AI in Design Education at College Level-Educators' Perspectives and Challenges
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17481v1
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:02:37 GMT
- Title: AI in Design Education at College Level-Educators' Perspectives and Challenges
- Authors: Lizhu Zhang, Cecilia X. Wang,
- Abstract summary: This study examines how current design educators perceive the role of AI in college-level design education.<n>The findings reveal that AI, as a tool and source of information, has become an integral part of design education.<n>At the same time, educators express anticipation for advancements in ethical standards, authenticity, and the resolution of copyright issues related to AI.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Artificial intelligence has deeply permeated numerous fields, especially the design area which relies on technology as a tool for innovation. This change naturally extends to the field of design education, which is closest to design practice. This has led to further exploration of the impact of AI on college-level education in the design discipline. This study aims to examine how current design educators perceive the role of AI in college-level design education, their perspectives on integrating AI into teaching and research, and their concerns regarding its potential challenges in design education and research. Through qualitative, semi-structured, in-depth interviews with seven faculties in U.S. design colleges, the findings reveal that AI, as a tool and source of information, has become an integral part of design education. AI- derived functionalities are increasingly utilized in design software, and educators are actively incorporating AI as a theoretical framework in their teaching. Educators can guide students in using AI tools, but only if they first acquire a strong foundation in basic design principles and skills. This study also indicates the importance of promoting a cooperative relationship between design educators and AI. At the same time, educators express anticipation for advancements in ethical standards, authenticity, and the resolution of copyright issues related to AI.
Related papers
- Tracing the Invisible: Understanding Students' Judgment in AI-Supported Design Work [2.8038082486377114]
This study analyzes reflections from 33 student teams in an HCI design course to examine the kinds of judgments students make when using AI tools.<n>We found both established forms of design judgment (e.g., instrumental, appreciative, quality) and emergent types: agency-distribution judgment and reliability judgment.<n>Our findings suggest that generative AI introduces new layers of complexity into design reasoning, prompting students to reflect on how and when to rely on it.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-13T20:08:10Z) - "From Unseen Needs to Classroom Solutions": Exploring AI Literacy Challenges & Opportunities with Project-based Learning Toolkit in K-12 Education [0.3994567502796064]
There is a growing need to equip K-12 students with AI literacy skills that extend beyond computer science.<n>This paper explores the integration of a Project-Based Learning (PBL) AI toolkit into diverse subject areas, aimed at helping educators teach AI concepts more effectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-23T03:31:02Z) - Generative AI Literacy: Twelve Defining Competencies [48.90506360377104]
This paper introduces a competency-based model for generative artificial intelligence (AI) literacy covering essential skills and knowledge areas necessary to interact with generative AI.<n>The competencies range from foundational AI literacy to prompt engineering and programming skills, including ethical and legal considerations.<n>These twelve competencies offer a framework for individuals, policymakers, government officials, and educators looking to navigate and take advantage of the potential of generative AI responsibly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-29T14:55:15Z) - Understanding Student Acceptance, Trust, and Attitudes Toward AI-Generated Images for Educational Purposes [1.0878040851637998]
This study assesses students' acceptance, trust, and positive attitudes towards AI-generated images for educational tasks.
The results reveal high acceptance, trust, and positive attitudes among students who value the ease of use and potential academic benefits.
These findings suggest a need for developing comprehensive guidelines that address ethical considerations and intellectual property issues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-24T04:39:48Z) - From MOOC to MAIC: Reshaping Online Teaching and Learning through LLM-driven Agents [78.15899922698631]
MAIC (Massive AI-empowered Course) is a new form of online education that leverages LLM-driven multi-agent systems to construct an AI-augmented classroom.
We conduct preliminary experiments at Tsinghua University, one of China's leading universities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-05T13:22:51Z) - Collaborative Design of AI-Enhanced Learning Activities [0.0]
We develop a formative intervention that enables preservice teachers, in-service teachers, and EdTech specialists to effectively incorporate AI into their teaching practices.
Participants reflect on AI's potential in teaching and learning by exploring different activities that can integrate AI literacy in education, including its ethical considerations and potential for innovative pedagogy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-09T08:34:08Z) - ActiveAI: Introducing AI Literacy for Middle School Learners with
Goal-based Scenario Learning [0.0]
The ActiveAI project addresses key challenges in AI education for grades 7-9 students.
The app incorporates a variety of learner inputs like sliders, steppers, and collectors to enhance understanding.
The project is currently in the implementation stage, leveraging the intelligent tutor design principles for app development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-21T11:43:43Z) - AGI: Artificial General Intelligence for Education [41.45039606933712]
This position paper reviews artificial general intelligence (AGI)'s key concepts, capabilities, scope, and potential within future education.
It highlights that AGI can significantly improve intelligent tutoring systems, educational assessment, and evaluation procedures.
The paper emphasizes that AGI's capabilities extend to understanding human emotions and social interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-24T22:31:59Z) - An Experience Report of Executive-Level Artificial Intelligence
Education in the United Arab Emirates [53.04281982845422]
We present an experience report of teaching an AI course to business executives in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)
Rather than focusing only on theoretical and technical aspects, we developed a course that teaches AI with a view to enabling students to understand how to incorporate it into existing business processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-02T20:59:53Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - Creation and Evaluation of a Pre-tertiary Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Curriculum [58.86139968005518]
The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK)-Jockey Club AI for the Future Project (AI4Future) co-created an AI curriculum for pre-tertiary education.
A team of 14 professors with expertise in engineering and education collaborated with 17 principals and teachers from 6 secondary schools to co-create the curriculum.
The co-creation process generated a variety of resources which enhanced the teachers knowledge in AI, as well as fostered teachers autonomy in bringing the subject matter into their classrooms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-19T11:26:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.