The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Software Testing
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.02693v1
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 13:25:13 GMT
- Title: The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Software Testing
- Authors: Ahmed Ramadan, Husam Yasin, Burhan Pektas,
- Abstract summary: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have significantly impacted various industries.
Software testing, a crucial part of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), ensures the quality and reliability of software products.
This paper explores the role of AI and ML in software testing by reviewing existing literature, analyzing current tools and techniques, and presenting case studies.
- Score: 0.14896196009851972
- License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have significantly impacted various industries, including software development. Software testing, a crucial part of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), ensures the quality and reliability of software products. Traditionally, software testing has been a labor-intensive process requiring significant manual effort. However, the advent of AI and ML has transformed this landscape by introducing automation and intelligent decision-making capabilities. AI and ML technologies enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing by automating complex tasks such as test case generation, test execution, and result analysis. These technologies reduce the time required for testing and improve the accuracy of defect detection, ultimately leading to higher quality software. AI can predict potential areas of failure by analyzing historical data and identifying patterns, which allows for more targeted and efficient testing. This paper explores the role of AI and ML in software testing by reviewing existing literature, analyzing current tools and techniques, and presenting case studies that demonstrate the practical benefits of these technologies. The literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the advancements in AI and ML applications in software testing, highlighting key methodologies and findings from various studies. The analysis of current tools showcases the capabilities of popular AI-driven testing tools such as Eggplant AI, Test.ai, Selenium, Appvance, Applitools Eyes, Katalon Studio, and Tricentis Tosca, each offering unique features and advantages. Case studies included in this paper illustrate real-world applications of AI and ML in software testing, showing significant improvements in testing efficiency, accuracy, and overall software quality.
Related papers
- The Future of Software Testing: AI-Powered Test Case Generation and Validation [0.0]
This paper explores the transformative potential of AI in improving test case generation and validation.
It focuses on its ability to enhance efficiency, accuracy, and scalability in testing processes.
It also addresses key challenges associated with adapting AI for testing, including the need for high quality training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-09T17:12:40Z) - AI-powered test automation tools: A systematic review and empirical evaluation [1.3490988186255937]
We investigate the features provided by existing AI-based test automation tools.
We empirically evaluate how the AI features can be helpful for effectiveness and efficiency of testing.
We also study the limitations of the AI features in AI-based test tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-31T10:10:45Z) - A Multi-Year Grey Literature Review on AI-assisted Test Automation [46.97326049485643]
Test Automation (TA) techniques are crucial for quality assurance in software engineering.
TA techniques face limitations such as high test suite maintenance costs and the need for extensive programming skills.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers new opportunities to address these issues through automation and improved practices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-12T15:26:36Z) - Using Machine Learning To Identify Software Weaknesses From Software
Requirement Specifications [49.1574468325115]
This research focuses on finding an efficient machine learning algorithm to identify software weaknesses from requirement specifications.
Keywords extracted using latent semantic analysis help map the CWE categories to PROMISE_exp. Naive Bayes, support vector machine (SVM), decision trees, neural network, and convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms were tested.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-10T13:19:10Z) - Comparing Software Developers with ChatGPT: An Empirical Investigation [0.0]
This paper conducts an empirical investigation, contrasting the performance of software engineers and AI systems, like ChatGPT, across different evaluation metrics.
The paper posits that a comprehensive comparison of software engineers and AI-based solutions, considering various evaluation criteria, is pivotal in fostering human-machine collaboration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T17:25:54Z) - Enabling Automated Machine Learning for Model-Driven AI Engineering [60.09869520679979]
We propose a novel approach to enable Model-Driven Software Engineering and Model-Driven AI Engineering.
In particular, we support Automated ML, thus assisting software engineers without deep AI knowledge in developing AI-intensive systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-06T10:12:56Z) - Artificial Intelligence in Software Testing : Impact, Problems,
Challenges and Prospect [0.0]
The study aims to recognize and explain some of the biggest challenges software testers face while applying AI to testing.
The paper also proposes some key contributions of AI in the future to the domain of software testing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-14T10:21:51Z) - Technology Readiness Levels for Machine Learning Systems [107.56979560568232]
Development and deployment of machine learning systems can be executed easily with modern tools, but the process is typically rushed and means-to-an-end.
We have developed a proven systems engineering approach for machine learning development and deployment.
Our "Machine Learning Technology Readiness Levels" framework defines a principled process to ensure robust, reliable, and responsible systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-11T15:54:48Z) - Technology Readiness Levels for AI & ML [79.22051549519989]
Development of machine learning systems can be executed easily with modern tools, but the process is typically rushed and means-to-an-end.
Engineering systems follow well-defined processes and testing standards to streamline development for high-quality, reliable results.
We propose a proven systems engineering approach for machine learning development and deployment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-21T17:14:34Z) - Quality Management of Machine Learning Systems [0.0]
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a part of our daily lives due to major advances in Machine Learning (ML) techniques.
For business/mission-critical systems, serious concerns about reliability and maintainability of AI applications remain.
This paper presents a view of a holistic quality management framework for ML applications based on the current advances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-16T21:34:44Z) - Machine Learning for Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping [73.30245214374027]
The software development industry is rapidly adopting machine learning for transitioning modern day software systems towards highly intelligent and self-learning systems.
No comprehensive study exists that explores the current state-of-the-art on the adoption of machine learning across software engineering life cycle stages.
This study introduces a machine learning for software engineering (MLSE) taxonomy classifying the state-of-the-art machine learning techniques according to their applicability to various software engineering life cycle stages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-27T11:56:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.