Why do women pursue a PhD in Computer Science?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22161v1
• Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 18:48:50 GMT
• Title: Why do women pursue a PhD in Computer Science?
• Authors: Erika Ábrahám, Miguel Goulão, Milena Vujošević Janičić, Sarah Jane Delany, Amal Mersni, Oleksandra Yeremenko, Ozge Buyukdagli, Karima Boudaoud, Caroline Oehlhorn, Ute Schmid, Christina Büsing, Helen Bolke-Hermanns, Kaja Köhnle, Matilde Pato, Deniz Sunar Cerci, Larissa Schmid,
• Abstract summary: Computer science attracts few women, and their proportion decreases through advancing career stages.<n>This paper identifies students' career assumptions and information related to PhD studies focused on gender-based differences.<n>We propose a Women Career Lunch program to inform female master students about PhD studies.
• Score: 12.450236170436815
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Computer science attracts few women, and their proportion decreases through advancing career stages. Few women progress to PhD studies in CS after completing master's studies. Empowering women at this stage in their careers is essential to unlock untapped potential for society, industry and academia. This paper identifies students' career assumptions and information related to PhD studies focused on gender-based differences. We propose a Women Career Lunch program to inform female master students about PhD studies that explains the process, clarifies misconceptions, and alleviates concerns. An extensive survey was conducted to identify factors that encourage and discourage students from undertaking PhD studies. We identified statistically significant differences between those who undertook PhD studies and those who didn't, as well as gender differences. A catalogue of questions to initiate discussions with potential PhD students which allowed them to explore these factors was developed and translated to 8 languages. Encouraging factors toward PhD study include interest and confidence in research arising from a research involvement during earlier studies; enthusiasm for and self-confidence in CS in addition to an interest in an academic career; encouragement from external sources; and a positive perception towards PhD studies which can involve achieving personal goals. Discouraging factors include uncertainty and lack of knowledge of the PhD process, a perception of lower job flexibility, and the requirement for long-term commitment. Gender differences highlighted that female students who pursue a PhD have less confidence in their technical skills than males but a higher preference for interdisciplinary areas. Female students are less inclined than males to perceive the industry as offering better job opportunities and more flexible career paths than academia.

Related papers

• Factors Influencing Gender Representation in IT Faculty Programmes: Insights with a Focus on Software Engineering in a Nordic Context [0.0]
  Software engineering remains male-dominated despite efforts to attract and retain women.<n>Family and personal interest are among the main factors motivating women to choose an IT programme.<n>Women perceive more challenges following their chosen career path than men.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-11T20:25:52Z)
• Gender Disparities in Contributions, Leadership, and Collaboration: An Exploratory Study on Software Systems Research [1.8049331600471712]
  We analyzed 2,000 articles published over the past decade in the Journal of Systems and Software.<n>Our analysis showed that only 32.74% of the total authors are women and female-led or supervised studies were fewer than those of men.<n>Third, we explored the areas of software systems research and found that female authors are more actively involved in human-centric research domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T08:20:23Z)
• Perceptions of Entrepreneurship Among Graduate Students: Challenges, Opportunities, and Cultural Biases [0.0]
  The paper focuses on the perceptions of entrepreneurship of graduate students enrolled in a digital-oriented entrepreneurship course. The main issues raised by the students were internal traits and external obstacles, such as lack of resources and support. Gender discrimination and cultural biases persist, limiting opportunities and equality for women.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T08:35:18Z)
• Breaking Barriers: Investigating the Sense of Belonging Among Women and Non-Binary Students in Software Engineering [1.9075820340282934]
  Women are far less likely to pursue a career in the software engineering industry. Reasons for women and other underrepresented minorities to leave the industry are a lack of opportunities for growth and advancement. This research explores how the potential to cultivate or uphold an industry unfavourable to women and non-binary individuals in software engineering education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T20:07:45Z)
• Making Software Development More Diverse and Inclusive: Key Themes, Challenges, and Future Directions [50.545824691484796]
  We identify six themes around the theme challenges and opportunities to improve Software Developer Diversity and Inclusion (SDDI)<n>We identify benefits, harms, and future research directions for the four main themes.<n>We discuss the remaining two themes, Artificial Intelligence & SDDI and AI & Computer Science education, which have a cross-cutting effect on the other themes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T16:18:11Z)
• A machine learning approach to predict university enrolment choices through students' high school background in Italy [42.57210316104905]
  This paper explores the influence of Italian high school students' proficiency in mathematics and the Italian language on their university enrolment choices. We investigate potential gender differences in response to similar previous educational choices and achievements. The findings shed light on the complex interplay of academic proficiency, gender, and high school background in shaping students' choices regarding university education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T10:05:37Z)
• "STILL AROUND": Experiences and Survival Strategies of Veteran Women Software Developers [53.5211430148752]
  We conducted 14 interviews to examine the experiences of people at the intersection of ageism and sexism. We identified 283 codes, which fell into three main categories: Strategies, Experiences, and Perception. Several strategies we identified, such as (Deliberately) Not Trying to Look Younger, were not previously described in the software engineering literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-07T19:26:15Z)
• Exploring the Confounding Factors of Academic Career Success: An Empirical Study with Deep Predictive Modeling [43.91066315776696]
  We propose to explore the determinants of academic career success through an empirical and predictive modeling perspective. We analyze the co-author network and find that potential scholars work closely with influential scholars early on and more closely as they grow. We find that being a Fellow could not bring the improvements of citations and productivity growth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-19T08:16:21Z)
• Towards Understanding Gender-Seniority Compound Bias in Natural Language Generation [64.65911758042914]
  We investigate how seniority impacts the degree of gender bias exhibited in pretrained neural generation models. Our results show that GPT-2 amplifies bias by considering women as junior and men as senior more often than the ground truth in both domains. These results suggest that NLP applications built using GPT-2 may harm women in professional capacities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T20:05:02Z)
• Graduate Employment Prediction with Bias [44.38256197478875]
  Failure of landing a job for college students could cause serious social consequences such as drunkenness and suicide. We develop a framework, i.e., MAYA, to predict students' employment status while considering biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-27T07:30:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.