Uncertainty Quantification for Evaluating Machine Translation Bias

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.18338v1
• Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 12:10:21 GMT
• Title: Uncertainty Quantification for Evaluating Machine Translation Bias
• Authors: Ieva Raminta Staliūnaitė, Julius Cheng, Andreas Vlachos,
• Abstract summary: In machine translation (MT), when the source sentence includes a lexeme whose gender is not overtly marked, the model must infer the appropriate gender from the context and/or external knowledge.<n>We find that models with high translation and gender accuracy on unambiguous instances do not necessarily exhibit the expected level of uncertainty in ambiguous ones.
• Score: 6.559560602099439
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In machine translation (MT), when the source sentence includes a lexeme whose gender is not overtly marked, but whose target-language equivalent requires gender specification, the model must infer the appropriate gender from the context and/or external knowledge. Studies have shown that MT models exhibit biased behaviour, relying on stereotypes even when they clash with contextual information. We posit that apart from confidently translating using the correct gender when it is evident from the input, models should also maintain uncertainty about the gender when it is ambiguous. Using recently proposed metrics of semantic uncertainty, we find that models with high translation and gender accuracy on unambiguous instances do not necessarily exhibit the expected level of uncertainty in ambiguous ones. Similarly, debiasing has independent effects on ambiguous and unambiguous translation instances.

Related papers

• Are We Paying Attention to Her? Investigating Gender Disambiguation and Attention in Machine Translation [4.881426374773398]
  We propose a novel evaluation metric called Minimal Pair Accuracy (MPA)<n>MPA focuses on whether models adapt to gender cues in minimal pairs.<n>MPA shows that in anti-stereotypical cases, NMT models tend to more consistently take masculine gender cues into account.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T13:17:23Z)
• Assumed Identities: Quantifying Gender Bias in Machine Translation of Gender-Ambiguous Occupational Terms [2.5764960393034615]
  We introduce GRAPE, a probability-based metric designed to evaluate gender bias.<n>We present GAMBIT-MT, a benchmarking dataset in English with gender-ambiguous occupational terms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T12:16:14Z)
• Beyond Binary Gender: Evaluating Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous Attitude Words [85.48043537327258]
  Existing machine translation gender bias evaluations are primarily focused on male and female genders. This study presents a benchmark AmbGIMT (Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous attitude words) We propose a novel process to evaluate gender bias based on the Emotional Attitude Score (EAS), which is used to quantify ambiguous attitude words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T08:13:51Z)
• Probing Explicit and Implicit Gender Bias through LLM Conditional Text Generation [64.79319733514266]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate biased and toxic responses. We propose a conditional text generation mechanism without the need for predefined gender phrases and stereotypes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T05:31:46Z)
• A Tale of Pronouns: Interpretability Informs Gender Bias Mitigation for Fairer Instruction-Tuned Machine Translation [35.44115368160656]
  We investigate whether and to what extent machine translation models exhibit gender bias. We find that IFT models default to male-inflected translations, even disregarding female occupational stereotypes. We propose an easy-to-implement and effective bias mitigation solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T17:36:55Z)
• VisoGender: A dataset for benchmarking gender bias in image-text pronoun resolution [80.57383975987676]
  VisoGender is a novel dataset for benchmarking gender bias in vision-language models. We focus on occupation-related biases within a hegemonic system of binary gender, inspired by Winograd and Winogender schemas. We benchmark several state-of-the-art vision-language models and find that they demonstrate bias in resolving binary gender in complex scenes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T17:59:51Z)
• Counter-GAP: Counterfactual Bias Evaluation through Gendered Ambiguous Pronouns [53.62845317039185]
  Bias-measuring datasets play a critical role in detecting biased behavior of language models. We propose a novel method to collect diverse, natural, and minimally distant text pairs via counterfactual generation. We show that four pre-trained language models are significantly more inconsistent across different gender groups than within each group.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T12:11:03Z)
• Investigating Failures of Automatic Translation in the Case of Unambiguous Gender [13.58884863186619]
  Transformer based models are the modern work horses for neural machine translation (NMT) We observe a systemic and rudimentary class of errors made by transformer based models with regards to translating from a language that doesn't mark gender on nouns into others that do. We release an evaluation scheme and dataset for measuring the ability of transformer based NMT models to translate gender correctly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-16T00:57:36Z)
• Mitigating Gender Bias in Captioning Systems [56.25457065032423]
  Most captioning models learn gender bias, leading to high gender prediction errors, especially for women. We propose a new Guided Attention Image Captioning model (GAIC) which provides self-guidance on visual attention to encourage the model to capture correct gender visual evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T12:16:19Z)
• Multi-Dimensional Gender Bias Classification [67.65551687580552]
  Machine learning models can inadvertently learn socially undesirable patterns when training on gender biased text. We propose a general framework that decomposes gender bias in text along several pragmatic and semantic dimensions. Using this fine-grained framework, we automatically annotate eight large scale datasets with gender information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T21:23:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.