Sticking to the Mean: Detecting Sticky Tokens in Text Embedding Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.18171v1
• Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 08:13:16 GMT
• Title: Sticking to the Mean: Detecting Sticky Tokens in Text Embedding Models
• Authors: Kexin Chen, Dongxia Wang, Yi Liu, Haonan Zhang, Wenhai Wang,
• Abstract summary: 'sticky tokens' can undermine the reliability of embeddings in Transformer-based text embedding models.<n>We show that sticky tokens disproportionately dominate the model's internal representations, raising concerns about tokenization robustness.<n>Our findings show the need for better tokenization strategies and model design to mitigate the impact of sticky tokens in future text embedding applications.
• Score: 29.98662898456327
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Despite the widespread use of Transformer-based text embedding models in NLP tasks, surprising 'sticky tokens' can undermine the reliability of embeddings. These tokens, when repeatedly inserted into sentences, pull sentence similarity toward a certain value, disrupting the normal distribution of embedding distances and degrading downstream performance. In this paper, we systematically investigate such anomalous tokens, formally defining them and introducing an efficient detection method, Sticky Token Detector (STD), based on sentence and token filtering. Applying STD to 40 checkpoints across 14 model families, we discover a total of 868 sticky tokens. Our analysis reveals that these tokens often originate from special or unused entries in the vocabulary, as well as fragmented subwords from multilingual corpora. Notably, their presence does not strictly correlate with model size or vocabulary size. We further evaluate how sticky tokens affect downstream tasks like clustering and retrieval, observing significant performance drops of up to 50%. Through attention-layer analysis, we show that sticky tokens disproportionately dominate the model's internal representations, raising concerns about tokenization robustness. Our findings show the need for better tokenization strategies and model design to mitigate the impact of sticky tokens in future text embedding applications.

Related papers

• Broken Tokens? Your Language Model can Secretly Handle Non-Canonical Tokenizations [83.93566096400723]
  We find that instruction-tuned models retain up to 93.4% of their original performance when given a randomly sampled tokenization.<n>Character-level segmentation improves string manipulation and code understanding tasks by up to +14%.<n>Right-aligned digit grouping enhances large-number arithmetic by +33%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T18:02:26Z)
• Causal Estimation of Tokenisation Bias [58.20086589761273]
  We quantify the effect of including or not a subword in a tokeniser's vocabulary on the probability a trained model assigns to the corresponding characters.<n>We find that tokenisation consistently affects models' outputs across scales, vocabularies, and tokenisers.<n> Notably, a subword's presence in a small model's vocabulary may increase its characters' probability by up to 17 times.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T17:59:47Z)
• Disentangling Reasoning Tokens and Boilerplate Tokens For Language Model Fine-tuning [46.43130011147807]
  We argue that tokens serving different roles - specifically, reasoning tokens versus boilerplate tokens - differ significantly in importance and learning complexity.<n>We propose a novel Shuffle-Aware Discriminator (SHAD) for adaptive token discrimination.<n>Using SHAD, we propose the Reasoning-highlighted Fine-Tuning (RFT) method, which adaptively emphasizes reasoning tokens during fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T12:06:24Z)
• SepLLM: Accelerate Large Language Models by Compressing One Segment into One Separator [65.62084602011596]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited exceptional performance across a spectrum of natural language processing tasks.<n>We have identified a key pattern: certain seemingly meaningless separator tokens (i.e., punctuations) contribute disproportionately to attention scores compared to semantically meaningful tokens.<n>We introduce SepLLM, a plug-and-play framework that accelerates inference by compressing these segments and eliminating redundant tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T18:58:57Z)
• Critical Tokens Matter: Token-Level Contrastive Estimation Enhances LLM's Reasoning Capability [53.51560766150442]
  Critical tokens are elements within reasoning trajectories that significantly influence incorrect outcomes.<n>We present a novel framework for identifying these tokens through rollout sampling.<n>We show that identifying and replacing critical tokens significantly improves model accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T18:58:22Z)
• Improbable Bigrams Expose Vulnerabilities of Incomplete Tokens in Byte-Level Tokenizers [32.274579719726546]
  Tokenization is a crucial step that bridges human-readable text with model-readable discrete tokens. Recent studies have revealed that tokenizers can be exploited to elicit unwanted model behaviors. We investigate incomplete tokens, i.e., undecodable tokens with stray bytes resulting from byte-level byte-pair encoding (BPE) tokenization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T07:19:44Z)
• Fishing for Magikarp: Automatically Detecting Under-trained Tokens in Large Language Models [4.165536532090932]
  The disconnect between tokenizer creation and model training in language models allows for specific inputs, such as the infamous SolidGoldMagikarp token, to induce unwanted model behaviour. We present a comprehensive analysis of Large Language Model tokenizers, specifically targeting this issue of detecting under-trained tokens. Through a combination of tokenizer analysis, model weight-based indicators, and prompting techniques, we develop novel and effective methods for automatically detecting these problematic tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T20:37:56Z)
• Tokenization Is More Than Compression [14.939912120571728]
  Existing tokenization approaches like Byte-Pair. (BPE) originate from the field of data compression. We introduce PathPiece, a new tokenizer that segments a document's text into the minimum number of tokens for a given vocabulary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T14:52:15Z)
• Identifying and Analyzing Performance-Critical Tokens in Large Language Models [52.404072802235234]
  We study how large language models learn to perform tasks from demonstrations.<n>Our work sheds light on how large language models learn to perform tasks from demonstrations and deepens our understanding of the roles different types of tokens play in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-20T20:55:21Z)
• Object Recognition as Next Token Prediction [99.40793702627396]
  We present an approach to pose object recognition as next token prediction. The idea is to apply a language decoder that auto-regressively predicts the text tokens from image embeddings to form labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T18:58:40Z)
• A Sentence is Worth 128 Pseudo Tokens: A Semantic-Aware Contrastive Learning Framework for Sentence Embeddings [28.046786376565123]
  We propose a semantics-aware contrastive learning framework for sentence embeddings, termed Pseudo-Token BERT (PT-BERT) We exploit the pseudo-token space (i.e., latent semantic space) representation of a sentence while eliminating the impact of superficial features such as sentence length and syntax. Our model outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines on six standard semantic textual similarity (STS) tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-11T12:29:22Z)
• More Than Words: Collocation Tokenization for Latent Dirichlet Allocation Models [71.42030830910227]
  We propose a new metric for measuring the clustering quality in settings where the models differ. We show that topics trained with merged tokens result in topic keys that are clearer, more coherent, and more effective at distinguishing topics than those unmerged models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-24T14:08:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.