,000 human preference votes.<n>Our analysis reveals that user preferences are influenced by the number of citations, even when the cited content does not directly support the attributed claims.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T17:59:26Z)
• Search engines in polarized media environment: Auditing political information curation on Google and Bing prior to 2024 US elections [0.0]
  We audit the two largest Western search engines, Google and Bing, prior to the 2024 US presidential elections.<n>Our findings indicate that both search engines tend to prioritize left-leaning media sources, with the exact scope of search results' ideological slant varying between Democrat- and Republican-focused queries.<n>We also observe limited effects of location- and time-based factors on organic search results, whereas results for additional interface elements were more volatile over time and specific US states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-08T18:18:03Z)
• Investigating Bias in Political Search Query Suggestions by Relative Comparison with LLMs [1.5356574175312299]
  bias in search query suggestions can lead to exposure to biased search results and can impact opinion formation. We use a multi-step approach to identify and quantify bias in English search query suggestions. We apply our approach to the U.S. political news domain and compare bias in Google and Bing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T12:40:38Z)
• Auditing Google's Search Algorithm: Measuring News Diversity Across Brazil, the UK, and the US [0.0]
  This study examines the influence of Google's search algorithm on news diversity by analyzing search results in Brazil, the UK, and the US. It explores how Google's system preferentially favors a limited number of news outlets. Findings indicate a slight leftward bias in search outcomes and a preference for popular, often national outlets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T11:49:16Z)
• Algorithmic amplification of biases on Google Search [0.6167267484484484]
  This paper investigates how individuals' preexisting attitudes influence the modern information-seeking process. Individuals with opposing attitudes on abortion receive different search results. Google Search engine reinforces preexisting beliefs in search results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T08:24:57Z)
• Examining bias perpetuation in academic search engines: an algorithm audit of Google and Semantic Scholar [0.0]
  This study examines whether confirmation biased queries prompted into Google Scholar will yield results aligned with a query's bias.<n>Technology-related queries displaying more significant disparities.<n>Academic search results that perpetuate confirmation bias have strong implications for both researchers and citizens searching for evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T15:43:31Z)
• User Attitudes to Content Moderation in Web Search [49.1574468325115]
  We examine the levels of support for different moderation practices applied to potentially misleading and/or potentially offensive content in web search. We find that the most supported practice is informing users about potentially misleading or offensive content, and the least supported one is the complete removal of search results. More conservative users and users with lower levels of trust in web search results are more likely to be against content moderation in web search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T10:57:15Z)
• Towards Corpus-Scale Discovery of Selection Biases in News Coverage: Comparing What Sources Say About Entities as a Start [65.28355014154549]
  This paper investigates the challenges of building scalable NLP systems for discovering patterns of media selection biases directly from news content in massive-scale news corpora. We show the capabilities of the framework through a case study on NELA-2020, a corpus of 1.8M news articles in English from 519 news sources worldwide.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T23:36:45Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• Exposing Query Identification for Search Transparency [69.06545074617685]
  We explore the feasibility of approximate exposing query identification (EQI) as a retrieval task by reversing the role of queries and documents in two classes of search systems. We derive an evaluation metric to measure the quality of a ranking of exposing queries, as well as conducting an empirical analysis focusing on various practical aspects of approximate EQI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T20:19:27Z)
• The Matter of Chance: Auditing Web Search Results Related to the 2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Elections Across Six Search Engines [68.8204255655161]
  We look at the text search results for "us elections", "donald trump", "joe biden" and "bernie sanders" queries on Google, Baidu, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo, and Yandex. Our findings indicate substantial differences in the search results between search engines and multiple discrepancies within the results generated for different agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-03T11:18:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.