Can Memory-Augmented LLM Agents Aid Journalism in Interpreting and Framing News for Diverse Audiences?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21055v2
• Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 22:21:23 GMT
• Title: Can Memory-Augmented LLM Agents Aid Journalism in Interpreting and Framing News for Diverse Audiences?
• Authors: Leyi Ouyang,
• Abstract summary: MADES is an agent-based framework designed to simulate societal communication.<n>We identify confusions and misunderstandings within news content through its iterative discussion process.<n>Results show that agents exhibit significantly improved news understanding after receiving this supplementary material.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Modern news is often comprehensive, weaving together information from diverse domains, including technology, finance, and agriculture. This very comprehensiveness creates a challenge for interpretation, as audiences typically possess specialized knowledge related to their expertise, age, or standpoint. Consequently, a reader might fully understand the financial implications of a story but fail to grasp or even actively misunderstand its legal or technological dimensions, resulting in critical comprehension gaps. In this work, we investigate how to identify these comprehension gaps and provide solutions to improve audiences' understanding of news content, particularly in the aspects of articles outside their primary domains of knowledge. We propose MADES, an agent-based framework designed to simulate societal communication. The framework utilizes diverse agents, each configured to represent a specific occupation or age group. Each agent is equipped with a memory system. These agents are then simulated to discuss the news. This process enables us to monitor and analyze their behavior and cognitive processes. Our findings indicate that the framework can identify confusions and misunderstandings within news content through its iterative discussion process. Based on these accurate identifications, the framework then designs supplementary material. We validated these outcomes using both statistical analysis and human evaluation, and the results show that agents exhibit significantly improved news understanding after receiving this supplementary material.

Related papers

• KEN: Knowledge Augmentation and Emotion Guidance Network for Multimodal Fake News Detection [1.8603865942709585]
  We propose a novel Knowledge Augmentation and Emotion Guidance Network (KEN)<n>On the one hand, we effectively leverage LVLM's powerful semantic understanding and extensive world knowledge.<n>On the other hand, we consider inter-class differences between different emotional types of news through balanced learning, achieving fine-grained modeling of the relationship between emotional types and authenticity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-13T14:28:20Z)
• Profiling News Media for Factuality and Bias Using LLMs and the Fact-Checking Methodology of Human Experts [29.95198868148809]
  We propose a novel methodology that emulates the criteria that professional fact-checkers use to assess the factuality and political bias of an entire outlet.<n>We provide an in-depth error analysis of the effect of media popularity and region on model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T15:49:20Z)
• Talking Point based Ideological Discourse Analysis in News Events [62.18747509565779]
  We propose a framework motivated by the theory of ideological discourse analysis to analyze news articles related to real-world events.<n>Our framework represents the news articles using a relational structure - talking points, which captures the interaction between entities, their roles, and media frames along with a topic of discussion.<n>We evaluate our framework's ability to generate these perspectives through automated tasks - ideology and partisan classification tasks, supplemented by human validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T02:52:34Z)
• SOK-Bench: A Situated Video Reasoning Benchmark with Aligned Open-World Knowledge [60.76719375410635]
  We propose a new benchmark (SOK-Bench) consisting of 44K questions and 10K situations with instance-level annotations depicted in the videos. The reasoning process is required to understand and apply situated knowledge and general knowledge for problem-solving. We generate associated question-answer pairs and reasoning processes, finally followed by manual reviews for quality assurance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-15T21:55:31Z)
• GPT-4V(ision) as A Social Media Analysis Engine [77.23394183063238]
  This paper explores GPT-4V's capabilities for social multimedia analysis. We select five representative tasks, including sentiment analysis, hate speech detection, fake news identification, demographic inference, and political ideology detection. GPT-4V demonstrates remarkable efficacy in these tasks, showcasing strengths such as joint understanding of image-text pairs, contextual and cultural awareness, and extensive commonsense knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T18:36:50Z)
• Getting aligned on representational alignment [93.08284685325674]
  We study the study of representational alignment in cognitive science, neuroscience, and machine learning. Despite their overlapping interests, there is limited knowledge transfer between these fields. We propose a unifying framework that can serve as a common language for research on representational alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T17:47:58Z)
• Interpretable Propaganda Detection in News Articles [30.192497301608164]
  We propose to detect and to show the use of deception techniques as a way to offer interpretability. Our interpretable features can be easily combined with pre-trained language models, yielding state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-29T09:57:01Z)
• Cross-Domain Learning for Classifying Propaganda in Online Contents [67.10699378370752]
  We present an approach to leverage cross-domain learning, based on labeled documents and sentences from news and tweets, as well as political speeches with a clear difference in their degrees of being propagandistic. Our experiments demonstrate the usefulness of this approach, and identify difficulties and limitations in various configurations of sources and targets for the transfer step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:19:13Z)
• Improving Machine Reading Comprehension with Contextualized Commonsense Knowledge [62.46091695615262]
  We aim to extract commonsense knowledge to improve machine reading comprehension. We propose to represent relations implicitly by situating structured knowledge in a context. We employ a teacher-student paradigm to inject multiple types of contextualized knowledge into a student machine reader.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-12T17:20:01Z)
• Machine Learning Explanations to Prevent Overtrust in Fake News Detection [64.46876057393703]
  This research investigates the effects of an Explainable AI assistant embedded in news review platforms for combating the propagation of fake news. We design a news reviewing and sharing interface, create a dataset of news stories, and train four interpretable fake news detection algorithms. For a deeper understanding of Explainable AI systems, we discuss interactions between user engagement, mental model, trust, and performance measures in the process of explaining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-24T05:42:29Z)
• SirenLess: reveal the intention behind news [31.757138364005087]
  We present SirenLess, a visual analytical system for misleading news detection by linguistic features. The system features article explorer, a novel interactive tool that integrates news metadata and linguistic features to reveal semantic structures of news articles. We use SirenLess to analyze 18 news articles from different sources and summarize some helpful patterns for misleading news detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-08T20:36:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.