Doubly robust outlier resistant inference on causal treatment effect

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17439v1
• Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:58:54 GMT
• Title: Doubly robust outlier resistant inference on causal treatment effect
• Authors: Joonsung Kang,
• Abstract summary: Outliers can severely distort causal effect estimation in observational studies.<n>We propose a doubly robust point estimator for the average treatment effect under a contaminated model.<n>Our method consistently outperforms existing approaches in both accuracy and robustness.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Outliers can severely distort causal effect estimation in observational studies, yet this issue has received limited attention in the literature. Their influence is especially pronounced in small sample sizes, where detecting and removing outliers becomes increasingly difficult. Therefore, it is essential to estimate treatment effects robustly without excluding these influential data points. To address this, we propose a doubly robust point estimator for the average treatment effect under a contaminated model that includes outliers. Robustness in outcome regression is achieved through a robust estimating equation, while covariate balancing propensity scores (CBPS) ensure resilience in propensity score modeling. To prevent model overfitting due to the inclusion of numerous parameters, we incorporate variable selection. All these components are unified under a penalized empirical likelihood framework. For confidence interval estimation, most existing approaches rely on asymptotic properties, which may be unreliable in finite samples. We derive an optimal finite-sample confidence interval for the average treatment effect using our proposed estimating equation, ensuring that the interval bounds remain unaffected by outliers. Through simulations and a real-world application involving hypertension data with outliers, we demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms existing approaches in both accuracy and robustness.

Related papers

• DFW: A Novel Weighting Scheme for Covariate Balancing and Treatment Effect Estimation [0.0]
  Estimating causal effects from observational data is challenging due to selection bias.<n>We propose Deconfounding Factor Weighting (DFW), a novel propensity score-based approach.<n>DFW prioritizes less confounded samples while mitigating the influence of highly confounded ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T09:51:55Z)
• TULiP: Test-time Uncertainty Estimation via Linearization and Weight Perturbation [11.334867025651233]
  We propose TULiP, a theoretically-driven uncertainty estimator for OOD detection.<n>Our approach considers a hypothetical perturbation applied to the network before convergence.<n>Our method exhibits state-of-the-art performance, particularly for near-distribution samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T17:16:41Z)
• Relaxed Quantile Regression: Prediction Intervals for Asymmetric Noise [51.87307904567702]
  Quantile regression is a leading approach for obtaining such intervals via the empirical estimation of quantiles in the distribution of outputs.<n>We propose Relaxed Quantile Regression (RQR), a direct alternative to quantile regression based interval construction that removes this arbitrary constraint.<n>We demonstrate that this added flexibility results in intervals with an improvement in desirable qualities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T13:36:38Z)
• C-Learner: Constrained Learning for Causal Inference [5.395560682099634]
  We propose a novel debiasing approach that achieves the best weighting of both worlds, producing stable plug-in estimates.<n>Our constrained learning framework solves for the best plug-in estimator under the constraint that the first-order error with respect to the plugged-in quantity is zero.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-15T16:38:28Z)
• Flexible Nonparametric Inference for Causal Effects under the Front-Door Model [2.6900047294457683]
  We develop novel one-step and targeted minimum loss-based estimators for both the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated under front-door assumptions.<n>Our estimators are built on multiple parameterizations of the observed data distribution, including approaches that avoid mediator density entirely.<n>We show how these constraints can be leveraged to improve the efficiency of causal effect estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T22:04:53Z)
• Doubly Robust Proximal Causal Learning for Continuous Treatments [56.05592840537398]
  We propose a kernel-based doubly robust causal learning estimator for continuous treatments. We show that its oracle form is a consistent approximation of the influence function. We then provide a comprehensive convergence analysis in terms of the mean square error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-22T12:18:53Z)
• B-Learner: Quasi-Oracle Bounds on Heterogeneous Causal Effects Under Hidden Confounding [51.74479522965712]
  We propose a meta-learner called the B-Learner, which can efficiently learn sharp bounds on the CATE function under limits on hidden confounding. We prove its estimates are valid, sharp, efficient, and have a quasi-oracle property with respect to the constituent estimators under more general conditions than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T18:07:19Z)
• Monotonicity and Double Descent in Uncertainty Estimation with Gaussian Processes [52.92110730286403]
  It is commonly believed that the marginal likelihood should be reminiscent of cross-validation metrics and that both should deteriorate with larger input dimensions. We prove that by tuning hyper parameters, the performance, as measured by the marginal likelihood, improves monotonically with the input dimension. We also prove that cross-validation metrics exhibit qualitatively different behavior that is characteristic of double descent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T08:09:33Z)
• Partial Identification of Dose Responses with Hidden Confounders [25.468473751289036]
  Inferring causal effects of continuous-valued treatments from observational data is a crucial task. We present novel methodology to bound both average and conditional average continuous-valued treatment-effect estimates. We apply our method to a real-world observational case study to demonstrate the value of identifying dose-dependent causal effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-24T07:02:21Z)
• Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
  Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials. We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z)
• Conformal Inference of Counterfactuals and Individual Treatment Effects [6.810856082577402]
  We propose a conformal inference-based approach that can produce reliable interval estimates for counterfactuals and individual treatment effects. Existing methods suffer from a significant coverage deficit even in simple models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T01:03:32Z)
• Machine learning for causal inference: on the use of cross-fit estimators [77.34726150561087]
  Doubly-robust cross-fit estimators have been proposed to yield better statistical properties. We conducted a simulation study to assess the performance of several estimators for the average causal effect (ACE) When used with machine learning, the doubly-robust cross-fit estimators substantially outperformed all of the other estimators in terms of bias, variance, and confidence interval coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T23:09:55Z)
• On the role of surrogates in the efficient estimation of treatment effects with limited outcome data [43.17788100119767]
  We study how incorporating data on units for which only surrogate outcomes not of primary interest are observed can increase the precision of ATE estimation. We develop robust ATE estimation and inference methods that realize these efficiency gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-27T13:31:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.