Weak Links in LinkedIn: Enhancing Fake Profile Detection in the Age of LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.16860v1
• Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 17:23:52 GMT
• Title: Weak Links in LinkedIn: Enhancing Fake Profile Detection in the Age of LLMs
• Authors: Apoorva Gulati, Rajesh Kumar, Vinti Agarwal, Aditya Sharma,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have made it easier to create realistic fake profiles on platforms like LinkedIn.<n>This poses a significant risk for text-based fake profile detectors.<n>In this study, we evaluate the robustness of existing detectors against LLM-generated profiles.
• Score: 3.250177259081117
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have made it easier to create realistic fake profiles on platforms like LinkedIn. This poses a significant risk for text-based fake profile detectors. In this study, we evaluate the robustness of existing detectors against LLM-generated profiles. While highly effective in detecting manually created fake profiles (False Accept Rate: 6-7%), the existing detectors fail to identify GPT-generated profiles (False Accept Rate: 42-52%). We propose GPT-assisted adversarial training as a countermeasure, restoring the False Accept Rate to between 1-7% without impacting the False Reject Rates (0.5-2%). Ablation studies revealed that detectors trained on combined numerical and textual embeddings exhibit the highest robustness, followed by those using numerical-only embeddings, and lastly those using textual-only embeddings. Complementary analysis on the ability of prompt-based GPT-4Turbo and human evaluators affirms the need for robust automated detectors such as the one proposed in this study.

Related papers

• Your Language Model Can Secretly Write Like Humans: Contrastive Paraphrase Attacks on LLM-Generated Text Detectors [65.27124213266491]
  We propose textbfContrastive textbfParaphrase textbfAttack (CoPA), a training-free method that effectively deceives text detectors.<n>CoPA constructs an auxiliary machine-like word distribution as a contrast to the human-like distribution generated by large language models.<n>Our theoretical analysis suggests the superiority of the proposed attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T10:08:39Z)
• ExaGPT: Example-Based Machine-Generated Text Detection for Human Interpretability [62.285407189502216]
  Detecting texts generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) could cause grave mistakes due to incorrect decisions.<n>We introduce ExaGPT, an interpretable detection approach grounded in the human decision-making process.<n>We show that ExaGPT massively outperforms prior powerful detectors by up to +40.9 points of accuracy at a false positive rate of 1%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T01:15:07Z)
• A Practical Examination of AI-Generated Text Detectors for Large Language Models [25.919278893876193]
  Machine-generated content detectors claim to identify such text under various conditions and from any language model.<n>This paper critically evaluates these claims by assessing several popular detectors on a range of domains, datasets, and models that these detectors have not previously encountered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T15:56:11Z)
• Who Wrote This? The Key to Zero-Shot LLM-Generated Text Detection Is GECScore [51.65730053591696]
  We propose a simple yet effective black-box zero-shot detection approach based on the observation that human-written texts typically contain more grammatical errors than LLM-generated texts.<n> Experimental results show that our method outperforms current state-of-the-art (SOTA) zero-shot and supervised methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T12:57:01Z)
• Enhancing Robustness of LLM-Synthetic Text Detectors for Academic Writing: A Comprehensive Analysis [35.351782110161025]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer numerous advantages in terms of revolutionizing work and study methods. They have also garnered significant attention due to their potential negative consequences. One example is generating academic reports or papers with little to no human contribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T01:58:36Z)
• The Looming Threat of Fake and LLM-generated LinkedIn Profiles: Challenges and Opportunities for Detection and Prevention [0.8808993671472349]
  We present a novel method for detecting fake and Large Language Model (LLM)-generated profiles in the LinkedIn Online Social Network. We show that the suggested method can distinguish between legitimate and fake profiles with an accuracy of about 95% across all word embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-21T19:09:24Z)
• OUTFOX: LLM-Generated Essay Detection Through In-Context Learning with Adversarially Generated Examples [44.118047780553006]
  OUTFOX is a framework that improves the robustness of LLM-generated-text detectors by allowing both the detector and the attacker to consider each other's output. Experiments show that the proposed detector improves the detection performance on the attacker-generated texts by up to +41.3 points F1-score. The detector shows a state-of-the-art detection performance: up to 96.9 points F1-score, beating existing detectors on non-attacked texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-21T17:40:47Z)
• RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learning [69.5883095262619]
  RADAR is based on adversarial training of a paraphraser and a detector. The paraphraser's goal is to generate realistic content to evade AI-text detection. RADAR uses the feedback from the detector to update the paraphraser, and vice versa.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-07T21:13:27Z)
• DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvature [143.5381108333212]
  We show that text sampled from an large language model tends to occupy negative curvature regions of the model's log probability function. We then define a new curvature-based criterion for judging if a passage is generated from a given LLM. We find DetectGPT is more discriminative than existing zero-shot methods for model sample detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T18:44:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.