AI for Better UX in Computer-Aided Engineering: Is Academia Catching Up with Industry Demands? A Multivocal Literature Review
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.16586v1
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 13:39:45 GMT
- Title: AI for Better UX in Computer-Aided Engineering: Is Academia Catching Up with Industry Demands? A Multivocal Literature Review
- Authors: Choro Ulan Uulu, Mikhail Kulyabin, Layan Etaiwi, Nuno Miguel Martins Pacheco, Jan Joosten, Kerstin Röse, Filippos Petridis, Jan Bosch, Helena Holmström Olsson,
- Abstract summary: Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) enables simulation experts to optimize complex models, but faces challenges in user experience (UX) that limit efficiency and accessibility.<n>While artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated potential to enhance CAE processes, research integrating these fields with a focus on UX remains fragmented.<n>This paper presents a multivocal literature review (MLR) examining how AI enhances UX in CAE software across both academic research and industry implementations.
- Score: 3.5213888068272183
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) enables simulation experts to optimize complex models, but faces challenges in user experience (UX) that limit efficiency and accessibility. While artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated potential to enhance CAE processes, research integrating these fields with a focus on UX remains fragmented. This paper presents a multivocal literature review (MLR) examining how AI enhances UX in CAE software across both academic research and industry implementations. Our analysis reveals significant gaps between academic explorations and industry applications, with companies actively implementing LLMs, adaptive UIs, and recommender systems while academic research focuses primarily on technical capabilities without UX validation. Key findings demonstrate opportunities in AI-powered guidance, adaptive interfaces, and workflow automation that remain underexplored in current research. By mapping the intersection of these domains, this study provides a foundation for future work to address the identified research gaps and advance the integration of AI to improve CAE user experience.
Related papers
- The AI Imperative: Scaling High-Quality Peer Review in Machine Learning [49.87236114682497]
We argue that AI-assisted peer review must become an urgent research and infrastructure priority.<n>We propose specific roles for AI in enhancing factual verification, guiding reviewer performance, assisting authors in quality improvement, and supporting ACs in decision-making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-09T18:37:14Z) - Edge-Cloud Collaborative Computing on Distributed Intelligence and Model Optimization: A Survey [59.52058740470727]
Edge-cloud collaborative computing (ECCC) has emerged as a pivotal paradigm for addressing the computational demands of modern intelligent applications.<n>Recent advancements in AI, particularly deep learning and large language models (LLMs), have dramatically enhanced the capabilities of these distributed systems.<n>This survey provides a structured tutorial on fundamental architectures, enabling technologies, and emerging applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-03T13:55:38Z) - Collaborative AI in Sentiment Analysis: System Architecture, Data Prediction and Deployment Strategies [3.3374611485861116]
Large language model (LLM) based artificial intelligence technologies have been a game-changer, particularly in sentiment analysis.
However, integrating diverse AI models for processing complex multimodal data and the associated high costs of feature extraction presents significant challenges.
This study introduces a collaborative AI framework designed to efficiently distribute and resolve tasks across various AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T06:14:34Z) - The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Software Testing [0.14896196009851972]
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have significantly impacted various industries.
Software testing, a crucial part of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), ensures the quality and reliability of software products.
This paper explores the role of AI and ML in software testing by reviewing existing literature, analyzing current tools and techniques, and presenting case studies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-04T13:25:13Z) - Networking Systems for Video Anomaly Detection: A Tutorial and Survey [55.28514053969056]
Video Anomaly Detection (VAD) is a fundamental research task within the Artificial Intelligence (AI) community.<n>With the advancements in deep learning and edge computing, VAD has made significant progress.<n>This article offers an exhaustive tutorial for novices in NSVAD.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-16T02:00:44Z) - Bridging the Gap: A Study of AI-based Vulnerability Management between Industry and Academia [4.4037442949276455]
Recent research advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have yielded promising results for automated software vulnerability management.
The industry remains very cautious and selective about integrating AI-based techniques into their security vulnerability management workflow.
We propose a set of future directions to help better understand industry expectations, improve the practical usability of AI-based security vulnerability research, and drive a synergistic relationship between industry and academia.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-03T19:00:50Z) - PerfDetectiveAI -- Performance Gap Analysis and Recommendation in
Software Applications [0.0]
PerfDetectiveAI, a conceptual framework for performance gap analysis and suggestion in software applications is introduced in this research.
Modern machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques are used in PerfDetectiveAI to monitor performance measurements and identify areas of underperformance in software applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-11T02:53:04Z) - A Mini Review on the utilization of Reinforcement Learning with OPC UA [0.9208007322096533]
Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a powerful machine learning paradigm that has been applied in various fields such as robotics, natural language processing and game playing.
The key to fully exploiting this potential is the seamless integration of RL into existing industrial systems.
This work serves to bridge this gap by providing a brief technical overview of both technologies and carrying out a semi-exhaustive literature review.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T13:03:48Z) - AI for IT Operations (AIOps) on Cloud Platforms: Reviews, Opportunities
and Challenges [60.56413461109281]
Artificial Intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) aims to combine the power of AI with the big data generated by IT Operations processes.
We discuss in depth the key types of data emitted by IT Operations activities, the scale and challenges in analyzing them, and where they can be helpful.
We categorize the key AIOps tasks as - incident detection, failure prediction, root cause analysis and automated actions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-10T15:38:12Z) - OpenAGI: When LLM Meets Domain Experts [51.86179657467822]
Human Intelligence (HI) excels at combining basic skills to solve complex tasks.
This capability is vital for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and should be embedded in comprehensive AI Agents.
We introduce OpenAGI, an open-source platform designed for solving multi-step, real-world tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-10T03:55:35Z) - Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOPS) Workshop White Paper [50.25428141435537]
Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) is an emerging interdisciplinary field arising in the intersection between machine learning, big data, streaming analytics, and the management of IT operations.
Main aim of the AIOPS workshop is to bring together researchers from both academia and industry to present their experiences, results, and work in progress in this field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-15T10:43:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.