Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Aerial and UAV Photogrammetry through Error Propagation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13486v1
• Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 18:50:01 GMT
• Title: Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Aerial and UAV Photogrammetry through Error Propagation
• Authors: Debao Huang, Rongjun Qin,
• Abstract summary: Uncertainty quantification of the photogrammetry process is essential for providing per-point accuracy credentials of the point clouds.<n>We present an uncertainty quantification framework by associating an error covariance matrix per point accounting for this two-step photogrammetry process.<n>Compared to existing approaches, our method uses self-contained, reliable 3D points extracted directly from the MVS process.
• Score: 5.146618378243241
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Uncertainty quantification of the photogrammetry process is essential for providing per-point accuracy credentials of the point clouds. Unlike airborne LiDAR, which typically delivers consistent accuracy across various scenes, the accuracy of photogrammetric point clouds is highly scene-dependent, since it relies on algorithm-generated measurements (i.e., stereo or multi-view stereo). Generally, errors of the photogrammetric point clouds propagate through a two-step process: Structure-from-Motion (SfM) with Bundle adjustment (BA), followed by Multi-view Stereo (MVS). While uncertainty estimation in the SfM stage has been well studied using the first-order statistics of the reprojection error function, that in the MVS stage remains largely unsolved and non-standardized, primarily due to its non-differentiable and multi-modal nature (i.e., from pixel values to geometry). In this paper, we present an uncertainty quantification framework closing this gap by associating an error covariance matrix per point accounting for this two-step photogrammetry process. Specifically, to estimate the uncertainty in the MVS stage, we propose a novel, self-calibrating method by taking reliable n-view points (n>=6) per-view to regress the disparity uncertainty using highly relevant cues (such as matching cost values) from the MVS stage. Compared to existing approaches, our method uses self-contained, reliable 3D points extracted directly from the MVS process, with the benefit of being self-supervised and naturally adhering to error propagation path of the photogrammetry process, thereby providing a robust and certifiable uncertainty quantification across diverse scenes. We evaluate the framework using a variety of publicly available airborne and UAV imagery datasets. Results demonstrate that our method outperforms existing approaches by achieving high bounding rates without overestimating uncertainty.

Related papers

• Solving Inverse Problems with FLAIR [59.02385492199431]
  Flow-based latent generative models are able to generate images with remarkable quality, even enabling text-to-image generation.<n>We present FLAIR, a novel training free variational framework that leverages flow-based generative models as a prior for inverse problems.<n>Results on standard imaging benchmarks demonstrate that FLAIR consistently outperforms existing diffusion- and flow-based methods in terms of reconstruction quality and sample diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T09:29:47Z)
• Deep priors for satellite image restoration with accurate uncertainties [4.879530644978008]
  We propose a generic method involving a single network to restore images from several sensors.<n>VBLE-xz is a scalable method to get realistic posterior samples and accurate uncertainties.<n>SatDPIR is a compelling alternative to direct inversion methods when uncertainty is not required.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T12:56:03Z)
• Instant Uncertainty Calibration of NeRFs Using a Meta-calibrator [60.47106421809998]
  We introduce the concept of a meta-calibrator that performs uncertainty calibration for NeRFs with a single forward pass. We show that the meta-calibrator can generalize on unseen scenes and achieves well-calibrated and state-of-the-art uncertainty for NeRFs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T21:29:31Z)
• On the Quantification of Image Reconstruction Uncertainty without Training Data [5.057039869893053]
  We propose a deep variational framework that leverages a deep generative model to learn an approximate posterior distribution. We parameterize the target posterior using a flow-based model and minimize their Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence to achieve accurate uncertainty estimation. Our results indicate that our method provides reliable and high-quality image reconstruction with robust uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:46:47Z)
• A Critical Analysis of Internal Reliability for Uncertainty Quantification of Dense Image Matching in Multi-view Stereo [6.080047833147669]
  Photogrammetrically derived point clouds are widely used in many civilian applications. There is no standard error metric to determine per-point errors. Despite the complexity, there exist a few common metrics that may aid the process of estimating the posterior reliability of the derived points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-17T21:06:22Z)
• Degradation-agnostic Correspondence from Resolution-asymmetric Stereo [96.03964515969652]
  We study the problem of stereo matching from a pair of images with different resolutions, e.g., those acquired with a tele-wide camera system. We propose to impose the consistency between two views in a feature space instead of the image space, named feature-metric consistency. We find that, although a stereo matching network trained with the photometric loss is not optimal, its feature extractor can produce degradation-agnostic and matching-specific features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-04T12:24:34Z)
• NUQ: Nonparametric Uncertainty Quantification for Deterministic Neural Networks [151.03112356092575]
  We show the principled way to measure the uncertainty of predictions for a classifier based on Nadaraya-Watson's nonparametric estimate of the conditional label distribution. We demonstrate the strong performance of the method in uncertainty estimation tasks on a variety of real-world image datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T12:30:45Z)
• A Model for Multi-View Residual Covariances based on Perspective Deformation [88.21738020902411]
  We derive a model for the covariance of the visual residuals in multi-view SfM, odometry and SLAM setups. We validate our model with synthetic and real data and integrate it into photometric and feature-based Bundle Adjustment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-01T21:21:56Z)
• Robustness via Uncertainty-aware Cycle Consistency [44.34422859532988]
  Unpaired image-to-image translation refers to learning inter-image-domain mapping without corresponding image pairs. Existing methods learn deterministic mappings without explicitly modelling the robustness to outliers or predictive uncertainty. We propose a novel probabilistic method based on Uncertainty-aware Generalized Adaptive Cycle Consistency (UGAC)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-24T15:33:21Z)
• Deep Bayesian inference for seismic imaging with tasks [0.6445605125467573]
  We propose to use techniques from Bayesian inference and deep neural networks to translate uncertainty in seismic imaging to uncertainty in tasks performed on the image. A systematic approach is proposed to translate uncertainty due to noise in the data to confidence intervals of automatically tracked horizons in the image.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T15:25:44Z)
• PDC-Net+: Enhanced Probabilistic Dense Correspondence Network [161.76275845530964]
  Enhanced Probabilistic Dense Correspondence Network, PDC-Net+, capable of estimating accurate dense correspondences. We develop an architecture and an enhanced training strategy tailored for robust and generalizable uncertainty prediction. Our approach obtains state-of-the-art results on multiple challenging geometric matching and optical flow datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T17:56:41Z)
• Learning Accurate Dense Correspondences and When to Trust Them [161.76275845530964]
  We aim to estimate a dense flow field relating two images, coupled with a robust pixel-wise confidence map. We develop a flexible probabilistic approach that jointly learns the flow prediction and its uncertainty. Our approach obtains state-of-the-art results on challenging geometric matching and optical flow datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-05T18:54:11Z)
• Self-Calibration Supported Robust Projective Structure-from-Motion [80.15392629310507]
  We propose a unified Structure-from-Motion (SfM) method, in which the matching process is supported by self-calibration constraints. We show experimental results demonstrating robust multiview matching and accurate camera calibration by exploiting these constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-04T08:47:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.