Invisible Architectures of Thought: Toward a New Science of AI as Cognitive Infrastructure
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22893v2
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:58:29 GMT
- Title: Invisible Architectures of Thought: Toward a New Science of AI as Cognitive Infrastructure
- Authors: Giuseppe Riva,
- Abstract summary: "Cognitive Infrastructure Studies" (CIS) is a new interdisciplinary domain to reconceptualize AI as "cognitive infrastructures"<n>CIS aims to address how AI preprocessing reshapes distributed cognition across individual, collective, and cultural scales.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Contemporary human-AI interaction research overlooks how AI systems fundamentally reshape human cognition pre-consciously, a critical blind spot for understanding distributed cognition. This paper introduces "Cognitive Infrastructure Studies" (CIS) as a new interdisciplinary domain to reconceptualize AI as "cognitive infrastructures": foundational, often invisible systems conditioning what is knowable and actionable in digital societies. These semantic infrastructures transport meaning, operate through anticipatory personalization, and exhibit adaptive invisibility, making their influence difficult to detect. Critically, they automate "relevance judgment," shifting the "locus of epistemic agency" to non-human systems. Through narrative scenarios spanning individual (cognitive dependency), collective (democratic deliberation), and societal (governance) scales, we describe how cognitive infrastructures reshape human cognition, public reasoning, and social epistemologies. CIS aims to address how AI preprocessing reshapes distributed cognition across individual, collective, and cultural scales, requiring unprecedented integration of diverse disciplinary methods. The framework also addresses critical gaps across disciplines: cognitive science lacks population-scale preprocessing analysis capabilities, digital sociology cannot access individual cognitive mechanisms, and computational approaches miss cultural transmission dynamics. To achieve this goal CIS also provides methodological innovations for studying invisible algorithmic influence: "infrastructure breakdown methodologies", experimental approaches that reveal cognitive dependencies by systematically withdrawing AI preprocessing after periods of habituation.
Related papers
- Visual Categorization Across Minds and Models: Cognitive Analysis of Human Labeling and Neuro-Symbolic Integration [0.0]
This paper examines image labeling performance across human participants and deep neural networks.<n>We contrast human strategies such as analogical reasoning, shape-based recognition, and confidence modulation with AI's feature-based processing.<n>Our findings highlight key parallels and divergences between biological and artificial systems in representation, inference, and confidence calibration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-10T05:58:12Z) - Bridging the Gap: Toward Cognitive Autonomy in Artificial Intelligence [1.3126858950459552]
This paper identifies and analyzes seven core deficiencies that constrain contemporary AI models.<n>We argue that these structural limitations prevent current architectures from achieving robust general-ization, lifelong adaptability, and real-world autonomy.<n>We conclude by advocating for a paradigmatic shift toward cognitively grounded AI capable of self-directed adaptation, dynamic representation management, and intentional, goal-oriented behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-01T23:51:08Z) - AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls [153.71048309527225]
This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field.<n>We identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception.<n>We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-27T16:56:04Z) - Think Socially via Cognitive Reasoning [94.60442643943696]
We introduce Cognitive Reasoning, a paradigm modeled on human social cognition.<n>CogFlow is a complete framework that instills this capability in LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-26T16:27:29Z) - Thinking Beyond Tokens: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Cognitive Foundations for Artificial General Intelligence and its Societal Impact [27.722167796617114]
This paper offers a cross-disciplinary synthesis of artificial intelligence, cognitive neuroscience, psychology, generative models, and agent-based systems.<n>We analyze the architectural and cognitive foundations of general intelligence, highlighting the role of modular reasoning, persistent memory, and multi-agent coordination.<n>We identify key scientific, technical, and ethical challenges on the path to Artificial General Intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-01T16:52:25Z) - Neural Brain: A Neuroscience-inspired Framework for Embodied Agents [58.58177409853298]
Current AI systems, such as large language models, remain disembodied, unable to physically engage with the world.<n>At the core of this challenge lies the concept of Neural Brain, a central intelligence system designed to drive embodied agents with human-like adaptability.<n>This paper introduces a unified framework for the Neural Brain of embodied agents, addressing two fundamental challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-12T15:05:34Z) - Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z) - Attention is all they need: Cognitive science and the (techno)political economy of attention in humans and machines [0.0]
This paper critically analyses the "attention economy" within the framework of cognitive science and techno-political economics.
We explore how current business models, particularly in digital platform capitalism, harness user engagement by strategically shaping attentional patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-10T13:53:46Z) - Intelligent problem-solving as integrated hierarchical reinforcement
learning [11.284287026711125]
Development of complex problem-solving behaviour in biological agents depends on hierarchical cognitive mechanisms.
We propose steps to integrate biologically inspired hierarchical mechanisms to enable advanced problem-solving skills in artificial agents.
We expect our results to guide the development of more sophisticated cognitively inspired hierarchical machine learning architectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-18T09:28:03Z) - Cognitive architecture aided by working-memory for self-supervised
multi-modal humans recognition [54.749127627191655]
The ability to recognize human partners is an important social skill to build personalized and long-term human-robot interactions.
Deep learning networks have achieved state-of-the-art results and demonstrated to be suitable tools to address such a task.
One solution is to make robots learn from their first-hand sensory data with self-supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-16T13:50:24Z) - Distributed and Democratized Learning: Philosophy and Research
Challenges [80.39805582015133]
We propose a novel design philosophy called democratized learning (Dem-AI)
Inspired by the societal groups of humans, the specialized groups of learning agents in the proposed Dem-AI system are self-organized in a hierarchical structure to collectively perform learning tasks more efficiently.
We present a reference design as a guideline to realize future Dem-AI systems, inspired by various interdisciplinary fields.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-18T08:45:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.