Prompt template for a fictitious LLM agent in a content-flagging experiment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21842v1
• Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 14:21:00 GMT
• Title: Prompt template for a fictitious LLM agent in a content-flagging experiment
• Authors: Marie-Therese Sekwenz, Daria Simons, Alina Wundsam,
• Abstract summary: Digital regulations such as the European Union's Digital Services Act (DSA) represent major efforts to shape human-centered and human rights-based frameworks for society.<n>Yet, as these laws are translated into practice, challenges emerge at the intersection of technology, law, and design.<n>This paper examines how designers act as mediators between abstract legal requirements and real-world digital experiences for users.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Digital regulations such as the European Union's Digital Services Act (DSA) represent major efforts to shape human-centered and human rights-based frameworks for society. Yet, as these laws are translated into practice, challenges emerge at the intersection of technology, law, and design. This paper presents a qualitative case study examining how designers act as mediators between abstract legal requirements and real-world digital experiences for users, focusing on the design of content reporting mechanisms under Article 16 of the DSA. Through an expert workshop with professional designers from diverse fields (N=9), we explore how legal obligations are interpreted by designers and reflected in discussions and design solutions. Our findings resonate with previous research on the design of reporting mechanisms and dark patterns, highlighting how UX design choices can mislead or hinder users' decision-making and therefore also highlighting the crucial role of design decisions. We show how participatory design methods can bridge disciplinary divides, making legal obligations accessible in compliance fostering design solutions. By using legal design as a lens, we argue that the co-creation of digital regulations and user experience is a core site for digital humanism; where designers, engineers, and legal scholars must collaborate to ensure that systems uphold legal standards to address the challenge the regulation poses to these disciplines.

Related papers

• Cross-Border Legal Adaptation of Autonomous Vehicle Design based on Logic and Non-monotonic Reasoning [19.097291599358574]
  We choose the perspective of designers and try to provide supporting legal reasoning in the design process.<n>Based on argumentation theory, we introduce a logic to represent the basic properties of argument-based practical (normative) reasoning.<n>We show how the reasoning system we provide can help designers to adapt their design solutions more flexibly in the cross-border application of autonomous vehicles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T07:24:15Z)
• The Engineer's Dilemma: A Review of Establishing a Legal Framework for Integrating Machine Learning in Construction by Navigating Precedents and Industry Expectations [3.8314877221880512]
  Despite widespread interest in machine learning (ML), the engineering industry has not yet fully adopted ML-based methods.<n>This paper explores how engineers can navigate legal principles and legislative justifications that support and/or contest the deployment of ML technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T13:28:32Z)
• A Law Reasoning Benchmark for LLM with Tree-Organized Structures including Factum Probandum, Evidence and Experiences [76.73731245899454]
  We propose a transparent law reasoning schema enriched with hierarchical factum probandum, evidence, and implicit experience.<n>Inspired by this schema, we introduce the challenging task, which takes a textual case description and outputs a hierarchical structure justifying the final decision.<n>This benchmark paves the way for transparent and accountable AI-assisted law reasoning in the Intelligent Court''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T10:26:54Z)
• Mapping the Scholarship of Dark Pattern Regulation: A Systematic Review of Concepts, Regulatory Paradigms, and Solutions from an Interdisciplinary Perspective [7.529549026367749]
  This study synthesises the unique trends and characteristics of legal scholarship on dark patterns, identifying five root problems and triple layered harms. It critiques current regulations in terms of legal theories and sectoral legislations, highlighting their connotation in addressing dark patterns. This research critically discusses the current barriers to effective dark pattern regulations and explores promising regulatory solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-14T21:41:18Z)
• On Developing an Artifact-based Approach to Regulatory Requirements Engineering [18.256422026527986]
  Regulatory acts are a challenging source when eliciting, interpreting, and analyzing requirements. No existing approach considers explicating and managing legal domain knowledge and engineering-legal coordination. We introduce the first version of our Artifact Model for Regulatory Requirements Engineering (AM4RRE) and its conceptual foundation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T09:51:56Z)
• I-Design: Personalized LLM Interior Designer [57.00412237555167]
  I-Design is a personalized interior designer that allows users to generate and visualize their design goals through natural language communication. I-Design starts with a team of large language model agents that engage in dialogues and logical reasoning with one another. The final design is then constructed in 3D by retrieving and integrating assets from an existing object database.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T16:17:53Z)
• Exploring Links between Conversational Agent Design Challenges and Interdisciplinary Collaboration [0.0]
  The paper focuses on the socio-technical challenges of Conversational Agents (CA) creation. It proposes a taxonomy of CA design challenges using interdisciplinary collaboration (IDC) as a lens. The paper proposes practical strategies to overcome them which complement existing design principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T10:20:49Z)
• Report of the 1st Workshop on Generative AI and Law [78.62063815165968]
  This report presents the takeaways of the inaugural Workshop on Generative AI and Law (GenLaw) A cross-disciplinary group of practitioners and scholars from computer science and law convened to discuss the technical, doctrinal, and policy challenges presented by law for Generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-11T04:13:37Z)
• Professional Ethics by Design: Co-creating Codes of Conduct for Computational Practice [0.0]
  This paper deals with the importance of developing codes of conduct for practitioners--be it journalists, doctors, attorneys, or other professions--that are encountering ethical issues when using computation. We argue for taking a design-inspired approach when encoding professional ethics into a computational form, so as to co-create codes of conduct for computational practice across a wide range of fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-12T13:46:32Z)
• Design Space Exploration and Explanation via Conditional Variational Autoencoders in Meta-model-based Conceptual Design of Pedestrian Bridges [52.77024349608834]
  This paper provides a performance-driven design exploration framework to augment the human designer through a Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) The CVAE is trained on 18'000 synthetically generated instances of a pedestrian bridge in Switzerland.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T17:28:31Z)
• An Uncommon Task: Participatory Design in Legal AI [64.54460979588075]
  We examine a notable yet understudied AI design process in the legal domain that took place over a decade ago. We show how an interactive simulation methodology allowed computer scientists and lawyers to become co-designers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-08T15:46:52Z)
• A Principled Design of Image Representation: Towards Forensic Tasks [75.40968680537544]
  We investigate the forensic-oriented image representation as a distinct problem, from the perspectives of theory, implementation, and application. At the theoretical level, we propose a new representation framework for forensics, called Dense Invariant Representation (DIR), which is characterized by stable description with mathematical guarantees. We demonstrate the above arguments on the dense-domain pattern detection and matching experiments, providing comparison results with state-of-the-art descriptors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-02T07:46:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.