A Gold Standard Dataset and Evaluation Framework for Depression Detection and Explanation in Social Media using LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.19899v1
• Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 10:01:55 GMT
• Title: A Gold Standard Dataset and Evaluation Framework for Depression Detection and Explanation in Social Media using LLMs
• Authors: Prajval Bolegave, Pushpak Bhattacharya,
• Abstract summary: Early detection of depression from online social media posts holds promise for providing timely mental health interventions.<n>We present a high-quality, expert-annotated dataset of 1,017 social media posts labeled with depressive spans and mapped to 12 depression symptom categories.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Early detection of depression from online social media posts holds promise for providing timely mental health interventions. In this work, we present a high-quality, expert-annotated dataset of 1,017 social media posts labeled with depressive spans and mapped to 12 depression symptom categories. Unlike prior datasets that primarily offer coarse post-level labels \cite{cohan-etal-2018-smhd}, our dataset enables fine-grained evaluation of both model predictions and generated explanations. We develop an evaluation framework that leverages this clinically grounded dataset to assess the faithfulness and quality of natural language explanations generated by large language models (LLMs). Through carefully designed prompting strategies, including zero-shot and few-shot approaches with domain-adapted examples, we evaluate state-of-the-art proprietary LLMs including GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Our comprehensive empirical analysis reveals significant differences in how these models perform on clinical explanation tasks, with zero-shot and few-shot prompting. Our findings underscore the value of human expertise in guiding LLM behavior and offer a step toward safer, more transparent AI systems for psychological well-being.

Related papers

• Quantifying the Reasoning Abilities of LLMs on Real-world Clinical Cases [48.87360916431396]
  We introduce MedR-Bench, a benchmarking dataset of 1,453 structured patient cases, annotated with reasoning references.<n>We propose a framework encompassing three critical examination recommendation, diagnostic decision-making, and treatment planning, simulating the entire patient care journey.<n>Using this benchmark, we evaluate five state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs, including DeepSeek-R1, OpenAI-o3-mini, and Gemini-2.0-Flash Thinking, etc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T18:35:39Z)
• LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
  This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment.<n>We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews.<n>Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z)
• A BERT-Based Summarization approach for depression detection [1.7363112470483526]
  Depression is a globally prevalent mental disorder with potentially severe repercussions if not addressed. Machine learning and artificial intelligence can autonomously detect depression indicators from diverse data sources. Our study proposes text summarization as a preprocessing technique to diminish the length and intricacies of input texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T02:14:34Z)
• WellDunn: On the Robustness and Explainability of Language Models and Large Language Models in Identifying Wellness Dimensions [46.60244609728416]
  Language Models (LMs) are being proposed for mental health applications where the heightened risk of adverse outcomes means predictive performance may not be a litmus test of a model's utility in clinical practice. We introduce an evaluation design that focuses on the robustness and explainability of LMs in identifying Wellness Dimensions (WDs) We reveal four surprising results about LMs/LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T19:50:40Z)
• VALOR-EVAL: Holistic Coverage and Faithfulness Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models [57.43276586087863]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) suffer from hallucination issues, wherein the models generate plausible-sounding but factually incorrect outputs. Existing benchmarks are often limited in scope, focusing mainly on object hallucinations. We introduce a multi-dimensional benchmark covering objects, attributes, and relations, with challenging images selected based on associative biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T04:49:22Z)
• Depression Detection on Social Media with Large Language Models [23.075317886505193]
  Depression detection aims to determine whether an individual suffers from depression by analyzing their history of posts on social media. We propose a novel depression detection system called DORIS, combining medical knowledge and the recent advances in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-16T01:01:16Z)
• Your Model Is Not Predicting Depression Well And That Is Why: A Case Study of PRIMATE Dataset [0.0]
  This paper addresses the quality of annotations in mental health datasets used for NLP-based depression level estimation from social media texts. Our study reveals concerns regarding annotation validity, particularly for the lack of interest or pleasure symptom. Our refined annotations, to be released under a Data Use Agreement, offer a higher-quality test set for anhedonia detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T10:47:02Z)
• A New Benchmark and Reverse Validation Method for Passage-level Hallucination Detection [63.56136319976554]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) generate hallucinations, which can cause significant damage when deployed for mission-critical tasks. We propose a self-check approach based on reverse validation to detect factual errors automatically in a zero-resource fashion. We empirically evaluate our method and existing zero-resource detection methods on two datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T10:14:59Z)
• MentaLLaMA: Interpretable Mental Health Analysis on Social Media with Large Language Models [28.62967557368565]
  We build the first multi-task and multi-source interpretable mental health instruction dataset on social media, with 105K data samples. We use expert-written few-shot prompts and collected labels to prompt ChatGPT and obtain explanations from its responses. Based on the IMHI dataset and LLaMA2 foundation models, we train MentalLLaMA, the first open-source LLM series for interpretable mental health analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-24T06:46:08Z)
• INSTRUCTSCORE: Explainable Text Generation Evaluation with Finegrained Feedback [80.57617091714448]
  We present InstructScore, an explainable evaluation metric for text generation. We fine-tune a text evaluation metric based on LLaMA, producing a score for generated text and a human readable diagnostic report.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:27:22Z)
• MET: Multimodal Perception of Engagement for Telehealth [52.54282887530756]
  We present MET, a learning-based algorithm for perceiving a human's level of engagement from videos. We release a new dataset, MEDICA, for mental health patient engagement detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-17T15:18:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.