A Reproducibility Study of Product-side Fairness in Bundle Recommendation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14352v1
• Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 20:06:39 GMT
• Title: A Reproducibility Study of Product-side Fairness in Bundle Recommendation
• Authors: Huy-Son Nguyen, Yuanna Liu, Masoud Mansoury, Mohammad Alian Nejadi, Alan Hanjalic, Maarten de Rijke,
• Abstract summary: We study product-side fairness in bundle recommendation (BR) across three real-world datasets.<n>Our results show that exposure patterns differ notably between bundles and items, revealing the need for fairness interventions.<n>We also find that fairness assessments vary considerably depending on the metric used, reinforcing the need for multi-faceted evaluation.
• Score: 50.09508982179837
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recommender systems are known to exhibit fairness issues, particularly on the product side, where products and their associated suppliers receive unequal exposure in recommended results. While this problem has been widely studied in traditional recommendation settings, its implications for bundle recommendation (BR) remain largely unexplored. This emerging task introduces additional complexity: recommendations are generated at the bundle level, yet user satisfaction and product (or supplier) exposure depend on both the bundle and the individual items it contains. Existing fairness frameworks and metrics designed for traditional recommender systems may not directly translate to this multi-layered setting. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive reproducibility study of product-side fairness in BR across three real-world datasets using four state-of-the-art BR methods. We analyze exposure disparities at both the bundle and item levels using multiple fairness metrics, uncovering important patterns. Our results show that exposure patterns differ notably between bundles and items, revealing the need for fairness interventions that go beyond bundle-level assumptions. We also find that fairness assessments vary considerably depending on the metric used, reinforcing the need for multi-faceted evaluation. Furthermore, user behavior plays a critical role: when users interact more frequently with bundles than with individual items, BR systems tend to yield fairer exposure distributions across both levels. Overall, our findings offer actionable insights for building fairer bundle recommender systems and establish a vital foundation for future research in this emerging domain.

Related papers

• Producer-Fairness in Sequential Bundle Recommendation [62.22091013241362]
  We formalize producer-fairness, that seeks to achieve desired exposure of different item groups across users in a recommendation session.<n>We propose an exact solution that caters to small instances of our problem.<n>We then examine twos, quality-first and fairness-first, and an adaptive variant that determines on-the-fly the right balance between bundle fairness and quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T11:24:52Z)
• Learning Recommender Systems with Soft Target: A Decoupled Perspective [49.83787742587449]
  We propose a novel decoupled soft label optimization framework to consider the objectives as two aspects by leveraging soft labels. We present a sensible soft-label generation algorithm that models a label propagation algorithm to explore users' latent interests in unobserved feedback via neighbors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T04:20:15Z)
• Towards Fair RAG: On the Impact of Fair Ranking in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [53.285436927963865]
  This paper is the first systematic evaluation of RAG systems that integrate fairness-aware rankings.<n>We show that incorporating fairness-aware retrieval often maintains or even enhances both ranking quality and generation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T23:10:04Z)
• FairSR: Fairness-aware Sequential Recommendation through Multi-Task Learning with Preference Graph Embeddings [14.543386085745192]
  Sequential recommendation learns from the temporal dynamics of user-item interactions to predict the next ones. This paper aims at bringing a marriage between SR and algorithmic fairness. We propose a novel fairness-aware sequential recommendation task, in which a new metric, interaction fairness, is defined.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-30T17:33:51Z)
• Joint Multisided Exposure Fairness for Recommendation [76.75990595228666]
  This paper formalizes a family of exposure fairness metrics that model the problem jointly from the perspective of both the consumers and producers. Specifically, we consider group attributes for both types of stakeholders to identify and mitigate fairness concerns that go beyond individual users and items towards more systemic biases in recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T19:13:23Z)
• FaiRIR: Mitigating Exposure Bias from Related Item Recommendations in Two-Sided Platforms [17.42360994589386]
  We introduce flexible interventions (FaiRIR) in the Related Item Recommendations pipeline. We show that our mechanisms allow for a fine-grained control on the exposure distribution, often at a small or no cost in terms of relatedness and user satisfaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-01T07:01:33Z)
• Deep Causal Reasoning for Recommendations [47.83224399498504]
  A new trend in recommender system research is to negate the influence of confounders from a causal perspective. We model the recommendation as a multi-cause multi-outcome (MCMO) inference problem. We show that MCMO modeling may lead to high variance due to scarce observations associated with the high-dimensional causal space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-06T15:00:01Z)
• A Graph-based Approach for Mitigating Multi-sided Exposure Bias in Recommender Systems [7.3129791870997085]
  We introduce FairMatch, a graph-based algorithm that improves exposure fairness for items and suppliers. A comprehensive set of experiments on two datasets and comparison with state-of-the-art baselines show that FairMatch, while significantly improves exposure fairness and aggregate diversity, maintains an acceptable level of relevance of the recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T18:01:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.